Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Study protocol

Study protocol for the evaluation of an Infant Simulator based program delivered in schools: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Sally A Brinkman, Sarah E Johnson, David Lawrence, James P Codde, Michael B Hart, Judith AY Straton, Sven Silburn

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This paper presents the study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a school based program developed to prevent teenage pregnancy. The program includes students taking care of an Infant Simulator; despite growing popularity and an increasing global presence of such programs, there is no published evidence of their long-term impact. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the Virtual Infant Parenting (VIP) program by investigating pre-conceptual health and risk behaviours, teen pregnancy and the resultant birth outcomes, early child health and maternal health.

Methods and Design

Fifty-seven schools (86% of 66 eligible secondary schools) in Perth, Australia were recruited to the clustered (by school) randomised trial, with even randomisation to the intervention and control arms. Between 2003 and 2006, the VIP program was administered to 1,267 participants in the intervention schools, while 1,567 participants in the non-intervention schools received standard curriculum. Participants were all female and aged between 13-15 years upon recruitment. Pre and post-intervention questionnaires measured short-term impact and participants are now being followed through their teenage years via data linkage to hospital medical records, abortion clinics and education records. Participants who have a live birth are interviewed by face-to-face interview. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and proportional hazards regression will test for differences in pregnancy, birth and abortion rates during the teenage years between the study arms.

Discussion

This protocol paper provides a detailed overview of the trial design as well as initial results in the form of participant flow. The authors describe the intervention and its delivery within the natural school setting and discuss the practical issues in the conduct of the trial, including recruitment. The trial is pragmatic and will directly inform those who provide Infant Simulator based programs in school settings.

Trial registration

ISRCTN24952438
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
UNICEF: A league table of teenage births in rich nations. 2001, Florence, Italy: UNICEF
3.
Skinner RS, Hickey M: Current priorities for adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003, 179: 158-161.PubMed
4.
van der Klis K, Westenberg L, Chan A, Dekker G, Keane RJ: Teenage pregnancy: Trends, characteristics and outcomes in South Australia and Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2002, 26: 125-131. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00904.x.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: A Picture of Australia's Children. 2009, Canberra: AIHW
6.
The sexual and reproductive health of young Victorians. A collaborative project between: Family Planning Victoria. Royal Women's Hospital. Centre for Adolescent Health
7.
Bonell CJ, Strange VJ, Stephenson JM, Oakley AR, Copas AJ, Forrest SP, Johnson AM, Black S: Effect of social exclusion on the risk of teenage pregnancy: development of hypotheses using baseline data from a randomised trial of sex education. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health. 2003, 57: 871-876. 10.1136/jech.57.11.871.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
9.
10.
11.
Hart MB, Cochrane K, Quinn C: Positive Pre-Conception Partnerships: The Essential Ingredient for Good Mental Health. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion. 2000, 2: 26-32.
12.
Cochrane K, Di Francesco A, McGaw A, Hart B: The Nest Enhancement Pilot Project. 1997, Swan Hills Division of General Practitioners Ltd
13.
14.
15.
Fogg BJ, Cuellar G, Danielson D: Motivating, influencing and pursuading users: An introduction to captology. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Edited by: Sears A, Jacko JA. 2007, CRC Press
16.
McCormack B, Sim MG: Teen pregnancy: A program for awareness and health education. Australian Family Physician. 2005, 34: 17-20.PubMed
17.
18.
19.
Strachan W, Gorey KM: Infant Simulator lifespace intervention: Pilot investigation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal. 1997, 14: 171-CrossRef
20.
Kralewski J, Stevens-Simon C: Does mothering a doll change teens' thoughts about pregnancy?. Pediatrics. 2000, 105: 30-34. 10.1542/peds.105.3.e30.CrossRef
21.
Out JW, Lafreniere KD: Baby Think It Over: Using role-play to prevent teen pregnancy. Adolescence. 2001, 36: 571-582.PubMed
22.
Somers CL, Fahlman MM: Effectiveness of the "Baby Think It Over" teen pregnancy prevention program. The Journal of School Health. 2001, 71: 188-195. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2001.tb07314.x.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Tingle LR: Evaluation of the North Carolina "Baby Think It Over" project. The Journal of School Health. 2002, 72: 178-183. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06543.x.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Barnett JE, Hurst CS: Do adolescents take "Baby Think It Over" seriously?. Adolescence. 2004, 39: 65-75.PubMed
25.
Didion J, Gatzke H: The Baby Think It Over experience to prevent teen pregnancy: A post intervention evaluation. Public Health Nursing. 2004, 21: 331-337. 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.21406.x.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Roberts SW, McCowan RJ: The effectiveness of Infant Simulators. Adolescence. 2004, 39: 475-487.PubMed
27.
Barnett JE: Evaluating "Baby Think It Over" Infant Simulators: A comparison group study. Adolescence. 2006, 41: 8442-8449.
28.
de Anda D: Baby think it over: Evaluation of an infant simulation intervention for adolescent pregnancy prevention. Health & Social Work. 2006, 31: 26-35.CrossRef
29.
Guyatt GH, DiCenso A, Farewell V, Willan A, Griffith L: Randomized trials versus observational studies in adolescent pregnancy prevention. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000, 53: 167-174. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00160-2.CrossRefPubMed
30.
DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Griffith WL: Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal. 2002, 324: 1426-1430. 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1426.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Kirby D: Reflections on two decades of research on teen sexual behavior and pregnancy. The Journal of School Health. 1999, 69: 89-94. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb07214.x.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Bennett SE, Assefi NP: School-based teenage pregnancy prevention programs: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005, 36: 72-81. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.11.097.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. British Medical Journal. 2004, 328: 702-708. 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D: Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008, 337: a2390-10.1136/bmj.a2390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Australian Bureau of Statistics: 3101.0 Australian Demographic Statistics. 2009, Australian Government
36.
Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: Social Cognitive Theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall
37.
Bandura A: Social Learning Theory. 1997, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall
38.
Prochaska JO, DiClimente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist. 1992, 1102-1114. 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102.
39.
Prochaska JO, Velicer W: Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviours. Health Psychology. 1994, 13: 39-46. 10.1037/0278-6133.13.1.39.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Holman C, Bass A, Rosman D, Smith M, Semmens J, Glasson E, Brook E, Trutwein B, Rouse I, Watson C: A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system. Australian Health Review. 2008, 32: 766-777. 10.1071/AH080766.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Kessler R, Mroczek D: Final Version of our Non-specific Psychological Distress Scale [memo dated 10/3/94]. 1994, Ann Arbor (MI): Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research. University of Michigan
42.
Eysenck SBG, Pearson PR, Easting G, Allsopp JF: Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences. 1985, 6: 613-619. 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90011-X.CrossRef
43.
Schoenfeld DARJ: Nomograms for Calculating the Number of Patients Needed for a Clinical Trial With Survival as an Endpoint. Biometrics. 1982, 38: 163-170. 10.2307/2530299.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Connor M, Norman P: Predicting Health Behaviour. 1996, Buckingham
45.
Pratt S: Personal communication. 2005, Australian distributer of the Infant Simulators, Australian distributer of the Infant Simulators
46.
Kim CR, Free C: Recent evaluations of the peer-led approach in adolescent sexual health education: A systematic review. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2008, 34: 89-96. 10.1363/3408908.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Hillman CB: The effectiveness of an Infant Simulator as a deterrent to teen pregnancy among middle school students. Ph.D. 2000, University of North Texas
48.
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Feature Article - The impact of migration on Western Australia's population. 2004, Australian Bureau of Statistics
49.
Galea S, Tracy M: Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies. Annals of Epidemiology. 2007, 17: 643-653. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Olson SH: Reported Participation in Case-Control Studies: Changes over Time. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 154: 574-581. 10.1093/aje/154.6.574.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Aarons S, Rose A, Walker J, Lyles B, Jenkins R, Raine T: Enhancing recruitment and data quality in a junior high school-based teen pregnancy prevention study. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2001, 24: 277-285. 10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00019-2.CrossRef
52.
Tigges BB: Parental consent and adolescent risk behavior research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2003, 35: 283-289. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00283.x.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Strachan W, Gorey KM: Infant Simulator lifespace intervention: Pilot investigation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 1997, 14: 171-180. 10.1023/A:1024565502423.CrossRef
54.
Dent CW, Galaif J, Sussman S, Stacy A, Burtun D, Flay BR: Demographic, psychosocial and behavioral differences in samples of actively and passively consented adolescents. Addictive Behaviors. 1993, 18: 51-56. 10.1016/0306-4603(93)90008-W.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Study protocol for the evaluation of an Infant Simulator based program delivered in schools: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Sally A Brinkman
Sarah E Johnson
David Lawrence
James P Codde
Michael B Hart
Judith AY Straton
Sven Silburn
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-100

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Trials 1/2010 Go to the issue

Study protocol

The EVERT (effective verruca treatments) trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae

Review

Managing clinical trials

Study protocol

A GP caregiver needs toolkit versus usual care in the management of the needs of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Research

Effects of a mouthwash with chlorine dioxide on oral malodor and salivary bacteria: a randomized placebo-controlled 7-day trial

Study protocol

Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of a graduated three layer straight tubular bandaging system when compared to a standard short stretch compression bandaging system in the management of people with venous ulceration: 3VSS2008

Study protocol

Evaluation of a toolkit to improve cardiovascular disease screening and treatment for people with type 2 diabetes: protocol for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial