Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 1/2007

01-03-2007 | Original Paper

Study comparing two types of screening provision for people with von Hippel-Lindau disease

Authors: Lindsay Fraser, Sally Watts, Anna Cargill, Stephen Sutton, Shirley Hodgson

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL) require life-long surveillance for this multi-system disease. It is therefore important to assess the comprehensiveness of screening provision, as well as identify what type of screening service is most likely to encourage regular patient attendance. This descriptive study reports on two types of screening service: single appointment One Stop (OS) clinics and multiple appointment Ad Hoc (AH) clinics. One hundred and seventeen vHL patients from eight regional genetics centres were approached to take part. Seventy-two (61.5%) returning a completed study questionnaire: fifty-four (75%) were screened at OS clinics and eighteen (25%) at AH clinics. Comprehensiveness of screening, attendance rates, patient ratings of quality of care and levels of psychological morbidity were compared between the two types of service. While levels of disease severity were similar in patients screened at OS and AH clinics, those seen at OS clinics were screened for twice as many site-specific vHL manifestations compared to those seen at AH clinics (< 0.0001). More patients at OS clinics regularly attended their screening appointments compared to those at AH clinics (= 0.0045). There was no difference in the quality of care reported by patients attending the two types of screening service and few problems were reported. Twenty-nine percent of respondents were categorised as clinically anxious and 13% as clinically depressed. These findings suggest that an optimum vHL screening service is one based on OS clinics offering regular comprehensive surveillance and psychological support.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maher ER, Iselius L, Yates JR et al (1991) Von Hippel-Lindau disease: a genetic study. J Med Genet 28:443–447PubMed Maher ER, Iselius L, Yates JR et al (1991) Von Hippel-Lindau disease: a genetic study. J Med Genet 28:443–447PubMed
2.
go back to reference Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J et al (1993) Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science 26:1317–1320CrossRef Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J et al (1993) Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science 26:1317–1320CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Evans DG, Maher ER, Macleod R et al (1997) Uptake of genetic testing for cancer predisposition. J Med Genet 34:746–748PubMedCrossRef Evans DG, Maher ER, Macleod R et al (1997) Uptake of genetic testing for cancer predisposition. J Med Genet 34:746–748PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Glasker S (2005) Central nervous system manifestations in VHL: genetics, pathology and clinical phenotypic features. Fam Cancer 4(1):37–42PubMedCrossRef Glasker S (2005) Central nervous system manifestations in VHL: genetics, pathology and clinical phenotypic features. Fam Cancer 4(1):37–42PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kreusel KM (2005) Ophthalmological manifestations in VHL and NF 1: pathological and diagnostic implications. Fam Cancer 4(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef Kreusel KM (2005) Ophthalmological manifestations in VHL and NF 1: pathological and diagnostic implications. Fam Cancer 4(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kreusel KM, Bechrakis NE, Heinichen T et al (2000) Retinal angiomatosis and von Hippel-Lindau disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(11):916–921PubMedCrossRef Kreusel KM, Bechrakis NE, Heinichen T et al (2000) Retinal angiomatosis and von Hippel-Lindau disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(11):916–921PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R et al (1990) Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Quart J Med 77:1151–1163PubMed Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R et al (1990) Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Quart J Med 77:1151–1163PubMed
8.
go back to reference Maranchie JK, Afonso A, Albert PS et al (2004) Solid renal tumor severity in von Hippel Lindau disease is related to germline deletion length and location. Hum Mutat 23(1):40–46PubMedCrossRef Maranchie JK, Afonso A, Albert PS et al (2004) Solid renal tumor severity in von Hippel Lindau disease is related to germline deletion length and location. Hum Mutat 23(1):40–46PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Opocher G, Conton P, Schiavi F et al (2005) Pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and neurofibromatosis type 1. Fam Cancer 4(1):13–16PubMedCrossRef Opocher G, Conton P, Schiavi F et al (2005) Pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and neurofibromatosis type 1. Fam Cancer 4(1):13–16PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lonser RR, Glenn GM, Walther M et al (2003) von Hippel-Lindau disease. Lancet 361(9374):2059–2067PubMedCrossRef Lonser RR, Glenn GM, Walther M et al (2003) von Hippel-Lindau disease. Lancet 361(9374):2059–2067PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Foulkes WD, Hodgson SV (1998) Inherited susceptibility to cancer: clinical, predictive, and ethical perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press Foulkes WD, Hodgson SV (1998) Inherited susceptibility to cancer: clinical, predictive, and ethical perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
12.
go back to reference Marteau T (1993) Health-related screening: psychological predictors of uptake and impact. In: Maes S, Leventhal H, Johnston M (eds) International review of health psychology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 149–174 Marteau T (1993) Health-related screening: psychological predictors of uptake and impact. In: Maes S, Leventhal H, Johnston M (eds) International review of health psychology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 149–174
13.
go back to reference Jenson CE (1993) Von Hippel-Lindau: a relentless disorder. RN 56(8):36–40PubMed Jenson CE (1993) Von Hippel-Lindau: a relentless disorder. RN 56(8):36–40PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nash TL (1994) Von Hippel-Lindau shouldn’t stand in the way of goals. RN 57:10PubMed Nash TL (1994) Von Hippel-Lindau shouldn’t stand in the way of goals. RN 57:10PubMed
15.
go back to reference Levy M, Richard S (2000) Attitudes of von Hippel-Lindau disease patients towards presymptomatic genetic diagnosis in children and prenatal diagnosis. J Med Genet 37(6):476–478PubMedCrossRef Levy M, Richard S (2000) Attitudes of von Hippel-Lindau disease patients towards presymptomatic genetic diagnosis in children and prenatal diagnosis. J Med Genet 37(6):476–478PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rimes KA, Salkovskis PM (2002) Prediction of psychological reactions to bone density screening for osteoporosis using a cognitive-behavioral model of health anxiety. Behav Res Ther 40:359–381PubMedCrossRef Rimes KA, Salkovskis PM (2002) Prediction of psychological reactions to bone density screening for osteoporosis using a cognitive-behavioral model of health anxiety. Behav Res Ther 40:359–381PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Naik R, Abang-Mohammed K, Tjalma WA et al (2001) The feasibility of a one-stop colposcopy clinic in the management of women with low grade smear abnormalities: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98:205–208PubMedCrossRef Naik R, Abang-Mohammed K, Tjalma WA et al (2001) The feasibility of a one-stop colposcopy clinic in the management of women with low grade smear abnormalities: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98:205–208PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Abu JI, Habiba MA, Baker R et al (2001) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of women’s experience of a one-stop menstrual clinic in comparison with traditional gynaecology clinics. BJOG 108:993–999PubMedCrossRef Abu JI, Habiba MA, Baker R et al (2001) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of women’s experience of a one-stop menstrual clinic in comparison with traditional gynaecology clinics. BJOG 108:993–999PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dey P, Bundred N, Gibbs A et al (2002) Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 324:507PubMedCrossRef Dey P, Bundred N, Gibbs A et al (2002) Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 324:507PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sharma M, Taylor A, Al Khouri A et al (2002) Management of infertility: one stop clinic may offer solution. BMJ 325(7372):1116PubMedCrossRef Sharma M, Taylor A, Al Khouri A et al (2002) Management of infertility: one stop clinic may offer solution. BMJ 325(7372):1116PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Wright JG (2000) The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 25:167–177CrossRef Hudak PL, Wright JG (2000) The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 25:167–177CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Young GJ, Meterko M, Desai KR (2000) Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics. Med Care 38:325–334PubMedCrossRef Young GJ, Meterko M, Desai KR (2000) Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics. Med Care 38:325–334PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen HH et al (2002) Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients’ views. Br J Gen Pract 52:459–462PubMed Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen HH et al (2002) Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients’ views. Br J Gen Pract 52:459–462PubMed
24.
go back to reference Sweeney KG, Gray DP (1995) Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner—are they a vulnerable group? Br J Gen Pract 45:133–135 Sweeney KG, Gray DP (1995) Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner—are they a vulnerable group? Br J Gen Pract 45:133–135
25.
go back to reference Shepperd S, Richards S (2002) Continuity of care—a chameleon concept. J Health Serv Res Policy 7:130–132PubMedCrossRef Shepperd S, Richards S (2002) Continuity of care—a chameleon concept. J Health Serv Res Policy 7:130–132PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Marteau TM, Bekker H (1992) The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 31 (Pt 3):301–306PubMed Marteau TM, Bekker H (1992) The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 31 (Pt 3):301–306PubMed
27.
go back to reference Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370PubMed Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370PubMed
28.
go back to reference Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK et al (1991) Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 10:259–267PubMedCrossRef Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK et al (1991) Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 10:259–267PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK et al (1991) Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 114:657–661PubMed Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK et al (1991) Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 114:657–661PubMed
30.
go back to reference Borowsky SJ, Nelson DB, Fortney JC et al (2002) VA community-based outpatient clinics: performance measures based on patient perceptions of care. Med Care 40:578–586PubMedCrossRef Borowsky SJ, Nelson DB, Fortney JC et al (2002) VA community-based outpatient clinics: performance measures based on patient perceptions of care. Med Care 40:578–586PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS (2005) The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 14(7):517–534PubMedCrossRef Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS (2005) The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 14(7):517–534PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Murray-Garcia JL, Selby JV, Schmittdiel J et al (2000) Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients’ values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care 38(3):300–310PubMedCrossRef Murray-Garcia JL, Selby JV, Schmittdiel J et al (2000) Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients’ values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care 38(3):300–310PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45(12):1829–1843PubMedCrossRef Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45(12):1829–1843PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hargraves JL, Wilson IB, Zaslavsky A et al (2001) Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care 39(6):635–641PubMedCrossRef Hargraves JL, Wilson IB, Zaslavsky A et al (2001) Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care 39(6):635–641PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ren XS, Kazis L, Lee A et al (2001) Health status and satisfaction with health care: a longitudinal study among patients served by the Veterans Health Administration. Am J Med Qual 16(5):166–173PubMed Ren XS, Kazis L, Lee A et al (2001) Health status and satisfaction with health care: a longitudinal study among patients served by the Veterans Health Administration. Am J Med Qual 16(5):166–173PubMed
39.
go back to reference Shuin T, Yamazaki I, Tamura K et al (2004) Recent advances in ideas on the molecular pathology and clinical aspects of Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Int J Clin Oncol 9(4):283–287PubMedCrossRef Shuin T, Yamazaki I, Tamura K et al (2004) Recent advances in ideas on the molecular pathology and clinical aspects of Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Int J Clin Oncol 9(4):283–287PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Study comparing two types of screening provision for people with von Hippel-Lindau disease
Authors
Lindsay Fraser
Sally Watts
Anna Cargill
Stephen Sutton
Shirley Hodgson
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-006-9111-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Familial Cancer 1/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine