Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Surgery | Gynecologic Oncology

Should We Abandon Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer?

Authors: V. Simon, MD, C. Ngo, MD, PhD, E. Pujade-Lauraine, MD, PhD, G. Ferron, MD, PhD, C. Pomel, MD, PhD, E. Leblanc, MD, PhD, C. Nadeau, MD, I. Ray-Cocquard, MD, PhD, F. Lecuru, MD, PhD, H. Bonsang-Kitzis, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare disease that accounts for 5% of all ovarian cancers and requires surgical complete debulking. To date, the prognostic value of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy remains unclear in this population.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of LGSOC was registered in the Tumeurs Malignes Rares Gynécologiques national network, between January 2000 and July 2017, at 25 centers. All LGSOC were confirmed after pathological review and operated by primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT-IDS). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 126 patients were included, 86.1% were stage III/IV, and 74.6% underwent lymph node dissection (LND). According to the Completeness of Cancer Resection (CCR) score, 83.7% had complete resection. Median OS was 130 months, and median PFS was 41 months. Pelvic and paraaortic LND had no significant impact on OS (p = 0.78) or DFS (p = 0.93), and this was confirmed in subgroups (advanced stages FIGO III/IV, CCR score 0/1 or 2/3, and timing of surgery PDS or NACT-IDS). Histological positive paraaortic lymph nodes had a significant negative impact on PFS in the whole population (HR 2.21, 1.18–4.39, p = 0.02) and in the CC0/CC1 population (HR, 2.28, 1.13–4.59, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic LND in patients with LGSOC improved neither overall nor PFS. A prospective trial would be necessary to validate these results but would be difficult to conduct due to the rarity of this disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K et al. Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(4):496–504.CrossRef Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K et al. Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(4):496–504.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kurman RJ, Shih I-M. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(3):433–43.CrossRef Kurman RJ, Shih I-M. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(3):433–43.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gourley C, Farley J, Provencher DM et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian and primary peritoneal low-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9):S9.CrossRef Gourley C, Farley J, Provencher DM et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian and primary peritoneal low-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9):S9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Plaxe SC. Epidemiology of low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):459.e1–9.CrossRef Plaxe SC. Epidemiology of low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):459.e1–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(1):48–52.CrossRef Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(1):48–52.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schmeler KM, Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease. Curr Oncol Rep. 2008;10(6):519–23.CrossRef Schmeler KM, Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease. Curr Oncol Rep. 2008;10(6):519–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kimyon Comert G, Turkmen O, Mesci CG et al. Maximal cytoreduction is related to improved disease-free survival in low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. Tumori J. 2019;105(3):259–64.CrossRef Kimyon Comert G, Turkmen O, Mesci CG et al. Maximal cytoreduction is related to improved disease-free survival in low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. Tumori J. 2019;105(3):259–64.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M et al. Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40(2):103–6.CrossRef Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M et al. Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40(2):103–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Morice P, Joulie F, Camatte S et al. Lymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of 276 pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomies and surgical implications. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(2):198–205.CrossRef Morice P, Joulie F, Camatte S et al. Lymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of 276 pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomies and surgical implications. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(2):198–205.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wafa M, Braicu EI, Muallem MZ et al. Incidence and pattern of spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(10):5617–21.CrossRef Wafa M, Braicu EI, Muallem MZ et al. Incidence and pattern of spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(10):5617–21.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harter P, Sehouli J, Lorusso D et al. A randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):822–32.CrossRef Harter P, Sehouli J, Lorusso D et al. A randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):822–32.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pomel C, Dauplat J. Management of malignant epithelial tumors of the ovary. J Chir. 2004;141(5):277–84.CrossRef Pomel C, Dauplat J. Management of malignant epithelial tumors of the ovary. J Chir. 2004;141(5):277–84.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):676.e1–7.CrossRef Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):676.e1–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gockley A, Melamed A, Bregar AJ et al. Outcomes of women with high-grade and low-grade advanced-stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):439–47.CrossRef Gockley A, Melamed A, Bregar AJ et al. Outcomes of women with high-grade and low-grade advanced-stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):439–47.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stewart JM, Tone AA, Jiang H et al. The optimal time for surgery in women with serous ovarian cancer. Can. J. Surg. J. Can. Chir. 2016;59(4):223–32.CrossRef Stewart JM, Tone AA, Jiang H et al. The optimal time for surgery in women with serous ovarian cancer. Can. J. Surg. J. Can. Chir. 2016;59(4):223–32.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Škof E, Merlo S, Pilko G, Kobal B. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer. Radiol. Oncol. 2016;50(3):341–6.CrossRef Škof E, Merlo S, Pilko G, Kobal B. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer. Radiol. Oncol. 2016;50(3):341–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH et al. Clinical behavior of stage II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):361–8.CrossRef Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH et al. Clinical behavior of stage II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):361–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al. Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer Off. J. Int. Gynecol. Cancer Soc. 2007;17(6):1238–44.CrossRef Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al. Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer Off. J. Int. Gynecol. Cancer Soc. 2007;17(6):1238–44.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yokota H et al. Assessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy. Cancer 1996;78(4):803–8.CrossRef Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yokota H et al. Assessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy. Cancer 1996;78(4):803–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Minig L, Heitz F, Cibula D et al. Patterns of lymph node metastases in apparent stage I low-Grade epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017;24(9):2720–6.CrossRef Minig L, Heitz F, Cibula D et al. Patterns of lymph node metastases in apparent stage I low-Grade epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017;24(9):2720–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nasioudis D, Mastroyannis SA, Ko EM, Latif NA. Does tumor grade influence the rate of lymph node metastasis in apparent early stage ovarian cancer? Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018;298(1):179–82.CrossRef Nasioudis D, Mastroyannis SA, Ko EM, Latif NA. Does tumor grade influence the rate of lymph node metastasis in apparent early stage ovarian cancer? Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018;298(1):179–82.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Scarabelli C, Gallo A, Visentin MC et al. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997;7(1):18–26.CrossRef Scarabelli C, Gallo A, Visentin MC et al. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997;7(1):18–26.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference du Bois A, Reuss A, Harter P et al. Potential role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of three prospectively randomized phase III multicenter trials. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1733–9.CrossRef du Bois A, Reuss A, Harter P et al. Potential role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of three prospectively randomized phase III multicenter trials. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1733–9.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al. Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(8):560–6.CrossRef Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al. Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(8):560–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yasugi T et al. Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenectomy have similar survival to stage I/II patients and superior survival to other stage III patients. Cancer 1998;83(8):1555–60.CrossRef Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yasugi T et al. Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenectomy have similar survival to stage I/II patients and superior survival to other stage III patients. Cancer 1998;83(8):1555–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should We Abandon Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer?
Authors
V. Simon, MD
C. Ngo, MD, PhD
E. Pujade-Lauraine, MD, PhD
G. Ferron, MD, PhD
C. Pomel, MD, PhD
E. Leblanc, MD, PhD
C. Nadeau, MD
I. Ray-Cocquard, MD, PhD
F. Lecuru, MD, PhD
H. Bonsang-Kitzis, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08361-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2020 Go to the issue