Top

Journal of Neurology

Published in:

01-09-2021 | Stroke | Review

A review of mobile stroke units

Author: Jennifer Harris

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 9/2021

Abstract

Purpose of review

Mobile stroke units (MSUs) for prehospital treatment and management of patients with acute stroke have been developed more than a decade ago and is currently spreading worldwide. This review discusses the history of MSU and current operations and research.

Recent findings

Multiple studies have shown that MSU can significantly reduce treatment time with a tenfold increase of patients treated within the first 60 min of symptom onset. Recent preliminary results from the Berlin Prehospital or Usual Delivery of Acute Stroke Care trial (B-PROUD) showed a positive shift in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months for patients treated in MSUs. Two German studies indicate that the MSU model is cost effective by reducing disability and improving adjusted quality-life years after stroke.

Summary

The MSU model for prehospital management of acute stroke is spreading worldwide. More research is needed, however, to establish cost-effectiveness, efficacy and best setting for prehospital stroke management.

Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, Brott TG, Toni D, Grotta JC et al (2010) Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 375(9727):1695–1703CrossRef

Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW et al (2016) Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 316(12):1279–1288CrossRef

Kim J-T, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Navalkele DD, Grotta JC et al (2017) Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator in the golden hour and the shape of the 4.5-hour time-benefit curve in the National United States get with the guidelines-stroke population. Circulation 135(2):128–139CrossRef

Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, SITS-MOST investigators et al (2007) Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 369(9558):275–282CrossRef

Agyeman O, Nedeltchev K, Arnold M, Fischer U, Remonda L, Isenegger J et al (2006) Time to admission in acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 37(4):963–966CrossRef

Evenson KR, Foraker RE, Morris DL, Rosamond WD (2009) A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care. Int J Stroke 4(3):187–199CrossRef

Fassbender K, Walter S, Liu Y, Muehlhauser F, Ragoschke A, Kuehl S et al (2003) Mobile stroke unit for hyperacute stroke treatment. The first mobile stroke treatment unit design, concept, and proposal. Stroke 34(6):e44CrossRef

Balucani C, Levine SR (2012) The “almost magical” mobile stroke unit revolution. Neurology 78(23):1809–1810CrossRef

Yong E (2014) First response: race against time. Nature 510(7506):S5CrossRef

10.

Walter S, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Lesmeister M, Helwig SA, Kettner M, Grunwald IQ et al (2018) Mobile stroke unit use for prehospital stroke treatment: an update. Radiologe 58(1):24–28CrossRef

11.

Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A, Keller I, Lesmeister M, Schlechtriemen T et al (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 11(5):397–404CrossRef

12.

Ebinger M, Kunz A, Wendt M, Rozanski M, Winter B, Waldschmidt C et al (2015) Effects of golden hour thrombolysis: a Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Care in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) substudy. JAMA Neurol 72(1):25–30CrossRef

13.

Bowry R, Parker S, Rajan SS, Yamal JM, Wu TC, Richardson L et al (2015) Benefits of stroke treatment using a mobile stroke unit compared with standard management: the BEST-MSU study run-in phase. Stroke 46(12):3370–3374CrossRef

14.

Cerejo R, John S, Buletko AB, Taqui A, Itrat A, Organek N et al (2015) A mobile stroke treatment unit for field triage of patients for intraarterial revascularization therapy. J Neuroimag 25(6):940–945CrossRef

15.

Audebert H, Fassbender K, Hussain MS, Ebinger M, Turc G, Uchino K, PRESTO Group et al (2017) The PRE-hospital stroke treatment organization. Int J Stroke 12(9):932–940CrossRef

16.

Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen KR, Bollweg K, Kronborg C, Ebinger M, Audebert HJ (2015) Cost-effectiveness estimate of prehospital thrombolysis: results of the PHANTOM-S study. Neurology 84(11):1090–1097CrossRef

17.

Bukata R (2017) Are mobile CT stroke units worth the price tag? Emerg Physicians Mon 1:15–18

18.

Dietrich M, Walter S, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Helwig S, Levine S, Balucani C et al (2014) Is prehospital treatment of acute stroke too expensive? An economic evaluation based on the first trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 38(6):457–463CrossRef

19.

Neumann PJ, Cohen JT (2018) QALYs in 2018—Advantages and concerns. JAMA 319(24):2473–2474CrossRef

20.

Benefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit (BEST-MSU) (2014) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02190500). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02190500

21.

Parker SA, Bowry R, Wu TC, Noser EA, Jackson K, Richardson L et al (2015) Establishing the first mobile stroke unit in the United States. Stroke 46(5):1384–1391CrossRef

22.

Schwindling L, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Kettner M, Helwig S, Manitz M, Roumia S et al (2016) Prehospital Imaging-based triage of head trauma with a mobile stroke unit: first evidence and literature review. J Neuroimaging 26(5):489–493CrossRef

23.

Garber AM (2004) Cost-effectiveness and evidence evaluation as criteria for coverage policy. Health Aff (Millwood), Suppl Web Exclusives: W4-284-96.

24.

Kunz A, Ebinger M, Geisler F, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE et al (2016) Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study. Lancet Neurol 15(10):1035–1043CrossRef

25.

Nour M, Gornbein, J, Kunz A, Nolte C, Scheitz J, Ebinger M, et al (2019) Magnitude of benefit of prehospital mobile stroke unit vs conventional ED thrombolysis: final estimate based on PHANTOM-S observational registry study. Presented at International Stroke Conference, 2019; Honolulu, HI

26.

Audebert HJ (2020) The effects of mobile stroke units on functional outcome after acute cerebral ischemia. Presented at ISC 2020. February 20, 2020. Los Angeles, CA

27.

Tsivgoulis G, Geisler F, Katsanos AH, Korv J, Kunz A, Mikulik R et al (2018) Ultra-early intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in mobile stroke unit and hospital settings. Stroke 49(8):1996–1999CrossRef

28.

Wendt M, Ebinger M, Kunz A, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE et al (2015) Improved prehospital triage of patients with stroke in a specialized stroke ambulance: results of the pre-hospital acute neurological therapy and optimization of medical care in stroke study. Stroke 46:740–745CrossRef

29.

Prabhakaran S, Ward E, John S, Lopes DK, Chen M et al (2011) Transfer delay is a major factor limiting the use of intra-arterial treatment in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 42(6):1626–1630CrossRef

30.

Czap AL, Singh N, Bowry R, Jagolino-Cole A, Parker SA, Phan K et al (2020) Mobile stroke unit computed tomography angiography substantially shortens door-to-puncture time. Stroke 51(5):1613–1615CrossRef

31.

Cox AM, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD (2006) Socioeconomic status and stroke. Lancet Neurol 5:181–188CrossRef

32.

Teuschl Y, Brainin M (2010) Stroke education: discrepancies among factors influencing prehospital delay and stroke knowledge. Int J Stroke 5:187–208CrossRef

33.

Cadilhac DA, Purvis T, Kilkenny MF, Longworth M, Mohr K, Pollack M et al (2013) Evaluation of rural stroke services: does implementation of coordinators and pathways improve care in rural hospitals? Stroke 44:2848–2853CrossRef

34.

Newbury J, Kleinig T, Leyden J, Arima H, Castle S, Cranefield J et al (2017) Stroke epidemiology in an Australian rural cohort (SEARCH). Int J Stroke 12:161–168CrossRef

35.

Koifman J, Hall R, Li S, Stamplecoski M, Fang J, Saltman AP et al (2016) The association between rural residence and stroke care and outcomes. J Neurol Sci 15(363):16–20CrossRef

36.

Shuaib A, Jeerakathil T (2018) Alberta mobile stroke unit I. The mobile stroke unit and management of acute stroke in rural settings. CMAJ 190:E855–858CrossRef

37.

Walter S, Zhao H, Easton D, Bil C, Sauer J, Liu Y et al (2018) Air-mobile stroke unit for access to stroke treatment in rural regions. Int J Stroke 13:568–575CrossRef

38.

Kummer B, Lerario M, Hunter M, Efraim E, Wu X, Omran S, et al. (2019) Geographic analysis of mobile stroke unit treatment in a densely populated urban area: The New York city METRONOME registry. Presented at International Stroke Conference, 2019; Honolulu, HI

39.

Lahr MM, van der Zee DJ, Vroomen PC, Luijckx GJ, Buskens E (2013) Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a simulation study to improve pre- and in-hospital delays in community hospitals. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79049CrossRef

Title: A review of mobile stroke units
Author: Jennifer Harris
Publication date: 01-09-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Stroke
Care
Stroke Unit
Published in: Journal of Neurology / Issue 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09910-4

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

A review of mobile stroke units

Abstract

Purpose of review

Recent findings

Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose of review

Recent findings

Summary

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2021

Limbic hypoconnectivity in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder with impulse control disorders

The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale reveals early neuropsychological deficits in SCA3 patients

Neurofilaments in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in Guillain–Barré syndrome: value of albumin quotients

Biallelic RFC1-expansion in a French multicentric sporadic ataxia cohort

Late-onset MS is associated with an increased rate of reaching disability milestones