Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2008

Open Access 01-02-2008 | Breast

Stereotactic large-core needle breast biopsy: analysis of pain and discomfort related to the biopsy procedure

Authors: Judith M. Hemmer, Johannes C. Kelder, Hans P. M. van Heesewijk

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of variables such as duration of the procedure, type of breast tissue, number of passes, depth of the biopsies, underlying pathology, the operator performing the procedure, and their effect on women’s perception of pain and discomfort during stereotactic large-core needle breast biopsy. One hundred and fifty consecutive patients with a non-palpable suspicious mammographic lesions were included. Between three and nine 14-gauge breast passes were taken using a prone stereotactic table. Following the biopsy procedure, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire. There was no discomfort in lying on the prone table. There is no relation between type of breast lesion and pain, underlying pathology and pain and performing operator and pain. The type of breast tissue is correlated with pain experienced from biopsy (P = 0.0001). We found out that patients with dense breast tissue complain of more pain from biopsy than patients with more involution of breast tissue. The depth of the biopsy correlates with pain from biopsy (P = 0.0028). Deep lesions are more painful than superficial ones. There is a correlation between the number of passes and pain in the neck (P = 0.0188) and shoulder (P = 0.0366). The duration of the procedure is correlated with pain experienced in the neck (P = 0.0116) but not with pain experienced from biopsy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H (2003) Minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy with 11-gauge needles—patient acceptance and effect on follow-up imaging findings. Radiology 226(3):783–790PubMedCrossRef Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H (2003) Minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy with 11-gauge needles—patient acceptance and effect on follow-up imaging findings. Radiology 226(3):783–790PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oyama T, Koibuchi Y, McKee G (2004) Core needle biopsy (CNB) as a diagnostic method for breast lesions: comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA). Breast Cancer 11(4):339–342PubMedCrossRef Oyama T, Koibuchi Y, McKee G (2004) Core needle biopsy (CNB) as a diagnostic method for breast lesions: comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA). Breast Cancer 11(4):339–342PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Denton ERE, Ryan S, Beaconfield T, Mitchell MJ (1999) Image-guided breast biopsy: analysis of pain and discomfort related to technique. Breast 8(5):257–260PubMedCrossRef Denton ERE, Ryan S, Beaconfield T, Mitchell MJ (1999) Image-guided breast biopsy: analysis of pain and discomfort related to technique. Breast 8(5):257–260PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348(17):1672–1680PubMedCrossRef Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348(17):1672–1680PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wallis M, Tarvidon A, Helbich Th, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of breast imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17(2):581–588PubMedCrossRef Wallis M, Tarvidon A, Helbich Th, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of breast imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17(2):581–588PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Liberman L (2000) Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(5):1191–1199PubMed Liberman L (2000) Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(5):1191–1199PubMed
7.
go back to reference Satchithananda K, Fernando RA, Ralleigh G, Evans DR, Wasan RK, Bose S, Donaldson N, Michell MJ (2005) An audit of pain/discomfort experienced during image-guided breast biopsy procedures. Breast 11(6):398–402CrossRef Satchithananda K, Fernando RA, Ralleigh G, Evans DR, Wasan RK, Bose S, Donaldson N, Michell MJ (2005) An audit of pain/discomfort experienced during image-guided breast biopsy procedures. Breast 11(6):398–402CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Verkooijen HM, Buskens F, Peeters PH, Borel Rinkes IH, de Koning HJ, van Vroonhoven TJ; COBRA Study Group (2002) Diagnosing non-palpable breast disease: short-term impact on quality of life of large-core needle biopsy versus open breast biopsy. Surg Oncol 10(4):177–181PubMedCrossRef Verkooijen HM, Buskens F, Peeters PH, Borel Rinkes IH, de Koning HJ, van Vroonhoven TJ; COBRA Study Group (2002) Diagnosing non-palpable breast disease: short-term impact on quality of life of large-core needle biopsy versus open breast biopsy. Surg Oncol 10(4):177–181PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference van Goethem M, Mortelmans D, Bruyninckx E, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, van Hove E, de Schepper A (2003) Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography. Eur Radiol 13(10)2384–2389PubMedCrossRef van Goethem M, Mortelmans D, Bruyninckx E, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, van Hove E, de Schepper A (2003) Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography. Eur Radiol 13(10)2384–2389PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mainiero MB, Gareen IF, Bird CE, Smith W, Cobb C, Schepps B (2002) Preferential use of sonographically guided biopsy to minimize patient discomfort and procedure time in a percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy program. J Ultrasound Med 21(11):1221–1226PubMed Mainiero MB, Gareen IF, Bird CE, Smith W, Cobb C, Schepps B (2002) Preferential use of sonographically guided biopsy to minimize patient discomfort and procedure time in a percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy program. J Ultrasound Med 21(11):1221–1226PubMed
Metadata
Title
Stereotactic large-core needle breast biopsy: analysis of pain and discomfort related to the biopsy procedure
Authors
Judith M. Hemmer
Johannes C. Kelder
Hans P. M. van Heesewijk
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0762-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

European Radiology 2/2008 Go to the issue