Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in Norway: training, attitudes and preferences—a survey among Norwegian surgeons

Authors: Mari Odlo, Julie Horn, Athanasios Xanthoulis

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is frequently observed in young adults. There is no wide consensus on optimal treatment in the literature, and various procedures are used in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to assess current practice, experience, training, and attitudes towards PSD surgery among Norwegian surgeons.

Methods

An online survey on PSD surgery was created and sent to all members of the Norwegian Surgical Association. Categorical data were reported as frequencies and percentages.

Results

Most currently practicing Norwegian surgeons used the Bascom’s cleft lift (93.2%) or minimally invasive procedures (55.4%). Midline excisions with primary closure (19.7%) or secondary healing (22.4%) were still used by some surgeons, though. Most surgeons had received training in PSD surgery supervised by a specialist, but only about half of them felt sufficiently trained. The surgeons generally performed few PSD operations per year. Many considered PSD as a condition of low surgical status and this patient group as underprioritized.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that PSD surgery in Norway has been moving away from midline excisions and towards off-midline flap procedures and minimally invasive techniques. PSD and its treatment have a low status among many Norwegian surgeons. This study calls for attention to this underprioritized group of patients and shows the need for consensus in PSD treatment such as development of national guidelines in Norway. Further investigation on training in PSD and the role of supervision is needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luedi MM, Schober P, Stauffer VK, Diekmann M, Andereggen L, Doll D. Gender-specific prevalence of pilonidal sinus disease over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(7–8):1582–7.CrossRef Luedi MM, Schober P, Stauffer VK, Diekmann M, Andereggen L, Doll D. Gender-specific prevalence of pilonidal sinus disease over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(7–8):1582–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rushfeldt C, Søreide K. Kirurgisk behandling av pilonidal sykdom. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130(9):936–9.CrossRef Rushfeldt C, Søreide K. Kirurgisk behandling av pilonidal sykdom. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130(9):936–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Luedi M, Doll D, Zypen D, Maak M, Glenemann M, Wieferich K. Stop insulting the patient: neither incidence nor recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease is linked to personal hygiene. Pilonidal Sinus J. 2015;1:11. Luedi M, Doll D, Zypen D, Maak M, Glenemann M, Wieferich K. Stop insulting the patient: neither incidence nor recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease is linked to personal hygiene. Pilonidal Sinus J. 2015;1:11.
4.
go back to reference Søndenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Søreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39–42.CrossRef Søndenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Søreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39–42.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference De Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus disease. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(4):237–47.CrossRef De Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus disease. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(4):237–47.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Doll D, Friederichs J, Düsel W, Fend F, Petersen S. Surgery for asymptomatic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(9):839–44.CrossRef Doll D, Friederichs J, Düsel W, Fend F, Petersen S. Surgery for asymptomatic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(9):839–44.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Di Lauro K, Araimo E, Calculli F, Vertaldi S, et al. Minimally invasive pilonidal sinus treatment: a narrative review. Open Med (Wars). 2019;14:532–6.CrossRef Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Di Lauro K, Araimo E, Calculli F, Vertaldi S, et al. Minimally invasive pilonidal sinus treatment: a narrative review. Open Med (Wars). 2019;14:532–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Milone M, Fernandez LMS, Musella M, Milone F. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(6):547–53.CrossRef Milone M, Fernandez LMS, Musella M, Milone F. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(6):547–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Anoldo P, Milone F, De Palma G. Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: a review of literature with metanalysis. The Surgeon. 2018;16(5):315–20.CrossRef Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Anoldo P, Milone F, De Palma G. Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: a review of literature with metanalysis. The Surgeon. 2018;16(5):315–20.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brown SR, Lund JN. The evidence base for pilonidal sinus surgery is the pits. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(12):1173–5.CrossRef Brown SR, Lund JN. The evidence base for pilonidal sinus surgery is the pits. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(12):1173–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fabricius R, Petersen LW, Bertelsen CA. Treatment of pilonidal sinuses in Denmark is not optimal. Dan Med Bull. 2010;57(12):A4200. Fabricius R, Petersen LW, Bertelsen CA. Treatment of pilonidal sinuses in Denmark is not optimal. Dan Med Bull. 2010;57(12):A4200.
12.
go back to reference Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Herold A, Doll D. German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;5:1–12. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Herold A, Doll D. German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;5:1–12.
13.
go back to reference Milone M, Basso L, Manigrasso M, Pietroletti R, Bondurri A, La Torre M, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(12):1269–80.CrossRef Milone M, Basso L, Manigrasso M, Pietroletti R, Bondurri A, La Torre M, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(12):1269–80.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(2):146–57.CrossRef Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(2):146–57.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Iesalnieks I, Ommer A. The management of pilonidal sinus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:12–21. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A. The management of pilonidal sinus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:12–21.
16.
go back to reference Senapati A. Out of the midline—cleft lift, advancement and rotation procedures. Coloproctology. 2019;41(2):101–5.CrossRef Senapati A. Out of the midline—cleft lift, advancement and rotation procedures. Coloproctology. 2019;41(2):101–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lamdark T, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Bielicki IN, Guglielmetti LC, Choudhury RA, Peters N, et al. Treatment strategies for pilonidal sinus disease in Switzerland and Austria. Medicina. 2020;56(7):341.CrossRef Lamdark T, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Bielicki IN, Guglielmetti LC, Choudhury RA, Peters N, et al. Treatment strategies for pilonidal sinus disease in Switzerland and Austria. Medicina. 2020;56(7):341.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Britton DC. Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: a snapshot of current practice. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(12):1619–20.CrossRef Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Britton DC. Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: a snapshot of current practice. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(12):1619–20.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, Schmid M, Diekmann M, Wieferich K, et al. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3058.CrossRef Stauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, Schmid M, Diekmann M, Wieferich K, et al. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3058.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1: CD006213. Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1: CD006213.
21.
go back to reference Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, Placer C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(10):863–72.CrossRef Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, Placer C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(10):863–72.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sahebally SM, McMahon G, Walsh SR, Burke JP. Classical Limberg versus classical Karydakis flaps for pilonidal disease—an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon. 2019;17(5):300–8.CrossRef Sahebally SM, McMahon G, Walsh SR, Burke JP. Classical Limberg versus classical Karydakis flaps for pilonidal disease—an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon. 2019;17(5):300–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Prassas D, Rolfs T-M, Schumacher F-J, Krieg A. Karydakis flap reconstruction versus Limberg flap transposition for pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403(5):547–54.CrossRef Prassas D, Rolfs T-M, Schumacher F-J, Krieg A. Karydakis flap reconstruction versus Limberg flap transposition for pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403(5):547–54.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Guner A, Boz A, Ozkan OF, Ileli O, Kece C, Reis E. Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial. World J Surg. 2013;37(9):2074–80.CrossRef Guner A, Boz A, Ozkan OF, Ileli O, Kece C, Reis E. Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial. World J Surg. 2013;37(9):2074–80.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O, Yilmaz M, Yagci G. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200(3):318–27.CrossRef Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O, Yilmaz M, Yagci G. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200(3):318–27.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13720.CrossRef Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13720.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Burnett D, Smith SR, Young CJ. The surgical management of pilonidal disease is uncertain because of high recurrence rates. Cureus. 2018;10: e2625. Burnett D, Smith SR, Young CJ. The surgical management of pilonidal disease is uncertain because of high recurrence rates. Cureus. 2018;10: e2625.
28.
go back to reference Huurman EA, Galema HA, De Raaff C, Toorenvliet B, Smeenk R. Assessment of surgical strategies for pilonidal sinus disease in the Netherlands. Cureus. 2022. Huurman EA, Galema HA, De Raaff C, Toorenvliet B, Smeenk R. Assessment of surgical strategies for pilonidal sinus disease in the Netherlands. Cureus. 2022.
29.
go back to reference Rushfeldt C, Bernstein A, Norderval S, Revhaug A. Introducing an asymmetric cleft lift technique as a uniform procedure for pilonidal sinus surgery. Scand J Surg. 2008;97(1):77–81.CrossRef Rushfeldt C, Bernstein A, Norderval S, Revhaug A. Introducing an asymmetric cleft lift technique as a uniform procedure for pilonidal sinus surgery. Scand J Surg. 2008;97(1):77–81.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gips M, Melki Y, Salem L, Weil R, Sulkes J. Minimal surgery for pilonidal disease using trephines: description of a new technique and long-term outcomes in 1358 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(11):1656–62; discussion 62-3.CrossRef Gips M, Melki Y, Salem L, Weil R, Sulkes J. Minimal surgery for pilonidal disease using trephines: description of a new technique and long-term outcomes in 1358 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(11):1656–62; discussion 62-3.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Khodakaram K, Stark J, Höglund I, Andersson RE. Minimal excision and primary suture is a cost-efficient definitive treatment for pilonidal disease with low morbidity: a population-based interventional and a cross-sectional cohort study. World J Surg. 2017;41(5):1295–302.CrossRef Khodakaram K, Stark J, Höglund I, Andersson RE. Minimal excision and primary suture is a cost-efficient definitive treatment for pilonidal disease with low morbidity: a population-based interventional and a cross-sectional cohort study. World J Surg. 2017;41(5):1295–302.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, Di Lauro K, De Simone G, et al. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic versus conventional treatment of pilonidal sinus. Int J Surg. 2020;74:81–5.CrossRef Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, Di Lauro K, De Simone G, et al. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic versus conventional treatment of pilonidal sinus. Int J Surg. 2020;74:81–5.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fabricius R, Sillesen M, Hansen MS, Beier-Holgersen R. Self-perceived readiness to perform at the attending level following surgical specialist training in Denmark. Dan Med J. 2017;64(10):A5415. Fabricius R, Sillesen M, Hansen MS, Beier-Holgersen R. Self-perceived readiness to perform at the attending level following surgical specialist training in Denmark. Dan Med J. 2017;64(10):A5415.
34.
go back to reference Bauer H, Honselmann KC. Minimum volume standards in surgery—are we there yet? Visc Med. 2017;33(2):106–16.CrossRef Bauer H, Honselmann KC. Minimum volume standards in surgery—are we there yet? Visc Med. 2017;33(2):106–16.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):777–9.CrossRef Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):777–9.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wysocki AP. Defining the learning curve for the modified Karydakis flap. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(12):753–5.CrossRef Wysocki AP. Defining the learning curve for the modified Karydakis flap. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(12):753–5.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Mahmood F, Hussain A, Akingboye A. Pilonidal sinus disease: review of current practice and prospects for endoscopic treatment. Ann Med Surg. 2020;57:212–7.CrossRef Mahmood F, Hussain A, Akingboye A. Pilonidal sinus disease: review of current practice and prospects for endoscopic treatment. Ann Med Surg. 2020;57:212–7.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Album D, Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(1):182–8.CrossRef Album D, Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(1):182–8.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):32.CrossRef Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):32.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(10):1424–30. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(10):1424–30.
Metadata
Title
Surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in Norway: training, attitudes and preferences—a survey among Norwegian surgeons
Authors
Mari Odlo
Julie Horn
Athanasios Xanthoulis
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01889-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue