Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Superior Thoracic Aperture Size is Significantly Associated with Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy

Authors: Shinji Mine, Masayuki Watanabe, Akihiko Okamura, Yu Imamura, Yoshiaki Kajiyama, Takeshi Sano

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The size of the superior thoracic aperture (STA) may be associated with the incidence of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Using computed tomography (CT) images, we retrospectively investigated relationships between the size of the STA and anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy using the retrosternal or posterior mediastinal reconstruction routes.

Methods

Patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy between 2009 and 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective study (n = 326). The size of the STA was measured at the level of the sternal notch using preoperative CT images, and it was determined as the anteroposterior diameter of the STA minus the diameter of the trachea. Associations between clinical factors, including the size of the STA, and anastomotic leakage were determined.

Results

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 44 patients (13.5%). The size of the STA ranged from 0 to 49 mm (median, 16 mm). In univariate analyses, the duration of the operation, tumor location, anastomotic procedure, and the size of the STA were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage. In multivariate analysis, only the size of the STA was independently related to leakage (odds ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.002–1.107; p = 0.027). The size of the STA affected the incidence of leakage more frequently with the posterior mediastinal route than with the retrosternal route.

Conclusions

The size of the STA was significantly associated with the incidence of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, especially when using the posterior mediastinal route.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefPubMed Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg 260:259–266CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg 260:259–266CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C et al (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236:177–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C et al (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236:177–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference van Rossum PS, Haverkamp L, Carvello M et al (2017) Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 30:1–8 van Rossum PS, Haverkamp L, Carvello M et al (2017) Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 30:1–8
6.
go back to reference Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H et al (2013) Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257:238–248CrossRefPubMed Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H et al (2013) Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257:238–248CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M et al (2015) Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications. J Am Coll Surg 220:e13–e16CrossRefPubMed Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M et al (2015) Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications. J Am Coll Surg 220:e13–e16CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Anegg U, Lindenmann J, Maier A et al (2008) Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses. Br J Surg 95:344–349CrossRefPubMed Anegg U, Lindenmann J, Maier A et al (2008) Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses. Br J Surg 95:344–349CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Zhai C, Liu Y, Li W et al (2015) A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 7:2352–2358PubMedPubMedCentral Zhai C, Liu Y, Li W et al (2015) A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 7:2352–2358PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Van Daele E, Van de Putte D, Ceelen W et al (2016) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomydagger. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 22:32–37CrossRefPubMed Van Daele E, Van de Putte D, Ceelen W et al (2016) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomydagger. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 22:32–37CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tsutsui S, Moriguchi S, Morita M et al (1992) Multivariate analysis of postoperative complications after esophageal resection. Ann Thorac Surg 53:1052–1056CrossRefPubMed Tsutsui S, Moriguchi S, Morita M et al (1992) Multivariate analysis of postoperative complications after esophageal resection. Ann Thorac Surg 53:1052–1056CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fischer C, Lingsma H, Hardwick R et al (2016) Risk adjustment models for short-term outcomes after surgical resection for oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 103:105–116CrossRefPubMed Fischer C, Lingsma H, Hardwick R et al (2016) Risk adjustment models for short-term outcomes after surgical resection for oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 103:105–116CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kechagias A, van Rossum PS, Ruurda JP et al (2016) Ischemic conditioning of the stomach in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1614–1623CrossRefPubMed Kechagias A, van Rossum PS, Ruurda JP et al (2016) Ischemic conditioning of the stomach in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1614–1623CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET et al (2015) Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 262:74–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET et al (2015) Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 262:74–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Yamana I, Takeno S, Shibata R et al (2015) Is the geriatric nutritional risk index a significant predictor of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy? Eur Surg Res 55:35–42CrossRefPubMed Yamana I, Takeno S, Shibata R et al (2015) Is the geriatric nutritional risk index a significant predictor of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy? Eur Surg Res 55:35–42CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vande Walle C, Ceelen WP, Boterberg T et al (2012) Anastomotic complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e513–e519CrossRefPubMed Vande Walle C, Ceelen WP, Boterberg T et al (2012) Anastomotic complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e513–e519CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Makino H, Akiyama H et al (2008) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage in the neck after retrosternal reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 55:98–102PubMed Kunisaki C, Makino H, Akiyama H et al (2008) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage in the neck after retrosternal reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 55:98–102PubMed
19.
go back to reference Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
20.
go back to reference Watanabe M, Etoh K, Nagai Y et al (2011) Feeding tube insertion through the round ligament of liver: a safe approach to placing a feeding tube for retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 213:e21–e22CrossRefPubMed Watanabe M, Etoh K, Nagai Y et al (2011) Feeding tube insertion through the round ligament of liver: a safe approach to placing a feeding tube for retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 213:e21–e22CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Altorki N, Lerut T (2007) Three-field lymph node dissection for cancer of the esophagus. In: Patterson GA, Cooper JD, Deslauriers J et al (eds) 3rd Pearson’s thoracic and esophageal surgery. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Philadelphia, Amsterdam, pp 608–612 Altorki N, Lerut T (2007) Three-field lymph node dissection for cancer of the esophagus. In: Patterson GA, Cooper JD, Deslauriers J et al (eds) 3rd Pearson’s thoracic and esophageal surgery. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Philadelphia, Amsterdam, pp 608–612
23.
go back to reference Nakashima Y, Saeki H, Yukaya T et al (2016) Blood flow assessment with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for pedicled omental flap on cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222:e67–e69CrossRefPubMed Nakashima Y, Saeki H, Yukaya T et al (2016) Blood flow assessment with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for pedicled omental flap on cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222:e67–e69CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Superior Thoracic Aperture Size is Significantly Associated with Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy
Authors
Shinji Mine
Masayuki Watanabe
Akihiko Okamura
Yu Imamura
Yoshiaki Kajiyama
Takeshi Sano
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4047-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

World Journal of Surgery 10/2017 Go to the issue