Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Laryngology

Study of the head and neck position in microlaryngoscopy using magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Busheng Tong, Rui Fang, Benjamin L. Smith

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Several studies have critically analyzed the ideal position for laryngeal exposure during microlaryngoscopy; however, these studies have lacked the ability to evaluate the head and neck position while maintaining a direct view into the airway. Therefore, a newly established two-curve methodology was used to investigate the influence of head and neck position during microlaryngoscopy in MRI images. Fourteen normal adult volunteers were used in this magnetic resonance imaging study. The airway was divided into two curves in the sagittal plane at the center of the airway in three head and neck positions: extension–extension, neutral and flexion–extension position. The airway passage curves, point of inflection and its tangent, the line of laryngoscope, line of hyoid bone and mandible were plotted on each scan. Angles and area formed by these lines were calculated to evaluate the airway morphology changes. The flexion–extension position caused a reduction in the area between the line of laryngoscope and curves, but there was no significant difference between the three positions (p = 0.664). The flexion–extension position also resulted in the lowest angle values for α (angle between the tangent and horizon, p = 0.000), β (between the line of hyoid and horizon, p = 0.002) and δ (between the line of mandible and horizon, p = 0.004). Our study provides a better understanding of the changes in normal airway morphology during microlaryngoscopy in different positions, reinforcing the concept that flexion–extension position is the optimal position for microlaryngoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gugatschka M, Gerstenberger C, Friedrich G (2008) Analysis of forces applied during microlaryngoscopy: a descriptive study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(9):1083–1087PubMedCrossRef Gugatschka M, Gerstenberger C, Friedrich G (2008) Analysis of forces applied during microlaryngoscopy: a descriptive study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(9):1083–1087PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fang R, Chen H, Sun J (2012) Analysis of pressure applied during microlaryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(5):1471–1476PubMedCrossRef Fang R, Chen H, Sun J (2012) Analysis of pressure applied during microlaryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(5):1471–1476PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hochman I, Zeitels SM, Heaton JT (1999) Analysis of the forces and position required for direct laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108(8):715–724PubMed Hochman I, Zeitels SM, Heaton JT (1999) Analysis of the forces and position required for direct laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108(8):715–724PubMed
5.
go back to reference Zeitels SM, Vaughan CW (1994) External counterpressure and internal distension for optimal laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior glottal commissure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103(9):669–675PubMed Zeitels SM, Vaughan CW (1994) External counterpressure and internal distension for optimal laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior glottal commissure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103(9):669–675PubMed
6.
go back to reference Friedrich G, Gugatschka M (2009) Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(7):999–1003PubMedCrossRef Friedrich G, Gugatschka M (2009) Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(7):999–1003PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Adnet F, Borron SW, Lapostolle F, Lapandry C (1999) The three axis alignment theory and the ‘sniffing position’: perpetuation of an anatomic myth? Anesthesiology 91:1964–1965PubMedCrossRef Adnet F, Borron SW, Lapostolle F, Lapandry C (1999) The three axis alignment theory and the ‘sniffing position’: perpetuation of an anatomic myth? Anesthesiology 91:1964–1965PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Adnet F, Borron SW, Dumas JL et al (2001) Study of the ‘sniffing position’ by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 94:83–86PubMedCrossRef Adnet F, Borron SW, Dumas JL et al (2001) Study of the ‘sniffing position’ by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 94:83–86PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee L, Weightman WM (2008) Laryngoscopy force in the sniffing position compared to the extension–extension position. Anaesthesia 63(4):375–378PubMedCrossRef Lee L, Weightman WM (2008) Laryngoscopy force in the sniffing position compared to the extension–extension position. Anaesthesia 63(4):375–378PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ, Challis VJ, Irwin MG, Sleigh JW (2010) Changes in airway configuration with different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible clinical applications. Br J Anaesth 105(5):683–690PubMedCrossRef Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ, Challis VJ, Irwin MG, Sleigh JW (2010) Changes in airway configuration with different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible clinical applications. Br J Anaesth 105(5):683–690PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Roh JL, Lee YW (2005) Prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in patients undergoing microlaryngosurgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:614–620PubMed Roh JL, Lee YW (2005) Prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in patients undergoing microlaryngosurgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:614–620PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hsiung MW, Pai L, Kang BH et al (2004) Clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure. Laryngoscope 114:358–363PubMedCrossRef Hsiung MW, Pai L, Kang BH et al (2004) Clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure. Laryngoscope 114:358–363PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pinar E, Calli C, Oncel S, Selek B, Tatar B (2009) Preoperative clinical prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in suspension laryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(5):699–703PubMedCrossRef Pinar E, Calli C, Oncel S, Selek B, Tatar B (2009) Preoperative clinical prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in suspension laryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(5):699–703PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ohno S, Hirano S, Tateya I, Kojima T, Ito J (2011) Management of vocal fold lesions in difficult laryngeal exposure patients in phonomicrosurgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 38(3):373–380PubMedCrossRef Ohno S, Hirano S, Tateya I, Kojima T, Ito J (2011) Management of vocal fold lesions in difficult laryngeal exposure patients in phonomicrosurgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 38(3):373–380PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jackson C (1915) Position of the patient for peroral endoscopy. In: Jackson C (ed) Peroral Endoscopy and Laryngeal Surgery. Laryngoscope Co., St. Louis, pp 77–88 Jackson C (1915) Position of the patient for peroral endoscopy. In: Jackson C (ed) Peroral Endoscopy and Laryngeal Surgery. Laryngoscope Co., St. Louis, pp 77–88
Metadata
Title
Study of the head and neck position in microlaryngoscopy using magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Busheng Tong
Rui Fang
Benjamin L. Smith
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2168-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2013 Go to the issue