Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Paper

Subsequent contralateral hip fractures: can at-risk patients be identified? An observational study of 5,102 patients

Authors: Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum, Valér Džupa, Radek Bartoška, Daniel Říha, Petr Waldauf, Václav Báča

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate a sample of patients who sustained hip fractures during the years 1997–2011 and identify risk factors for a subsequent contralateral hip fracture; one-year mortality rates were compared in both groups.

Methods

A total of 5,102 patients with hip fractures were prospectively studied to identify patients who had also suffered a subsequent, contralateral, hip fracture (SCHF). Those patients who had sustained a second fracture within 18 months of the initial fracture were then studied. All data were statistically processed.

Results

Within 18 months of the first fracture, a SCHF occurred in 105 patients (2.1 %). These patients were an average of three years older than those in the single fracture group. Risk factors for the development of a SCHF included: female gender, residing in a residential care facility, and limited mobility prior to injury. Trochanteric fractures did not represent a statistically significant risk factor for SCHF. More than three-quarters of patients with subsequent injuries suffered the same type of fractures on the opposite side. Patients with subsequent fractures had lower one-year mortality rates than patients with only one fracture.

Conclusion

Patients at greatest risk for a SCHF were women with limited mobility who resided in nursing homes for the elderly. The lower mortality rate associated with second fractures shows that the prognosis for such patients is good. Since the at-risk group is so well defined, prophylactic measures for these patients should be utilized in order to minimize the risk of additional fractures.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1550CrossRefPubMed Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1550CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stevens JA, Rudd RA (2013) The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int 24:2725–2728CrossRefPubMed Stevens JA, Rudd RA (2013) The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int 24:2725–2728CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Skála-Rosenbaum J, Bartoníček J, Říha D, Waldauf P, Džupa V (2011) Single-center study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997–2007. Int Orthop 35:587–593CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Skála-Rosenbaum J, Bartoníček J, Říha D, Waldauf P, Džupa V (2011) Single-center study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997–2007. Int Orthop 35:587–593CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Center JR, Emaus N, Tell GS (2012) Hip fractures in Norway 1999–2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fractures rates: a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 27:807–884CrossRefPubMed Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Center JR, Emaus N, Tell GS (2012) Hip fractures in Norway 1999–2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fractures rates: a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 27:807–884CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goldhahn J, Vestergaard P, Bachmann L (2013) The individual risk for contralateral hip fracture after the first one: a simple algorithm based on a nationwide Danish cohort study. Bone Joint J 95-B(16):44 Goldhahn J, Vestergaard P, Bachmann L (2013) The individual risk for contralateral hip fracture after the first one: a simple algorithm based on a nationwide Danish cohort study. Bone Joint J 95-B(16):44
9.
go back to reference Lawrence TM, Wenn R, Boulton CT, Moran CG (2010) Age-specific incidence of first and second fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 92-B:258–261CrossRef Lawrence TM, Wenn R, Boulton CT, Moran CG (2010) Age-specific incidence of first and second fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 92-B:258–261CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Angthong C, Suntharapa T, Harnroongroj T (2009) Major risk factors for second contralateral hip fracture in the elderly. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 43:193–198CrossRefPubMed Angthong C, Suntharapa T, Harnroongroj T (2009) Major risk factors for second contralateral hip fracture in the elderly. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 43:193–198CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dretakis KE, Dretakis EK, Papakitsou EF, Psarakis S, Steriopoulos K (1998) Possible predisposing factors for the second hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 62:366–369CrossRefPubMed Dretakis KE, Dretakis EK, Papakitsou EF, Psarakis S, Steriopoulos K (1998) Possible predisposing factors for the second hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 62:366–369CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schrøder HM, Petersen KK, Erlandsen M (1993) Occurrence and incidence of the second hip fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 289:166–169PubMed Schrøder HM, Petersen KK, Erlandsen M (1993) Occurrence and incidence of the second hip fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 289:166–169PubMed
13.
go back to reference Vochteloo AJH, Borger van der Burg BLS, Röling MA, van Leeuwen DH, van der Berg P, Niggebrugge AHP et al (2012) Contralateral hip fractures and other osteoporosis-related fractures in hip fracture patients: incidence and risk factors. An observational cohort study of 1229 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1191–1197CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Vochteloo AJH, Borger van der Burg BLS, Röling MA, van Leeuwen DH, van der Berg P, Niggebrugge AHP et al (2012) Contralateral hip fractures and other osteoporosis-related fractures in hip fracture patients: incidence and risk factors. An observational cohort study of 1229 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1191–1197CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, Hutchison JD, Gregori A, Reid D (2012) Outcome after sequential hip fracture in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg 94-A:1801–1808CrossRef Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, Hutchison JD, Gregori A, Reid D (2012) Outcome after sequential hip fracture in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg 94-A:1801–1808CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Omsland TK, Emaus N, Tell GS, Ahmed LA, Center JR, Nguyen ND et al (2013) Ten-year risk of second hip fracture. A NOREPOS study. Bone 52:493–497CrossRefPubMed Omsland TK, Emaus N, Tell GS, Ahmed LA, Center JR, Nguyen ND et al (2013) Ten-year risk of second hip fracture. A NOREPOS study. Bone 52:493–497CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sawalha S, Parker MJ (2012) Characteristics and outcome in patients sustaining a second contralateral fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 94-B:102–106CrossRef Sawalha S, Parker MJ (2012) Characteristics and outcome in patients sustaining a second contralateral fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 94-B:102–106CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shabat S, Gepstein R, Mann G, Kish B, Fredman B, Nyska M (2003) The second hip fracture-an analysis of 84 elderly patients. J Orthop Trauma 17:613–617CrossRefPubMed Shabat S, Gepstein R, Mann G, Kish B, Fredman B, Nyska M (2003) The second hip fracture-an analysis of 84 elderly patients. J Orthop Trauma 17:613–617CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Saxena P, Shankar J (2000) Contralateral hip fractures – can predisposing factors be determined? Injury 31:421–424CrossRefPubMed Saxena P, Shankar J (2000) Contralateral hip fractures – can predisposing factors be determined? Injury 31:421–424CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pearse EO, Redfern DJ, Sinha M, Edge AJ (2003) Outcome following a second hip fracture. Injury 34:518–521CrossRefPubMed Pearse EO, Redfern DJ, Sinha M, Edge AJ (2003) Outcome following a second hip fracture. Injury 34:518–521CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Faucett SC, Genuario JW, Tosteson AN, Koval KJ (2010) Is prophylactic fixation a cost-effective method to prevent a future contralateral fragility hip fracture? J Orthop Trauma 24:65–74CrossRefPubMed Faucett SC, Genuario JW, Tosteson AN, Koval KJ (2010) Is prophylactic fixation a cost-effective method to prevent a future contralateral fragility hip fracture? J Orthop Trauma 24:65–74CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Weatherall M (1999) Contralateral fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg 81-B:77–79CrossRef Weatherall M (1999) Contralateral fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg 81-B:77–79CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lönnroos E, Kautiainen H, Karppi P, Hartikainen S, Kiviranta I, Sulkava R (2007) Incidence of second hip fractures. A population-based study. Osteoporos Int 18:1279–1285CrossRefPubMed Lönnroos E, Kautiainen H, Karppi P, Hartikainen S, Kiviranta I, Sulkava R (2007) Incidence of second hip fractures. A population-based study. Osteoporos Int 18:1279–1285CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Singh S, Sun H, Anis AH (2004) Cost-effectiveness of hip protectors in the prevention of osteoporosis related hip fractures in elderly nursing home residents. J Rheumatol 31:1607–1613PubMed Singh S, Sun H, Anis AH (2004) Cost-effectiveness of hip protectors in the prevention of osteoporosis related hip fractures in elderly nursing home residents. J Rheumatol 31:1607–1613PubMed
25.
go back to reference Colon-Emeric CS, Datta SK, Matchar DB (2003) An economic analysis of external hip protector use in ambulatory nursing facility residents. Age Ageing 32:47–52CrossRefPubMed Colon-Emeric CS, Datta SK, Matchar DB (2003) An economic analysis of external hip protector use in ambulatory nursing facility residents. Age Ageing 32:47–52CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Subsequent contralateral hip fractures: can at-risk patients be identified? An observational study of 5,102 patients
Authors
Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum
Valér Džupa
Radek Bartoška
Daniel Říha
Petr Waldauf
Václav Báča
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2646-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

International Orthopaedics 4/2015 Go to the issue