Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Original Article

Stress distribution in mandibular donor site after harvesting bone grafts of various sizes from the ascending ramus of a dentate mandible by finite element analysis

Authors: Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich, Kristian Kniha, József Szalma, Nassim Ayoub, Frank Hölzle, Michael Wolf, Ali Modabber, Stefan Raith

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Harvesting bone from the ascending ramus of the mandible is a common procedure. However, mandibular fracture may occur after grafting bone blocks. This study aimed to investigate the resulting force distribution of stress and strain in the mandibular donor site after harvesting bone grafts of different sizes and various loadings.

Methods

Finite element analysis was performed for virtual harvesting of bone blocks of nine different sizes between 15 × 20 and 25 × 30 mm and three different chewing loads (incisal, ipsilateral and contralateral). von Mises stress and first principal stress distributions were measured.

Results

von Mises stress was distributed between 35.01 (10 × 15 mm graft, incisal load) and 333.25 MPa (30 × 20 mm graft ipsilateral load), whereas first principal stress distributions were between 48.27 (10 × 15 mm graft, incisal load) and 414.69 MPa (30 × 20 mm graft ipsilateral load). In general, the least stress was observed with incisal load followed by ipsilateral load and finally contralateral load. The critical value of 133 MPa was found after removing almost all grafts with a width of 20 or 30 mm.

Conclusions

Incisal loading led to less stress compared with contralateral and ipsilateral loads. Increasing graft size led to increasing weakness of the donor site. Graft width exerted a greater influence on stress development than its height.

Clinical relevance

Ipsilateral chewing and increasing width of the bone graft result in maximum stress in the mandibular donor side, and critical values regarding to the possibility of fractures are already to expect from a graft size of 20 × 15 mm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Simion M, Fontana F (2004) Autogenous and xenogeneic bone grafts for the bone regeneration. A literature review. Minerva Stomatol 53:191–206PubMed Simion M, Fontana F (2004) Autogenous and xenogeneic bone grafts for the bone regeneration. A literature review. Minerva Stomatol 53:191–206PubMed
2.
go back to reference Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR, Ismail YH (1992) Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:360–366 Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR, Ismail YH (1992) Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:360–366
3.
go back to reference Khoury F, Buchmann R (2001) Surgical therapy of peri-implant disease: a 3-year follow-up study of cases treated with 3 different techniques of bone regeneration. J Periodontol 72:1498–1508CrossRefPubMed Khoury F, Buchmann R (2001) Surgical therapy of peri-implant disease: a 3-year follow-up study of cases treated with 3 different techniques of bone regeneration. J Periodontol 72:1498–1508CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Misch CM (1997) Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:767–776PubMed Misch CM (1997) Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:767–776PubMed
5.
go back to reference Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S (1991) Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxilla: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1277–1287CrossRefPubMed Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S (1991) Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxilla: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1277–1287CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Khoury F (1999) Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:557–564PubMed Khoury F (1999) Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:557–564PubMed
7.
go back to reference Misch CM (2000) Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. J Oral Implantol 26:42–49CrossRefPubMed Misch CM (2000) Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. J Oral Implantol 26:42–49CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A (1985) Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59:120–129CrossRefPubMed Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A (1985) Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59:120–129CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ahlers E, Setabutr D, Garritano F, Adil E, McGinn J (2013) Pathologic fracture of the mandible secondary to traumatic bone cyst. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 6:201–204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahlers E, Setabutr D, Garritano F, Adil E, McGinn J (2013) Pathologic fracture of the mandible secondary to traumatic bone cyst. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 6:201–204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Chrcanovic BR, Custodio AL (2010) Considerations of mandibular angle fractures during and after surgery for removal of third molars: a review of the literature. Oral Maxillofac Surg 14:71–80CrossRefPubMed Chrcanovic BR, Custodio AL (2010) Considerations of mandibular angle fractures during and after surgery for removal of third molars: a review of the literature. Oral Maxillofac Surg 14:71–80CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kwon IJ, Lee BH, Eo MY, Kim SM, Lee JH, Lee SK (2016) Pathologic mandibular fracture after biting crab shells following ramal bone graft. Dent Traumatol 32:421–424CrossRefPubMed Kwon IJ, Lee BH, Eo MY, Kim SM, Lee JH, Lee SK (2016) Pathologic mandibular fracture after biting crab shells following ramal bone graft. Dent Traumatol 32:421–424CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Murakami K, Yamamoto K, Tsuyuki M, Sugiura T, Tsutsumi S, Kirita T (2014) Theoretical efficacy of preventive measures for pathologic fracture after surgical removal of mandibular lesions based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:833.e1–833.18CrossRef Murakami K, Yamamoto K, Tsuyuki M, Sugiura T, Tsutsumi S, Kirita T (2014) Theoretical efficacy of preventive measures for pathologic fracture after surgical removal of mandibular lesions based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:833.e1–833.18CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ertem SY, Uckan S, Ozden UA (2013) The comparison of angular and curvilinear marginal mandibulectomy on force distribution with three dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:e54–e58CrossRefPubMed Ertem SY, Uckan S, Ozden UA (2013) The comparison of angular and curvilinear marginal mandibulectomy on force distribution with three dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:e54–e58CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Antic S, Vukicevic AM, Milasinovic M, Saveljic I, Jovicic G, Filipovic N, Rakocevic Z, Djuric M (2015) Impact of the lower third molar presence and position on the fragility of mandibular angle and condyle: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:870–878CrossRefPubMed Antic S, Vukicevic AM, Milasinovic M, Saveljic I, Jovicic G, Filipovic N, Rakocevic Z, Djuric M (2015) Impact of the lower third molar presence and position on the fragility of mandibular angle and condyle: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:870–878CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kan B, Coskunses FM, Mutlu I, Ugur L, Meral DG (2015) Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:908–913CrossRefPubMed Kan B, Coskunses FM, Mutlu I, Ugur L, Meral DG (2015) Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:908–913CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vieira EOTR, Kemmoku DT, da Silva JVL, Noritomi PY, Passeri LA (2017) Finite element evaluation of stable fixation in combined mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75:2399–2410CrossRef Vieira EOTR, Kemmoku DT, da Silva JVL, Noritomi PY, Passeri LA (2017) Finite element evaluation of stable fixation in combined mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75:2399–2410CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Möhlhenrich SC, Heussen N, Ayoub N, Hölzle F, Modabber A (2015) Three-dimensional evaluation of the different donor sites of the mandible for autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Investig 19:453–458CrossRefPubMed Möhlhenrich SC, Heussen N, Ayoub N, Hölzle F, Modabber A (2015) Three-dimensional evaluation of the different donor sites of the mandible for autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Investig 19:453–458CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H (2002) Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:357–368 Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H (2002) Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:357–368
19.
go back to reference Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KB, Liu GR (2014) Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 31:233–239CrossRef Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KB, Liu GR (2014) Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 31:233–239CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S (2004) Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91:20–25CrossRefPubMed Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S (2004) Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91:20–25CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T (2006) Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129(721):e727–e712 Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T (2006) Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129(721):e727–e712
22.
go back to reference Erkmen E, Simsek B, Yucel E, Kurt A (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:97–104CrossRefPubMed Erkmen E, Simsek B, Yucel E, Kurt A (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:97–104CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Korioth TW, Hannam AG (1994) Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res 73:56–66CrossRefPubMed Korioth TW, Hannam AG (1994) Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res 73:56–66CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Scheerlinck LM, Muradin MS, van der Bilt A, Meijer GJ, Koole R, Van Cann EM (2013) Donor site complications in bone grafting: comparison of iliac crest, calvarial, and mandibular ramus bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:222–227CrossRefPubMed Scheerlinck LM, Muradin MS, van der Bilt A, Meijer GJ, Koole R, Van Cann EM (2013) Donor site complications in bone grafting: comparison of iliac crest, calvarial, and mandibular ramus bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:222–227CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC (2003) Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:252–277CrossRefPubMed Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC (2003) Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:252–277CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Rues S, Lenz J, Turp JC, Schweizerhof K, Schindler HJ (2008) Forces and motor control mechanisms during biting in a realistically balanced experimental occlusion. Arch Oral Biol 53:1119–1128CrossRefPubMed Rues S, Lenz J, Turp JC, Schweizerhof K, Schindler HJ (2008) Forces and motor control mechanisms during biting in a realistically balanced experimental occlusion. Arch Oral Biol 53:1119–1128CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393–405CrossRefPubMed Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393–405CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Frost HM (2003) Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 275:1081–1101CrossRefPubMed Frost HM (2003) Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 275:1081–1101CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Ralph JP (1977) Stress trajectories within the mandible under occlusal loads. J Dent Res 56:1297–1302CrossRefPubMed Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Ralph JP (1977) Stress trajectories within the mandible under occlusal loads. J Dent Res 56:1297–1302CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Iizuka T, Tanner S, Berthold H (1997) Mandibular fractures following third molar extraction. A retrospective clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:338–343CrossRefPubMed Iizuka T, Tanner S, Berthold H (1997) Mandibular fractures following third molar extraction. A retrospective clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:338–343CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Streckbein P, Kahling C, Wilbrand JF, Malik CY, Schaaf H, Howaldt HP, Streckbein R (2014) Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using autologous press fit bone cylinders and micro-lag-screw fixation: technical note and initial experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:387–391CrossRefPubMed Streckbein P, Kahling C, Wilbrand JF, Malik CY, Schaaf H, Howaldt HP, Streckbein R (2014) Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using autologous press fit bone cylinders and micro-lag-screw fixation: technical note and initial experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:387–391CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Stress distribution in mandibular donor site after harvesting bone grafts of various sizes from the ascending ramus of a dentate mandible by finite element analysis
Authors
Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
Kristian Kniha
József Szalma
Nassim Ayoub
Frank Hölzle
Michael Wolf
Ali Modabber
Stefan Raith
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2671-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2019 Go to the issue