Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 7/2006

01-07-2006

Successful Voiding After Trial Without Catheter Is Not Synonymous With Recovery of Bladder Function After Colorectal Surgery

Authors: Sanjay Chaudhri, M.S., F.R.C.S., Karthik Maruthachalam, M.S., F.R.C.S., Ann Kaiser, Dip. R.G.N., Wendy Robson, Dip. R.G.N., Robert S. Pickard, M.D., F.R.C.S. (Urol.), Alan F. Horgan, M.D., F.R.C.S. (Gen. Surg.)

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 7/2006

Login to get access

Purpose

The need for monitoring postoperative urine output and the possibility of lower urinary tract dysfunction following colorectal surgery necessitates temporary urinary drainage. Current practice assumes recovery of lower urinary tract function to coincide with successful micturition after removal of urethral catheter. The aim of this study was to analyze the recovery of bladder function following colorectal surgery.

Methods

Patients undergoing colorectal operations underwent preoperative and postoperative uroflowmetry and residual urine estimation. All patients were catheterized suprapubically at surgery. Uroflowmetry and postvoid residual volumes were recorded postoperatively until recovery of bladder function was complete.

Results

Thirty consecutive patients underwent suprapubic catheterization, 25 of whom completed the study. Seventeen (68 percent) patients were able to pass urine within 72 hours of surgery. Recovery of lower urinary tract function was delayed in patients undergoing rectal vs. colonic resections (median, 6 vs. 3 days, P = 0.0015). Postvoid residual volumes greater than 200 ml were noted in three (20 percent) patients following rectal resections beyond the tenth postoperative day, with complete emptying achieved by six weeks.

Conclusions

Apparent successful micturition following rectal resections does not always indicate recovery of bladder function. The use of suprapubic catheters, in addition to being safe and effective, allows assessment of residual volumes postoperatively and smoothes the path to full recovery of lower urinary tract function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Basse, L, Werner, M, Kehlet, H 2000Is urinary drainage necessary during continuous epidural analgesia after colonic resection?Reg Anesth Pain Med25498501PubMedCrossRef Basse, L, Werner, M, Kehlet, H 2000Is urinary drainage necessary during continuous epidural analgesia after colonic resection?Reg Anesth Pain Med25498501PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Benoist, S, Panis, Y, Denet, C, Mauvais, F, Mariani, P, Valleur, P 1999Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trialSurgery25135141 Benoist, S, Panis, Y, Denet, C, Mauvais, F, Mariani, P, Valleur, P 1999Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trialSurgery25135141
3.
go back to reference Perrin, LC, Penfold, C, McLeish, A 1997A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing suprapubic with urethral catheterization in rectal surgeryANZ J Surg67554556 Perrin, LC, Penfold, C, McLeish, A 1997A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing suprapubic with urethral catheterization in rectal surgeryANZ J Surg67554556
4.
go back to reference O'Kelly, TJ, Mathew, A, Ross, S, Munro, A 1995Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic vs. urethral catheterizationBr J Surg8213671368PubMed O'Kelly, TJ, Mathew, A, Ross, S, Munro, A 1995Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic vs. urethral catheterizationBr J Surg8213671368PubMed
5.
go back to reference Vandoni, RE, Lironi, A, Tschantz, P 1994Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic vs. urethral route: a prospective randomized trialActa Chir Belg941216PubMed Vandoni, RE, Lironi, A, Tschantz, P 1994Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic vs. urethral route: a prospective randomized trialActa Chir Belg941216PubMed
6.
go back to reference Branagan, GW, Moran, BJ 2002Published evidence favors the use of suprapubic catheters in pelvic colorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum4511041108PubMedCrossRef Branagan, GW, Moran, BJ 2002Published evidence favors the use of suprapubic catheters in pelvic colorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum4511041108PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ichsan, J, Hunt, DR 1987Suprapubic catheters: a comparison of suprapubic vs. urethral catheters in the treatment of acute urinary retentionANZ J Surg573336 Ichsan, J, Hunt, DR 1987Suprapubic catheters: a comparison of suprapubic vs. urethral catheters in the treatment of acute urinary retentionANZ J Surg573336
8.
go back to reference Sethia, KK, Selkon, JB, Berry, AR, Turner, CM, Kettlewell, MG, Gough, MH 1987Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral vs. suprapubic catheterizationBr J Surg74624625PubMed Sethia, KK, Selkon, JB, Berry, AR, Turner, CM, Kettlewell, MG, Gough, MH 1987Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral vs. suprapubic catheterizationBr J Surg74624625PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kneist, W, Junginger, T 2004Residual urine volume after total mesorectal excision: an indicator of pelvic autonomic nerve preservation? Results of a control studyColorectal Dis6432437PubMedCrossRef Kneist, W, Junginger, T 2004Residual urine volume after total mesorectal excision: an indicator of pelvic autonomic nerve preservation? Results of a control studyColorectal Dis6432437PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kneist, W, Heintz, A, Junginger, T 2005Major urinary dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal carcinomaBr J Surg92230234PubMedCrossRef Kneist, W, Heintz, A, Junginger, T 2005Major urinary dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal carcinomaBr J Surg92230234PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Neal, DE, Williams, NS, Johnston, D 1981A prospective study of bladder function before and after sphincter-saving resections for low carcinoma of the rectumBr J Urol53558564PubMedCrossRef Neal, DE, Williams, NS, Johnston, D 1981A prospective study of bladder function before and after sphincter-saving resections for low carcinoma of the rectumBr J Urol53558564PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nesbakken, A, Nygaard, K, Bull-Njaa, T, Carlsen, E, Eri, LM 2000Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBr J Surg87206210PubMedCrossRef Nesbakken, A, Nygaard, K, Bull-Njaa, T, Carlsen, E, Eri, LM 2000Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBr J Surg87206210PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ratnaval, CD, Renwick, P, Farouk, R, Monson, RT, Lee, WR 1996Suprapubic vs. transurethral catheterization of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgeryInt J Colorectal Dis11177179PubMedCrossRef Ratnaval, CD, Renwick, P, Farouk, R, Monson, RT, Lee, WR 1996Suprapubic vs. transurethral catheterization of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgeryInt J Colorectal Dis11177179PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rosseland, L, Stubhaug, A, Breivhik, H 2002Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scannerActa Anaesthesiol Scand46279282PubMedCrossRef Rosseland, L, Stubhaug, A, Breivhik, H 2002Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scannerActa Anaesthesiol Scand46279282PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Viera, A, Merritt, JL, Erickson, RP 1986Renal function in spinal cord injury: a preliminary reportArch Phys Med Rehabil67257259PubMed Viera, A, Merritt, JL, Erickson, RP 1986Renal function in spinal cord injury: a preliminary reportArch Phys Med Rehabil67257259PubMed
16.
go back to reference Walsh, PC 2002Campbells's urology8WB SaundersPhiladelphia Walsh, PC 2002Campbells's urology8WB SaundersPhiladelphia
Metadata
Title
Successful Voiding After Trial Without Catheter Is Not Synonymous With Recovery of Bladder Function After Colorectal Surgery
Authors
Sanjay Chaudhri, M.S., F.R.C.S.
Karthik Maruthachalam, M.S., F.R.C.S.
Ann Kaiser, Dip. R.G.N.
Wendy Robson, Dip. R.G.N.
Robert S. Pickard, M.D., F.R.C.S. (Urol.)
Alan F. Horgan, M.D., F.R.C.S. (Gen. Surg.)
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 7/2006
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0540-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2006

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 7/2006 Go to the issue

Letters to the Editor

The Author Replies

Letters to the Editor

The Author Replies