Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Stroke | Research

Developing DELPHI expert consensus rules for a digital twin model of acute stroke care in the neuro critical care unit

Authors: Johnny Dang, Amos Lal, Amy Montgomery, Laure Flurin, John Litell, Ognjen Gajic, Alejandro Rabinstein, on behalf of The Digital Twin Platform for education, research, and healthcare delivery investigator group

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Digital twins, a form of artificial intelligence, are virtual representations of the physical world. In the past 20 years, digital twins have been utilized to track wind turbines' operations, monitor spacecraft's status, and even create a model of the Earth for climate research. While digital twins hold much promise for the neurocritical care unit, the question remains on how to best establish the rules that govern these models. This model will expand on our group’s existing digital twin model for the treatment of sepsis.

Methods

The authors of this project collaborated to create a Direct Acyclic Graph (DAG) and an initial series of 20 DELPHI statements, each with six accompanying sub-statements that captured the pathophysiology surrounding the management of acute ischemic strokes in the practice of Neurocritical Care (NCC). Agreement from a panel of 18 experts in the field of NCC was collected through a 7-point Likert scale with consensus defined a-priori by ≥ 80% selection of a 6 (“agree”) or 7 (“strongly agree”). The endpoint of the study was defined as the completion of three separate rounds of DELPHI consensus. DELPHI statements that had met consensus would not be included in subsequent rounds of DELPHI consensus. The authors refined DELPHI statements that did not reach consensus with the guidance of de-identified expert comments for subsequent rounds of DELPHI. All DELPHI statements that reached consensus by the end of three rounds of DELPHI consensus would go on to be used to inform the construction of the digital twin model.

Results

After the completion of three rounds of DELPHI, 93 (77.5%) statements reached consensus, 11 (9.2%) statements were excluded, and 16 (13.3%) statements did not reach a consensus of the original 120 DELPHI statements.

Conclusion

This descriptive study demonstrates the use of the DELPHI process to generate consensus among experts and establish a set of rules for the development of a digital twin model for use in the neurologic ICU. Compared to associative models of AI, which develop rules based on finding associations in datasets, digital twin AI created by the DELPHI process are easily interpretable models based on a current understanding of underlying physiology.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mintz Y, Brodie R. Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28(2):73–81.CrossRefPubMed Mintz Y, Brodie R. Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28(2):73–81.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y, et al. The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(48):4556–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y, et al. The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(48):4556–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Voigt I, Inojosa H, Dillenseger A, Haase R, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2021;3(12): 669811.CrossRef Voigt I, Inojosa H, Dillenseger A, Haase R, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2021;3(12): 669811.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Voosen P. Europe builds ‘digital twin’ of Earth to hone climate forecasts. Science. 2020;370(6512):16–7.CrossRefPubMed Voosen P. Europe builds ‘digital twin’ of Earth to hone climate forecasts. Science. 2020;370(6512):16–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Eddy DM, Schlessinger L. Validation of the Archimedes Diabetes Model. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3102–10.CrossRefPubMed Eddy DM, Schlessinger L. Validation of the Archimedes Diabetes Model. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3102–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Stern M, Williams K, Eddy D, Kahn R. Validation of Prediction of Diabetes by the Archimedes Model and Comparison With Other Predicting Models. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1670–1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stern M, Williams K, Eddy D, Kahn R. Validation of Prediction of Diabetes by the Archimedes Model and Comparison With Other Predicting Models. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1670–1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Lal A, Herasevich V, Gajic O. Utility of AI models in critical care: union of man and the machine. Crit Care. 2021;2(25):46.CrossRef Lal A, Herasevich V, Gajic O. Utility of AI models in critical care: union of man and the machine. Crit Care. 2021;2(25):46.CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Chaudhry F, Hunt RJ, Hariharan P, Anand SK, Sanjay S, Kjoller EE, et al. Machine Learning Applications in the Neuro ICU: A Solution to Big Data Mayhem? Front Neurol. 2020;9(11): 554633.CrossRef Chaudhry F, Hunt RJ, Hariharan P, Anand SK, Sanjay S, Kjoller EE, et al. Machine Learning Applications in the Neuro ICU: A Solution to Big Data Mayhem? Front Neurol. 2020;9(11): 554633.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mansour A, Fuhrman JD, Ammar FE, Loggini A, Davis J, Lazaridis C, et al. Machine Learning for Early Detection of Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36(3):974–82.CrossRefPubMed Mansour A, Fuhrman JD, Ammar FE, Loggini A, Davis J, Lazaridis C, et al. Machine Learning for Early Detection of Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36(3):974–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kamousi B, Karunakaran S, Gururangan K, Markert M, Decker B, Khankhanian P, et al. Monitoring the Burden of Seizures and Highly Epileptiform Patterns in Critical Care with a Novel Machine Learning Method. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(3):908–17.CrossRefPubMed Kamousi B, Karunakaran S, Gururangan K, Markert M, Decker B, Khankhanian P, et al. Monitoring the Burden of Seizures and Highly Epileptiform Patterns in Critical Care with a Novel Machine Learning Method. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(3):908–17.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hall AN, Weaver B, Liotta E, Maas MB, Faigle R, Mroczek DK, et al. Identifying Modifiable Predictors of Patient Outcomes After Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Machine Learning. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):73–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hall AN, Weaver B, Liotta E, Maas MB, Faigle R, Mroczek DK, et al. Identifying Modifiable Predictors of Patient Outcomes After Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Machine Learning. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):73–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Al-Mufti F, Kim M, Dodson V, Sursal T, Bowers C, Cole C, et al. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Neurocritical Care: a Specialty-Wide Disruptive Transformation or a Strategy for Success. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19(11):89.CrossRefPubMed Al-Mufti F, Kim M, Dodson V, Sursal T, Bowers C, Cole C, et al. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Neurocritical Care: a Specialty-Wide Disruptive Transformation or a Strategy for Success. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19(11):89.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Trevena W, Lal A, Zec S, Cubro E, Zhong X, Dong Y, et al. Modeling of Critically Ill Patient Pathways to Support Intensive Care Delivery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2022;7(3):7287–94.CrossRef Trevena W, Lal A, Zec S, Cubro E, Zhong X, Dong Y, et al. Modeling of Critically Ill Patient Pathways to Support Intensive Care Delivery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2022;7(3):7287–94.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Niederberger M, Köberich S, members of the DeWiss Network. Coming to consensus: the Delphi technique. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;20(7):692–5.CrossRefPubMed Niederberger M, Köberich S, members of the DeWiss Network. Coming to consensus: the Delphi technique. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;20(7):692–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nasa P, Azoulay E, Khanna AK, Jain R, Gupta S, Javeri Y, et al. Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nasa P, Azoulay E, Khanna AK, Jain R, Gupta S, Javeri Y, et al. Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–9.CrossRefPubMed Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, et al. The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review. Acad Med. 2017;92(10):1491–8.CrossRefPubMed Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, et al. The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review. Acad Med. 2017;92(10):1491–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lal A, Li G, Cubro E, Chalmers S, Li H, Herasevich V, et al. Development and Verification of a Digital Twin Patient Model to Predict Specific Treatment Response During the First 24 Hours of Sepsis. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(11): e0249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lal A, Li G, Cubro E, Chalmers S, Li H, Herasevich V, et al. Development and Verification of a Digital Twin Patient Model to Predict Specific Treatment Response During the First 24 Hours of Sepsis. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(11): e0249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Dang J, Lal A, Flurin L, James A, Gajic O, Rabinstein AA. Predictive modeling in neurocritical care using causal artificial intelligence. World J Crit Care Med. 2021;10(4):112–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dang J, Lal A, Flurin L, James A, Gajic O, Rabinstein AA. Predictive modeling in neurocritical care using causal artificial intelligence. World J Crit Care Med. 2021;10(4):112–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Gary PJ, Lal A, Simonetto D, Gajic O, Moraes AGD. Results of a modified delphi approach to expert consensus for a digital twin patient model in the icu: acute on chronic liver failure. Chest. 2022;162(4):A2702.CrossRef Gary PJ, Lal A, Simonetto D, Gajic O, Moraes AGD. Results of a modified delphi approach to expert consensus for a digital twin patient model in the icu: acute on chronic liver failure. Chest. 2022;162(4):A2702.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Montgomery AJ, Litell JM, Gajic O, Lal A. Gaining consensus on expert rule statements for a digital twin patient model in the ICU using a delphi method. Chest. 2022;162(4):A746.CrossRef Montgomery AJ, Litell JM, Gajic O, Lal A. Gaining consensus on expert rule statements for a digital twin patient model in the ICU using a delphi method. Chest. 2022;162(4):A746.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lal A, Pinevich Y, Gajic O, Herasevich V, Pickering B. Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness. World J Crit Care Med. 2020;9(2):13–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lal A, Pinevich Y, Gajic O, Herasevich V, Pickering B. Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness. World J Crit Care Med. 2020;9(2):13–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Yeo M, Kok HK, Kutaiba N, Maingard J, Thijs V, Tahayori B, et al. Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and outcome prediction – applications in stroke. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;65(5):518–28.CrossRef Yeo M, Kok HK, Kutaiba N, Maingard J, Thijs V, Tahayori B, et al. Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and outcome prediction – applications in stroke. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;65(5):518–28.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Boubker J. When Medical Devices Have a Mind of Their Own: The Challenges of Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Am J Law Med. 2021;47(4):427–54.CrossRefPubMed Boubker J. When Medical Devices Have a Mind of Their Own: The Challenges of Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Am J Law Med. 2021;47(4):427–54.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Al-Mufti F, Dodson V, Lee J, Wajswol E, Gandhi C, Scurlock C, et al. Artificial intelligence in neurocritical care. J Neurol Sci. 2019;404:1–4.CrossRefPubMed Al-Mufti F, Dodson V, Lee J, Wajswol E, Gandhi C, Scurlock C, et al. Artificial intelligence in neurocritical care. J Neurol Sci. 2019;404:1–4.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Popa EO, van Hilten M, Oosterkamp E, Bogaardt MJ. The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021;17(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Popa EO, van Hilten M, Oosterkamp E, Bogaardt MJ. The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021;17(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Bruynseels K, Santoni de Sio F, van den Hoven J. Digital Twins in Health Care: Ethical Implications of an Emerging Engineering Paradigm. Front Genet. 2018;9:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bruynseels K, Santoni de Sio F, van den Hoven J. Digital Twins in Health Care: Ethical Implications of an Emerging Engineering Paradigm. Front Genet. 2018;9:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Developing DELPHI expert consensus rules for a digital twin model of acute stroke care in the neuro critical care unit
Authors
Johnny Dang
Amos Lal
Amy Montgomery
Laure Flurin
John Litell
Ognjen Gajic
Alejandro Rabinstein
on behalf of The Digital Twin Platform for education, research, and healthcare delivery investigator group
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03192-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Neurology 1/2023 Go to the issue