Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 6/2016

01-11-2016 | Original Paper

Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement

Authors: Igor Sorokin, Diana K. Cardona-Grau, Alexandra Rehfuss, Alan Birney, Costas Stavrakis, Gabriel Leinwand, Allen Herr, Paul J. Feustel, Mark D. White

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is highly successful at eliminating renal stones of various sizes and compositions. As urologists are taking on more complex procedures using RIRS, this has led to an increase in operative (OR) times. Our objective was to determine the best predictor of OR time in patients undergoing RIRS. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients undergoing unilateral RIRS for solitary stones over a 10 year time span. Stones were fragmented and actively extracted using a basket. Variables potentially affecting OR time such as patient age, sex, BMI, lower pole stone location, volume, Hounsfield units (HU), composition, ureteral access sheath (UAS) use, and pre-operative stenting were collected. Multivariable linear and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the predictors of OR time. There were 118 patients that met inclusion criteria. The median stone volume was 282.6 mm3 (IQR 150.7–644.7) and the mean OR time was 50 min (±25.9 SD). On univariate linear regression, stone volume had a moderate correlation with OR time (y = 0.022x + 38.2, r 2 = 0.363, p < 0.01). On multivariable stepwise regression, stone volume had the strongest impact on OR time, increasing time by 2.0 min for each 100 mm3 increase in stone volume (p < 0.001). UAS added 13.5 (SE 3.9, p = 0.001) minutes and renal lower pole location added 9 min (SE 4.3, p = 0.03) in each case they were used. Pre-operative stenting, HU, calcium oxalate stone composition, sex, and age had no significant effect on OR time. Amongst the main stone factors in RIRS, stone volume has the strongest impact on operative time. This can be used to predict the length of the procedure by roughly adding 2 min per 100 mm3 increase in stone volume.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178:2418CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178:2418CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT et al (2011) Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:2288CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT et al (2011) Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:2288CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Jenkins ED, Yom VH, Melman L et al (2010) Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 24:1872CrossRefPubMed Jenkins ED, Yom VH, Melman L et al (2010) Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 24:1872CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ito H, Kuroda S, Kawahara T et al (2015) Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis. Urolithiasis 43:467CrossRefPubMed Ito H, Kuroda S, Kawahara T et al (2015) Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis. Urolithiasis 43:467CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eisner BH, Kambadakone A, Monga M et al (2009) Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. J Urol 181:1710CrossRefPubMed Eisner BH, Kambadakone A, Monga M et al (2009) Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. J Urol 181:1710CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Patel SR, Stanton P, Zelinski N et al (2011) Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement. J Urol 186:2275CrossRefPubMed Patel SR, Stanton P, Zelinski N et al (2011) Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement. J Urol 186:2275CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Deters LA, Pais VM Jr (2013) Difference in operative time according to stone location for endoscopic management of ureteral and renal stones. Urology 81:522CrossRefPubMed Deters LA, Pais VM Jr (2013) Difference in operative time according to stone location for endoscopic management of ureteral and renal stones. Urology 81:522CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Grasso M, Ficazzola M (1999) Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. J Urol 162:1904CrossRefPubMed Grasso M, Ficazzola M (1999) Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. J Urol 162:1904CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jacquemet B, Martin L, Pastori J et al (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones compared with other renal locations. J Endourol 28:1183CrossRefPubMed Jacquemet B, Martin L, Pastori J et al (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones compared with other renal locations. J Endourol 28:1183CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kourambas J, Delvecchio FC, Munver R et al (2000) Nitinol stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole renal calculi. Urology 56:935CrossRefPubMed Kourambas J, Delvecchio FC, Munver R et al (2000) Nitinol stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole renal calculi. Urology 56:935CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr et al (2005) Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66:252CrossRefPubMed L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr et al (2005) Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66:252CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165:789CrossRefPubMed Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165:789CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wiener SV, Deters LA, Pais VM Jr (2012) Effect of stone composition on operative time during ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy with active fragment retrieval. Urology 80:790CrossRefPubMed Wiener SV, Deters LA, Pais VM Jr (2012) Effect of stone composition on operative time during ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy with active fragment retrieval. Urology 80:790CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125CrossRefPubMed Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD (2011) Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol 25:751CrossRefPubMed Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD (2011) Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol 25:751CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R et al (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768CrossRefPubMed Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R et al (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement
Authors
Igor Sorokin
Diana K. Cardona-Grau
Alexandra Rehfuss
Alan Birney
Costas Stavrakis
Gabriel Leinwand
Allen Herr
Paul J. Feustel
Mark D. White
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0875-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Urolithiasis 6/2016 Go to the issue