Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Article

Stiffness, Compliance, Resilience, and Creep Deformation: Understanding Implant-Soft Tissue Dynamics in the Augmented Breast: Fundamentals Based on Materials Science

Authors: Manuel R. Vegas, Jose L. Martin del Yerro

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postoperative tissue stretch deformities are among the possible complications in breast augmentation. These deformities are responsible for many potential risks such as bottoming-out deformity, breakdown of the inframammary fold, permanent tissue atrophy, sensory loss, and breast distortion (visible implant edges and traction rippling), among others. Although the elastic properties of the breast are a major concern for plastic surgeons, concepts such as stiffness, compliance, elasticity, and resilience have not been sufficiently defined or explored in the plastic surgery literature.

Methods

Similar to any other material, living tissues are subject to the fundamentals of the mechanics of materials. Based on their experience with more than 5,000 breast augmentations, the authors explored the basic fundamentals of the mechanics of materials in search of a rational explanation for long-term results in breast augmentation and augmentation-mastopexy.

Results

A basic law of the mechanics of materials determines that when a material (e.g., breast) is loaded with a force (e.g., implant), it produces a stress that causes the material to deform (e.g., breast augmentation), and this behavior might be graphed in a theoretical material’s stress–stress curve. This deformation will increase with time although the load (implant) remains constant, a concept termed “creep deformation.” Because the breast, like all human tissues, is a viscoelastic material, the application of concepts such as elastic and plastic deformation, stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation can and should be applied to breast augmentation surgery.

Conclusions

The authors have found that the principles of the mechanics of materials can provide plastic surgeons with some clues for a predictable, long-lasting good result in breast augmentation and augmentation-mastopexy. Future studies are needed to develop these concepts and evaluate how they might individually determine the mid- and long-term outcomes of augmented breasts.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abu-Hijleh MF, Roshier AL, Al-Shboul Q, Dharap AS, Harris PF (2006) The membranous layer of superficial fascia: Evidence for its widespread distribution in the body. Surg Radiol Anat 28:606–619PubMedCrossRef Abu-Hijleh MF, Roshier AL, Al-Shboul Q, Dharap AS, Harris PF (2006) The membranous layer of superficial fascia: Evidence for its widespread distribution in the body. Surg Radiol Anat 28:606–619PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Agache PG, Monneur C, Leveque JL, De Rigal J (1980) Mechanical properties and Young’s modulus of human skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol Res 269:221–232PubMedCrossRef Agache PG, Monneur C, Leveque JL, De Rigal J (1980) Mechanical properties and Young’s modulus of human skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol Res 269:221–232PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Avelar J (1989) Regional distribution and behavior of the subcutaneous tissue concerning selection and indication for liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13:155–165PubMedCrossRef Avelar J (1989) Regional distribution and behavior of the subcutaneous tissue concerning selection and indication for liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13:155–165PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bischoff JE, Arruda EM, Grosh K (2000) Finite element modeling of human skin using an isotropic, nonlinear elastic constitutive model. J Biomech 33:645–652PubMedCrossRef Bischoff JE, Arruda EM, Grosh K (2000) Finite element modeling of human skin using an isotropic, nonlinear elastic constitutive model. J Biomech 33:645–652PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boutros S, Kattash M, Wienfeld A, Yuksel E, Baer S, Shenaq S (1998) The intradermal anatomy of the inframammary fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1030–1033PubMed Boutros S, Kattash M, Wienfeld A, Yuksel E, Baer S, Shenaq S (1998) The intradermal anatomy of the inframammary fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1030–1033PubMed
6.
go back to reference Choudry U, Kim N (2012) Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1352–1359PubMedCrossRef Choudry U, Kim N (2012) Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1352–1359PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Codner MA, Cohen AT, Hester TR (2001) Complications in breast augmentation: Prevention and correction. Clin Plast Surg 28(96):587–595 discussion 96PubMed Codner MA, Cohen AT, Hester TR (2001) Complications in breast augmentation: Prevention and correction. Clin Plast Surg 28(96):587–595 discussion 96PubMed
8.
go back to reference De Filippo RE, Atala A (2002) Stretch and growth: the molecular and physiologic influences of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2450–2462PubMedCrossRef De Filippo RE, Atala A (2002) Stretch and growth: the molecular and physiologic influences of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2450–2462PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Edwards C, Marks R (1995) Evaluation of biomechanical properties of human skin. Clin Dermatol 13:375–380PubMedCrossRef Edwards C, Marks R (1995) Evaluation of biomechanical properties of human skin. Clin Dermatol 13:375–380PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Garnier D, Angonin R, Foulon P, Chavoin J, Ricbourg B, Costagliola M (1991) Le sillon sous-mammaire: Mythe ou réalité? Ann Chir Plast Esthet 36:313–319PubMed Garnier D, Angonin R, Foulon P, Chavoin J, Ricbourg B, Costagliola M (1991) Le sillon sous-mammaire: Mythe ou réalité? Ann Chir Plast Esthet 36:313–319PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gefen A, Dilmoney B (2007) Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. Technol Health Care 15:259–271PubMed Gefen A, Dilmoney B (2007) Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. Technol Health Care 15:259–271PubMed
12.
go back to reference Gere JM, Goodno BJ (2012) Mechanics of materials, 8th edn. Cengage Learning, Stanford Gere JM, Goodno BJ (2012) Mechanics of materials, 8th edn. Cengage Learning, Stanford
13.
go back to reference Gupta HN (2012) Manufacturing processes (as per the new syllabus, B. Tech. I year of U.P. Technical University). 2nd ed. New Age International, New Delhi Gupta HN (2012) Manufacturing processes (as per the new syllabus, B. Tech. I year of U.P. Technical University). 2nd ed. New Age International, New Delhi
14.
go back to reference Handel N (2006) Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:152S–163S discussion 64S–65S, 66S–67SPubMedCrossRef Handel N (2006) Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:152S–163S discussion 64S–65S, 66S–67SPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hibbeler RC (2011) Mechanics of materials, 8th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River Hibbeler RC (2011) Mechanics of materials, 8th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
16.
go back to reference Jinde L, Jianliang S, Xiaoping C, Xiaoyan T, Jiaqing L, Qun M et al (2006) Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1557–1560PubMedCrossRef Jinde L, Jianliang S, Xiaoping C, Xiaoyan T, Jiaqing L, Qun M et al (2006) Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1557–1560PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Johnson TM, Lowe L, Brown MD, Sullivan MJ, Nelson BR (1993) Histology and physiology of tissue expansion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19:1074–1078PubMedCrossRef Johnson TM, Lowe L, Brown MD, Sullivan MJ, Nelson BR (1993) Histology and physiology of tissue expansion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19:1074–1078PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lockwood T (1995) High-lateral-tension abdominoplasty with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:603–615PubMedCrossRef Lockwood T (1995) High-lateral-tension abdominoplasty with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:603–615PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lockwood T (1999) Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1411–1420PubMed Lockwood T (1999) Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1411–1420PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lockwood TE (1991) Superficial fascial system (SFS) of the trunk and extremities: a new concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1009–1018PubMedCrossRef Lockwood TE (1991) Superficial fascial system (SFS) of the trunk and extremities: a new concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1009–1018PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Miles AW, Gheduzzi S (2009) Basic biomechanics and biomaterials. Surg Oxf 27:90–95 Miles AW, Gheduzzi S (2009) Basic biomechanics and biomaterials. Surg Oxf 27:90–95
22.
go back to reference Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556 discussion 57PubMedCrossRef Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556 discussion 57PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E (1998) Focus on the breast fascial system: a new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1034–1045PubMed Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E (1998) Focus on the breast fascial system: a new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1034–1045PubMed
24.
go back to reference Riggio E, Quattrone P, Nava M (2000) Anatomical study of the breast superficial fascial system: the inframammary fold unit. Eur J Plast Surg 23:310–315CrossRef Riggio E, Quattrone P, Nava M (2000) Anatomical study of the breast superficial fascial system: the inframammary fold unit. Eur J Plast Surg 23:310–315CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Samani A, Bishop J, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB (2001) Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:271–279PubMedCrossRef Samani A, Bishop J, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB (2001) Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:271–279PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Song AY, Askari M, Azemi E, Alber S, Hurwitz DJ, Marra KG et al (2006) Biomechanical properties of the superficial fascial system. Aesthet Surg J 26:395–403PubMedCrossRef Song AY, Askari M, Azemi E, Alber S, Hurwitz DJ, Marra KG et al (2006) Biomechanical properties of the superficial fascial system. Aesthet Surg J 26:395–403PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sutradhar A, Miller MJ (2013) In vivo measurement of breast skin elasticity and breast skin thickness. Skin Res Technol 19:e191–e199PubMedCrossRef Sutradhar A, Miller MJ (2013) In vivo measurement of breast skin elasticity and breast skin thickness. Skin Res Technol 19:e191–e199PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396–1409 discussion 410–415PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396–1409 discussion 410–415PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:35S–45SPubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:35S–45SPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150–2159PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150–2159PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tepole AB, Ploch CJ, Wong J, Gosain AK, Kuhl E (2011) Growing skin: a computational model for skin expansion in reconstructive surgery. J Mech Phys Solids 59:2177–2190PubMedCrossRef Tepole AB, Ploch CJ, Wong J, Gosain AK, Kuhl E (2011) Growing skin: a computational model for skin expansion in reconstructive surgery. J Mech Phys Solids 59:2177–2190PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Young W, Budynas R (2001) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York Young W, Budynas R (2001) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Metadata
Title
Stiffness, Compliance, Resilience, and Creep Deformation: Understanding Implant-Soft Tissue Dynamics in the Augmented Breast: Fundamentals Based on Materials Science
Authors
Manuel R. Vegas
Jose L. Martin del Yerro
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0197-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2013 Go to the issue