Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2013

01-01-2013 | General Gynecology

Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination: a randomized clinical trial

Authors: Fateme Davari Tanha, Tahmineh Golgachi, Nasrin Niroomand, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh, Reza Nasr

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purposes

To evaluate the efficacy of two routes of administration of misoprostol (sublingual and vaginal) for medical termination of second trimester pregnancies.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-four women referred for second trimester termination were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial. They were divided to receive 400 μg every 6 h misoprostol either sublingually or vaginally. They were followed for 48 h, at which point they underwent D&C if the termination was not complete. Efficacy was defined as successful termination without the need for interventions.

Results

There were no differences between the vaginal and sublingual groups in terms of tablets mean dose of misoprostol applied (1360 ± 2.4 vs. 1320 ± 2.3) or endometrial thickness after termination of pregnancy (13.02 ± 5.2 vs. 13.3 ± 6.6 mm). The success rate was 61.2 % (n = 41) in the vaginal group versus 70.1 % (n = 47) in the sublingual group (p = 0.3). Twenty-six patients (38.8 %) in the vaginal group underwent D&C due to retained tissue, compared with 20 patients (29.8 %) in the sublingual group. In primigravids, the success rate was significantly higher in the sublingual group than vaginal group. There was no significant difference with regards to complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

The sublingual route of misoprostol administration has the same efficacy as the vaginal route and can be applied for second trimester pregnancy termination in primigravid women in outpatient settings due to its simple administrations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kunwar S, Saha PK, Goel P, Huria A, Tandon R, Sehgal A (2010) Second trimester pregnancy termination with 400 μg vaginal misoprostol: efficacy and safety. BioScience Trends 4:351–354PubMed Kunwar S, Saha PK, Goel P, Huria A, Tandon R, Sehgal A (2010) Second trimester pregnancy termination with 400 μg vaginal misoprostol: efficacy and safety. BioScience Trends 4:351–354PubMed
2.
go back to reference Boza AV, de León RG, Castillo LS, Mariño DR, Mitchell EM (2008) Misoprostol preferable to ethacridine lactate for abortions at 13–20 weeks of pregnancy: Cuban experience. Reprod Health Matters 16(Suppl 31):189–195PubMedCrossRef Boza AV, de León RG, Castillo LS, Mariño DR, Mitchell EM (2008) Misoprostol preferable to ethacridine lactate for abortions at 13–20 weeks of pregnancy: Cuban experience. Reprod Health Matters 16(Suppl 31):189–195PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Dickinson JE, Godfrey M, Evans SF (1998) Efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol in second-trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Med 7:115–119PubMedCrossRef Dickinson JE, Godfrey M, Evans SF (1998) Efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol in second-trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Med 7:115–119PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lalitkumar S, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2007) Midtrimester induced abortion: a review. Hum Reprod Update 13:37–52PubMedCrossRef Lalitkumar S, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2007) Midtrimester induced abortion: a review. Hum Reprod Update 13:37–52PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M (2004) Oral, rectal and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprosol. Obstet Gynecol 103:866–870PubMedCrossRef Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M (2004) Oral, rectal and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprosol. Obstet Gynecol 103:866–870PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Honkanen H, Piaggio G, Hertzen H et al (2004) WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion. BJOG 111(7):715–725PubMedCrossRef Honkanen H, Piaggio G, Hertzen H et al (2004) WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion. BJOG 111(7):715–725PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jain JK, Mishell DR Jr (1996) A comparison of misoprostol with and without laminaria tents for induction of second-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:173–177PubMedCrossRef Jain JK, Mishell DR Jr (1996) A comparison of misoprostol with and without laminaria tents for induction of second-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:173–177PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jain JK, Kuo J, Mishell DR Jr (1999) A comparison of two dosing regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Obstet Gynecol 93:571–575PubMedCrossRef Jain JK, Kuo J, Mishell DR Jr (1999) A comparison of two dosing regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Obstet Gynecol 93:571–575PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nuutila M, Toivonen J, Ylikorkala O, Halmesmaki E (1997) A comparison between two doses of intravaginal misoprostol and gemeprost for induction of second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol 90:896–900PubMedCrossRef Nuutila M, Toivonen J, Ylikorkala O, Halmesmaki E (1997) A comparison between two doses of intravaginal misoprostol and gemeprost for induction of second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol 90:896–900PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P (1998) Second trimester abortion using intravaginal misoprostol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 60:161–165PubMedCrossRef Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P (1998) Second trimester abortion using intravaginal misoprostol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 60:161–165PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bugalho A, Bique C, Almeida L, Faundes A (1993) The effectiveness of intravaginal misoprostol (Cytotec) in inducing abortion after eleven weeks of pregnancy. Stud Fam Plann 24:319–323PubMedCrossRef Bugalho A, Bique C, Almeida L, Faundes A (1993) The effectiveness of intravaginal misoprostol (Cytotec) in inducing abortion after eleven weeks of pregnancy. Stud Fam Plann 24:319–323PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Wojdyla D, Huong NTM, Marions L, Okoev G et al (2009) Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial. Hum Reprod 24:106–112CrossRef von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Wojdyla D, Huong NTM, Marions L, Okoev G et al (2009) Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial. Hum Reprod 24:106–112CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tang OS, Lau WNT, Chan CCW, Ho PC (2004) A prospective randomised comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy. BJOG 111:1001–1005PubMedCrossRef Tang OS, Lau WNT, Chan CCW, Ho PC (2004) A prospective randomised comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy. BJOG 111:1001–1005PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aronsson A, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2004) Effects of misoprostol on uterine contractility following different routes of administration. Hum Reprod 19:81–84PubMedCrossRef Aronsson A, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2004) Effects of misoprostol on uterine contractility following different routes of administration. Hum Reprod 19:81–84PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Krzymowski T, Stefan′czyk-Krzymowska S, Koziorowski M (1989) Counter current transfer of PGF2 alpha in the mesometrial vessels as a mechanism for prevention of luteal regression in early pregnancy. Acta Physiol Pol 40:23–34PubMed Krzymowski T, Stefan′czyk-Krzymowska S, Koziorowski M (1989) Counter current transfer of PGF2 alpha in the mesometrial vessels as a mechanism for prevention of luteal regression in early pregnancy. Acta Physiol Pol 40:23–34PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tanha FD, Feizi M, Shariat M (2010) Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the management of missed abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36:525–532PubMedCrossRef Tanha FD, Feizi M, Shariat M (2010) Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the management of missed abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36:525–532PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Doger E, Ozeren S, Dilbaz B (2005) Randomized comparison of 3 misoprostol protocols for abortion induction at 13–20 weeks of gestation. J Reprod Med 50:173–180PubMed Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Doger E, Ozeren S, Dilbaz B (2005) Randomized comparison of 3 misoprostol protocols for abortion induction at 13–20 weeks of gestation. J Reprod Med 50:173–180PubMed
19.
go back to reference Saxena P, Salhan S, Sarda N (2004) Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions. Hum Reprod 19:1–4CrossRef Saxena P, Salhan S, Sarda N (2004) Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions. Hum Reprod 19:1–4CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tang OS, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC (2007) Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(Suppl 2):S160–S167PubMedCrossRef Tang OS, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC (2007) Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(Suppl 2):S160–S167PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nanda K, Peloggia A, Grimes D, Lopez L, Nanda G (2006) Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:CD003518 Nanda K, Peloggia A, Grimes D, Lopez L, Nanda G (2006) Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:CD003518
Metadata
Title
Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination: a randomized clinical trial
Authors
Fateme Davari Tanha
Tahmineh Golgachi
Nasrin Niroomand
Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
Reza Nasr
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2508-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2013 Go to the issue