Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 2/2014

01-02-2014 | How I Do it - Spine

Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy – indications for anterior, posterior or combined procedures for decompression and stabilisation

Authors: Stefan Alexander König, Uwe Spetzger

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The authors describe their experience with the choice of anterior, posterior and combined approaches for the surgical treatment of spondylotic myelopathy.

Methods

Description of surgical anatomy, surgical technique, indications, limitations, complications, specific perioperative considerations and specific information to give to the patient about surgery and potential risks and a summary of 10 key points is given.

Conclusions

If the disease extends behind the posterior vertebral body and if reestablishing spinal sagittal and coronal balance is an aim, then the anterior approach is the best choice. In cases of predominant posterior spinal cord compression and lordotic configuration the posterior approach should be preferred. Decompression of three or more levels, especially in combination with poor bone quality, requires a combined approach.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Epstein NE (2012) Iliac crest autograft versus alternative constructs for anterior cervical spine surgery: Pros, cons, and costs. Surg Neurol Int 3(Suppl 3):S143–S156PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Epstein NE (2012) Iliac crest autograft versus alternative constructs for anterior cervical spine surgery: Pros, cons, and costs. Surg Neurol Int 3(Suppl 3):S143–S156PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fehlings MG, Smith JS, Kopjar B, Arnold PM, Yoon ST, Vaccaro AR, Brodke DS, Janssen ME, Chapman JR, Sasso RC, Woodard EJ, Banco RJ, Massicotte EM, Dekutoski MB, Gokaslan ZL, Bono CM, Shaffrey CI (2012) Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine 16(5):425–432PubMedCrossRef Fehlings MG, Smith JS, Kopjar B, Arnold PM, Yoon ST, Vaccaro AR, Brodke DS, Janssen ME, Chapman JR, Sasso RC, Woodard EJ, Banco RJ, Massicotte EM, Dekutoski MB, Gokaslan ZL, Bono CM, Shaffrey CI (2012) Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine 16(5):425–432PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW Jr, Rodts GE Jr, Mummaneni PV (2011) Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 14(5):619–625PubMed Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW Jr, Rodts GE Jr, Mummaneni PV (2011) Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 14(5):619–625PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB (2013) Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study. Spine J 13(6):689–696PubMedCrossRef Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB (2013) Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study. Spine J 13(6):689–696PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kim PK, Alexander JT (2006) Indications for circumferential surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):299S–307SPubMedCrossRef Kim PK, Alexander JT (2006) Indications for circumferential surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):299S–307SPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Komotar RJ, Mocco J, Kaiser MG (2006) Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for laminectomy and fusion. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):252S–267SPubMedCrossRef Komotar RJ, Mocco J, Kaiser MG (2006) Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for laminectomy and fusion. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):252S–267SPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Medow JE, Trost G, Sandin J (2006) Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for surgical corpectomy. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):233S–241SPubMedCrossRef Medow JE, Trost G, Sandin J (2006) Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for surgical corpectomy. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):233S–241SPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Dang G (2013) Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 22(7):1583–1593PubMedCrossRef Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Dang G (2013) Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 22(7):1583–1593PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy – indications for anterior, posterior or combined procedures for decompression and stabilisation
Authors
Stefan Alexander König
Uwe Spetzger
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1955-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Acta Neurochirurgica 2/2014 Go to the issue

How I Do it - Brain Tumors

Anterior clinoidectomy