Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Breast Oncology

Surgical Delay of the Nipple–Areolar Complex: A Powerful Technique to Maximize Nipple Viability Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Authors: J. Arthur Jensen, MD, Jennifer H. Lin, MD, Nimmi Kapoor, MD, Armando E. Giuliano, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) improves cosmetic outcome of mastectomy, but many patients are not candidates for this procedure because of concerns about nipple-areolar viability. Surgical delay is a technique that has been used for more than 400 years to improve survival of skin flaps. We used a surgical delay procedure to improve nipple viability in patients who were identified to be at high risk for nipple necrosis following NSM.

Methods

Patients at high risk for nipple necrosis following NSM underwent a surgical delay procedure 7–21 days prior to mastectomy. Subareolar biopsy and sentinel node biopsy, if indicated, were performed at the time of the delay procedure. Nipple viability was assessed before and after NSM. If the subareolar biopsy revealed malignancy, the NAC was removed at the time of mastectomy.

Results

31 NAC in 20 patients underwent surgical delay. All of the NAC subjected to a surgical delay survived following the delay procedure. In 2 patients, the subareolar biopsy was positive and 3 NAC were removed at the time of mastectomy (1 for purposes of symmetry). Of the 28 delayed NAC left at the time of NSM, all survived the post-mastectomy course.

Conclusion

A procedure to surgically delay the NAC 7–21 days prior to NSM is demonstrated to ensure viability of NAC in patients previously thought to be at high risk for nipple loss.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8.PubMedCrossRef Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areolar complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.PubMed Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areolar complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros A, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: Oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.PubMedCrossRef Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros A, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: Oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW, Davies CJ, Holliday HW, Elston CW. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71:469–72.PubMedCrossRef Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW, Davies CJ, Holliday HW, Elston CW. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71:469–72.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jensen JA. When can the nipple-areolar complex safely be spared during mastectomy? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:805–7.PubMedCrossRef Jensen JA. When can the nipple-areolar complex safely be spared during mastectomy? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:805–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148–50.PubMedCrossRef Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman RS, Westbrook K, Klimberg VS. Total skin sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areolar complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–12.PubMedCrossRef Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman RS, Westbrook K, Klimberg VS. Total skin sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areolar complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–12.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96:47–51.PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96:47–51.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, Trombetta G, De Meo L, Catanuto G, Carillio G. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:937–40.PubMedCrossRef Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, Trombetta G, De Meo L, Catanuto G, Carillio G. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:937–40.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.PubMedCrossRef Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Nipple-areolar complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:240–4.PubMedCrossRef Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Nipple-areolar complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:240–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1341–7.PubMedCrossRef Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1341–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.PubMedCrossRef Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ghali S, Butler PEM, Tepper OM, Gurtner GC. Vascular delay revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1735–44.PubMedCrossRef Ghali S, Butler PEM, Tepper OM, Gurtner GC. Vascular delay revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1735–44.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jonsson K, Hunt TK, Brennan SS, Mathes SJ. Tissue oxygen measurements in delayed skin flaps: A reconsideration of the mechanisms of the delay phenomena. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:328–35.PubMedCrossRef Jonsson K, Hunt TK, Brennan SS, Mathes SJ. Tissue oxygen measurements in delayed skin flaps: A reconsideration of the mechanisms of the delay phenomena. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:328–35.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dhar SC, Taylor GI. The delay phenomena: the story unfolds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2079–91.PubMedCrossRef Dhar SC, Taylor GI. The delay phenomena: the story unfolds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2079–91.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;30:676–82.CrossRef Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;30:676–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Palmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, Costa A, Benuzzi G. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: Rationale and technique. Breast J. 2005;11:173–8.PubMedCrossRef Palmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, Costa A, Benuzzi G. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: Rationale and technique. Breast J. 2005;11:173–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Spear SL, Hannan CM, Wiley SC, Cocilovo C. Nipple sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1665–73.PubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Hannan CM, Wiley SC, Cocilovo C. Nipple sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1665–73.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jensen JA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: what is the best evidence for safety? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:2195–7.PubMedCrossRef Jensen JA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: what is the best evidence for safety? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:2195–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Seiboth LA, Hannan CM. Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:572–81.PubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Seiboth LA, Hannan CM. Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:572–81.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical Delay of the Nipple–Areolar Complex: A Powerful Technique to Maximize Nipple Viability Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Authors
J. Arthur Jensen, MD
Jennifer H. Lin, MD
Nimmi Kapoor, MD
Armando E. Giuliano, MD
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2528-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2012 Go to the issue