Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Case Reports 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Stroke | Case report

Transcranial direct electrical stimulation for hand function in a stroke patient with severe upper limb paralysis due to lenticulostriate artery occlusion: a case report

Authors: Koichiro Hirayama, Takeshi Fuchigami, Shu Morioka

Published in: Journal of Medical Case Reports | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transcranial direct current stimulation, a therapeutic modality to modulate the excitability of injured and uninjured brain hemispheres in stroke patients, is expected to be effective in treating upper limb paralysis. We describe the use of transcranial direct current stimulation to improve the function and frequency of use of the paralyzed hand of a patient with lenticulostriate artery occlusion.

Case presentation

A Japanese man in his fifties developed a left internal hindfoot perforator branch infarction owing to lenticulostriate artery occlusion, and presented with severe right upper and lower limb paralysis. Multiple interventions for the paralyzed hand, primarily robot therapy, did not noticeably change his hand function or frequency of use in daily life. Therefore, transcranial direct current stimulation was used in combination with upper limb functional exercises for 20 minutes a day, five times a week, for 6 weeks. Consequently, scores for the hand items of the Fugl–Meyer Assessment of the upper extremities improved, and pain and subluxation around the shoulder joint were reduced. Furthermore, the frequency of use and the quality of movement of the paralyzed hand were improved.

Conclusions

Upper limb functional training and transcranial direct current stimulation improved the function and frequency of use of the paralyzed hand in a stroke patient with severe upper limb paralysis, suggesting that this combined intervention could effectively improve hand function in patients with severe upper limb paralysis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Langhorne P, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54.CrossRef Langhorne P, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kwakkel G, et al. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281–99.PubMed Kwakkel G, et al. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281–99.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Murase N, et al. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–9.CrossRef Murase N, et al. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nichols-Larsen DS, et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2015;36(7):1480–4.CrossRef Nichols-Larsen DS, et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2015;36(7):1480–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kang N, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:345–55.CrossRef Kang N, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:345–55.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nitsche MA, et al. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–9.CrossRef Nitsche MA, et al. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nitsche MA, et al. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–901.CrossRef Nitsche MA, et al. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–901.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cha H-K, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:363–5.CrossRef Cha H-K, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:363–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hesse S, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:838–46.CrossRef Hesse S, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:838–46.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS): Abeginner7s guide for design and implementation. Front Neurosci. 11, 2017. Transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS): Abeginner7s guide for design and implementation. Front Neurosci. 11, 2017.
11.
go back to reference Amano S, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25:500–8.CrossRef Amano S, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25:500–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takahashi K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Motor Activity Log in Japan. J Japanese Assoc Occup Ther. 2009;28(6):628–36. Takahashi K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Motor Activity Log in Japan. J Japanese Assoc Occup Ther. 2009;28(6):628–36.
14.
go back to reference Jensen MP, Turner JA. Romano JM: what is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain. 1994;58(3):387–92.CrossRef Jensen MP, Turner JA. Romano JM: what is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain. 1994;58(3):387–92.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42(3):257–68.PubMed Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42(3):257–68.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Freund P, Weiskopf N, Ashburner J, et al. MRI investigation of the sensorimotor cortex and the corticospinal tract after acute spinal cord injury: a prospective longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:873–81.CrossRef Freund P, Weiskopf N, Ashburner J, et al. MRI investigation of the sensorimotor cortex and the corticospinal tract after acute spinal cord injury: a prospective longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:873–81.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008;453(7197):869–78.CrossRef Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008;453(7197):869–78.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Transcranial direct electrical stimulation for hand function in a stroke patient with severe upper limb paralysis due to lenticulostriate artery occlusion: a case report
Authors
Koichiro Hirayama
Takeshi Fuchigami
Shu Morioka
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Stroke
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03137-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Medical Case Reports 1/2021 Go to the issue