Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Stroke | Study protocol

An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial

Authors: Kathryn A. Radford, Kristelle Craven, Vicki McLellan, Tracey H. Sach, Richard Brindle, Ivana Holloway, Suzanne Hartley, Audrey Bowen, Rory O’Connor, Judith Stevens, Julie Philips, Marion Walker, Jain Holmes, Christopher McKevitt, John Murray, Caroline Watkins, Katie Powers, Angela Shone, Amanda Farrin

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Return to work (RTW) is achieved by less than 50% of stroke survivors. The rising incidence of stroke among younger people, the UK economic forecast, and clinical drivers highlight the need for stroke survivors to receive support with RTW. However, evidence for this type of support is lacking. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will investigate whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care (UC) (i.e. usual NHS rehabilitation) is more clinically and cost-effective for supporting post-stroke RTW, than UC alone.

Methods

Seven hundred sixty stroke survivors and their carers will be recruited from approximately 20 NHS stroke services. A 5:4 allocation ratio will be employed to randomise participants to receive ESSVR plus UC, or UC alone. The individually tailored ESSVR intervention will commence within 12 weeks of stroke onset and be delivered for up to 12 months as necessary by trained RETAKE occupational therapists in the community, participants’ homes or workplaces, and outpatient/inpatient therapy settings, via telephone, email, or SMS text message. Outcome data will be collected via self-report questionnaires administered by post or online at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome will be self-reported RTW and job retention at 12 months (minimum 2 h/week). Secondary outcomes will include mood, function, participation, health-related quality of life, confidence, intervention compliance, health and social care resource use, and mortality. An embedded economic evaluation will estimate cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses from National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspectives. An embedded process evaluation will employ a mixed methods approach to explore ESSVR implementation, contextual factors linked to outcome variation, and factors affecting NHS roll-out.

Discussion

This article describes the protocol for a multi-centre RCT evaluating the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an early vocational rehabilitation intervention aimed at supporting adults to return to work following a stroke. Evidence favouring the ESSVR intervention would support its roll-out in NHS settings.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN12464275. Registered on 26 February 2018.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Corr S, Wilmer S. Returning to work after a stroke: an important but neglected area. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(5):186–92.CrossRef Corr S, Wilmer S. Returning to work after a stroke: an important but neglected area. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(5):186–92.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frank AO, Thurgood J. Vocational rehabilitation in the UK: opportunities for health-care professionals. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2006;13(3):126–34.CrossRef Frank AO, Thurgood J. Vocational rehabilitation in the UK: opportunities for health-care professionals. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2006;13(3):126–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431–40.CrossRef Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431–40.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lindström B, Röding J, Sundelin G. Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(9):714.CrossRef Lindström B, Röding J, Sundelin G. Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(9):714.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Radford K, Walker M. Impact of stroke on return to work. Brain Impair. 2008;9(2):161–9.CrossRef Radford K, Walker M. Impact of stroke on return to work. Brain Impair. 2008;9(2):161–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):406–18.CrossRef Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):406–18.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arauz A. Return to work after stroke: the role of cognitive deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(3):240.CrossRef Arauz A. Return to work after stroke: the role of cognitive deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(3):240.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Patel A, Berdunov V, Quayyum Z, King D, Knapp M, Wittenberg R. Estimated societal costs of stroke in the UK based on a discrete event simulation. Age Ageing. 2019;49(2):270–6.CrossRef Patel A, Berdunov V, Quayyum Z, King D, Knapp M, Wittenberg R. Estimated societal costs of stroke in the UK based on a discrete event simulation. Age Ageing. 2019;49(2):270–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Building capacity for work: a UK framework for vocational rehabilitation. London: DWP; 200. Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Building capacity for work: a UK framework for vocational rehabilitation. London: DWP; 200.
27.
go back to reference Baldwin C, Brusco NK. The effect of vocational rehabilitation on return-to-work rates post stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(5):562–72.CrossRef Baldwin C, Brusco NK. The effect of vocational rehabilitation on return-to-work rates post stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(5):562–72.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Trexler LE, Trexler LC, Malec JF, Klyce D, Parrott D. Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community participation and vocational outcome following brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(6):440–6.CrossRef Trexler LE, Trexler LC, Malec JF, Klyce D, Parrott D. Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community participation and vocational outcome following brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(6):440–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ntsiea M, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, Olorunju SS. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(7):663–73.CrossRef Ntsiea M, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, Olorunju SS. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(7):663–73.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195–212.CrossRef Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195–212.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Radford K, Grant M, Sinclair E, Kettlewell J, Watkin C. Describing return to work after stroke: a feasibility trial of 12-month outcomes. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(4):jrm00048.PubMed Radford K, Grant M, Sinclair E, Kettlewell J, Watkin C. Describing return to work after stroke: a feasibility trial of 12-month outcomes. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(4):jrm00048.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Grant M. Developing, delivering and evaluating stroke specific vocational rehabilitation: a feasibility randomised controlled trial [PhD thesis on the Internet]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham Repository; 2016. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35108/. Accessed 27 May 2020. Grant M. Developing, delivering and evaluating stroke specific vocational rehabilitation: a feasibility randomised controlled trial [PhD thesis on the Internet]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham Repository; 2016. http://​eprints.​nottingham.​ac.​uk/​35108/​. Accessed 27 May 2020.
34.
go back to reference Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346(jan08 15):e758. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346(jan08 15):e758.
37.
go back to reference Dawson L, Zarin DA, Emanuel EJ, Friedman LM, Chaudhari B, Goodman SN. Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000111.CrossRef Dawson L, Zarin DA, Emanuel EJ, Friedman LM, Chaudhari B, Goodman SN. Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000111.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Phillips J, Gaffney K, Phillips M, Radford K. Return to work after stroke – feasibility of 6-year follow-up. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(1):27–37.CrossRef Phillips J, Gaffney K, Phillips M, Radford K. Return to work after stroke – feasibility of 6-year follow-up. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(1):27–37.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hankey GJ. Training caregivers of disabled patients after stroke. Lancet. 2013;382(9910):2043–4.CrossRef Hankey GJ. Training caregivers of disabled patients after stroke. Lancet. 2013;382(9910):2043–4.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Anne F, Kirste M, Amanda F, Bipin B, Allan H, Jenny H, et al. Development and evaluation of tools and an intervention to improve patient- and carer-centred outcomes in Longer-Term Stroke care and exploration of adjustment post stroke: the LoTS care research programme. Program Grants Appl Res. 2014;2(6). Anne F, Kirste M, Amanda F, Bipin B, Allan H, Jenny H, et al. Development and evaluation of tools and an intervention to improve patient- and carer-centred outcomes in Longer-Term Stroke care and exploration of adjustment post stroke: the LoTS care research programme. Program Grants Appl Res. 2014;2(6).
41.
go back to reference Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.CrossRef Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):386–93.CrossRef Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):386–93.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Nouri F, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1(4):301–5.CrossRef Nouri F, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1(4):301–5.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1993;22(6):419.CrossRef Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1993;22(6):419.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Wilier JB, Ottenbacher LK, Coad LM. The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73(2):103–11.CrossRef Wilier JB, Ottenbacher LK, Coad LM. The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73(2):103–11.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Corrigan DJ, Deming DR. Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: replication and extension. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10(4):41–53.CrossRef Corrigan DJ, Deming DR. Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: replication and extension. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10(4):41–53.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five- level version of EQ- 5D ( EQ- 5D- 5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.CrossRef Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five- level version of EQ- 5D ( EQ- 5D- 5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, Karlińska A, Kobayashi A, Janssen M, et al. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):845–50.CrossRef Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, Karlińska A, Kobayashi A, Janssen M, et al. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):845–50.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Ilmarinen, J. and Tuomi, K.; Work ability index for ageing workers. Aging and Work Proceeding. Helsink: Institute of Occupational Health. 1993;(4):142–55. Ilmarinen, J. and Tuomi, K.; Work ability index for ageing workers. Aging and Work Proceeding. Helsink: Institute of Occupational Health. 1993;(4):142–55.
51.
go back to reference Horne J, Lincoln N, Logan P. Measurement of confidence: the development and psychometric evaluation of a stroke specific, measure of confidence. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1529–37.CrossRef Horne J, Lincoln N, Logan P. Measurement of confidence: the development and psychometric evaluation of a stroke specific, measure of confidence. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1529–37.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Chen P, Lin K-C, Liing R-J, Wu C-Y, Chen C-L, Chang K-C. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(6):1585–96.CrossRef Chen P, Lin K-C, Liing R-J, Wu C-Y, Chen C-L, Chang K-C. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(6):1585–96.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14(5):487–96.CrossRef Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14(5):487–96.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Willan AR, Briggs AH, Hoch JS. Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data. Health Econ. 2004;13(5):461–75.CrossRef Willan AR, Briggs AH, Hoch JS. Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data. Health Econ. 2004;13(5):461–75.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997;6(4):327–40.CrossRef Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997;6(4):327–40.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 2001;10(8):779–87.CrossRef Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 2001;10(8):779–87.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Faria R, Gomes M, Epstein D, White I. A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(12):1157–70.CrossRef Faria R, Gomes M, Epstein D, White I. A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(12):1157–70.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R, Bode R. Critical factors related to return to work after stroke: a qualitative study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):341–51.CrossRef Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R, Bode R. Critical factors related to return to work after stroke: a qualitative study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):341–51.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Developing stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):409–17.CrossRef Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Developing stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):409–17.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Radford K, Phillips J, Drummond A, Sach T, Walker M, Tyerman A, et al. Employment rates and health costs one year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). A cohort comparison. Brain Inj. 2012;26(4-5):600–1. Radford K, Phillips J, Drummond A, Sach T, Walker M, Tyerman A, et al. Employment rates and health costs one year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). A cohort comparison. Brain Inj. 2012;26(4-5):600–1.
69.
go back to reference Waddell G, Aylward M. Models of sickness and disability: applied to common health problems. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2009. Waddell G, Aylward M. Models of sickness and disability: applied to common health problems. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2009.
70.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–92.CrossRef Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–92.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Royal College of Occupational Therapists (RCOT). Good work for good health: the difference occupational therapy makes: RCOT; 2020. Royal College of Occupational Therapists (RCOT). Good work for good health: the difference occupational therapy makes: RCOT; 2020.
72.
go back to reference Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, De Simoni A. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e009974.CrossRef Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, De Simoni A. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e009974.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial
Authors
Kathryn A. Radford
Kristelle Craven
Vicki McLellan
Tracey H. Sach
Richard Brindle
Ivana Holloway
Suzanne Hartley
Audrey Bowen
Rory O’Connor
Judith Stevens
Julie Philips
Marion Walker
Jain Holmes
Christopher McKevitt
John Murray
Caroline Watkins
Katie Powers
Angela Shone
Amanda Farrin
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Stroke
Care
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04883-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue