Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 5/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Paper

Stone scattering during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of renal anatomical characteristics

Authors: Alireza Aminsharifi, Ali Eslahi, Ali Reza Safarpour, Sasan Mehrabi

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the upper calyx–lower calyx infundibular (ULI) angle influences intrarenal stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a solitary renal pelvis stone and significant hydronephrosis. 50 adult patients with a solitary renal pelvis stone larger than 20 mm were considered for PCNL with a pneumatic lithotriptor for stone fragmentation. Inclusion criteria were moderate to severe hydronephrosis and upper calyx infundibular width >10 mm, and access point was the lower calyx in all cases. The ULI angle as well as stone fragment migration from the renal pelvis toward the upper calyx was noted during the operation. To determine the “critical” angle above which the probability of stone migration would be increased significantly, receiver operating characteristic curve was used. Mean stone size was 33.8 ± 13.2 mm. In 23 patients (46 %) the stone migrated toward the upper calyx during stone fragmentation. Mean ULI angle was significantly wider in patients whose stone migrated (120.2 ± 20.5 versus 102.2 ± 21.4, P = 0.004, 99 % CI = 6.04–29.9). A ULI angle of 117.5° was the critical angle, above which the rate of stone migration rose significantly (P < 0.008). One-session stone-free rate was significantly higher in patients without stone migration (P = 0.03). In patients with a solitary renal pelvis stone and significant hydronephrosis, a wider ULI angle was associated with a greater likelihood of stone scattering which could potentially affect the outcome of PCNL with pneumatic lithotriptor. A cut-off angle of 117.5° was the critical angle, above which access via a calyx other than the lower calyx (example: middle or upper calyx) seems advisable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, CROES PCNL Study Group et al (2011) The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25:11–17PubMedCrossRef de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, CROES PCNL Study Group et al (2011) The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25:11–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25:1263–1268PubMedCrossRef Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25:1263–1268PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M (2012) Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol 26:6–14PubMedCrossRef Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M (2012) Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol 26:6–14PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ganesamoni R, Sabnis RB, Mishra S, Parekh N, Ganpule A, Vyas JB et al (2013) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laser lithotripsy with pneumatic lithotripsy in miniperc for renal calculi. J Endourol 27:1444–1449PubMedCrossRef Ganesamoni R, Sabnis RB, Mishra S, Parekh N, Ganpule A, Vyas JB et al (2013) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laser lithotripsy with pneumatic lithotripsy in miniperc for renal calculi. J Endourol 27:1444–1449PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Binbay M, Akman T, Ozgor F, Yazici O, Sari E, Erbin A et al (2011) Does pelvicaliceal system anatomy affect success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol 78:733–737PubMedCrossRef Binbay M, Akman T, Ozgor F, Yazici O, Sari E, Erbin A et al (2011) Does pelvicaliceal system anatomy affect success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol 78:733–737PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wosnitzer M, Xavier K, Gupta M (2009) Novel use of a ureteroscopic stone entrapment device to prevent antegrade stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:203–207PubMedCrossRef Wosnitzer M, Xavier K, Gupta M (2009) Novel use of a ureteroscopic stone entrapment device to prevent antegrade stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:203–207PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aminsharifi A, Alavi M, Sadeghi G et al (2011) Renal parenchymal damage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy with one-stage tract dilation technique: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 25:927–931PubMedCrossRef Aminsharifi A, Alavi M, Sadeghi G et al (2011) Renal parenchymal damage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy with one-stage tract dilation technique: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 25:927–931PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Altunrende F, Tefekli A, Stein RJ et al (2011) Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: medium-term follow-up. J Endourol 25:941–945PubMedCrossRef Altunrende F, Tefekli A, Stein RJ et al (2011) Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: medium-term follow-up. J Endourol 25:941–945PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG (2009) Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments. J Endourol 23:1751–1755PubMedCrossRef Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG (2009) Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments. J Endourol 23:1751–1755PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smit M, Verhagen PC (2004) Preventing stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the stone cone. BJU Int 94:671–672PubMedCrossRef Smit M, Verhagen PC (2004) Preventing stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the stone cone. BJU Int 94:671–672PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tepeler A, Armağan A, Akman T, Polat EC, Ersöz C, Topaktaş R et al (2012) Impact of percutaneous renal access technique on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 26:828–833PubMedCrossRef Tepeler A, Armağan A, Akman T, Polat EC, Ersöz C, Topaktaş R et al (2012) Impact of percutaneous renal access technique on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 26:828–833PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Aminsharifi A, Haghpanah R, Haghpanah S (2014) Predictors of excessive renal displacement during access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urolithiasis 42:61–65PubMedCrossRef Aminsharifi A, Haghpanah R, Haghpanah S (2014) Predictors of excessive renal displacement during access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urolithiasis 42:61–65PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miller J, Durack JC, Sorensen MD, Wang JH, Stoller ML (2013) Renal calyceal anatomy characterization with 3-dimensional in vivo computerized tomography imaging. J Urol 189:562–567PubMedCrossRef Miller J, Durack JC, Sorensen MD, Wang JH, Stoller ML (2013) Renal calyceal anatomy characterization with 3-dimensional in vivo computerized tomography imaging. J Urol 189:562–567PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stone scattering during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of renal anatomical characteristics
Authors
Alireza Aminsharifi
Ali Eslahi
Ali Reza Safarpour
Sasan Mehrabi
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0678-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Urolithiasis 5/2014 Go to the issue