Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Letter to the Editor

Statistical model ignores ‘age’, products of peak Q and a–vO2 difference greatly exceed \(\dot{\text {V}}{\text{O}_{2}}\hbox{max}\) and different ergometers confound validity

Authors: Roger Eston, Adrian Esterman

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

The rationale for the study of Jenkins et al. (2016) is founded on the previous reports of higher \(\dot{\text {V}}{\text{O}_{2}}\hbox{max}\) from SPV compared to standard incremental protocols. Reference to additional studies which observed similar \(\dot{\text {V}}{\text{O}_{2}}\hbox{max}\) and/or VEmax (e.g. Hanson et al. 2016 among others) during SPV would be informative, especially given the problem of comparing \(\dot{\text {V}}{\text{O}_{2}}\hbox{max}\) (or any other measure) from SPV against standard protocols when different ergometers are used (Eston et al. 2014). …
Literature
go back to reference Astorino TA, McMillan DW, Edmunds RM, Sanchez E (2015) Increased cardiac output elicits higher VO2max in response to self-paced exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40:223–229CrossRefPubMed Astorino TA, McMillan DW, Edmunds RM, Sanchez E (2015) Increased cardiac output elicits higher VO2max in response to self-paced exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40:223–229CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beltz NM, Gibson AL, Janot JM, Kravitz L, Mermier CM, Dalleck LC (2016) Graded exercise testing protocols for the determination of VO2max: historical perspectives, progress, and future considerations. J Sports Med. doi:10.1155/2016/3968393 Beltz NM, Gibson AL, Janot JM, Kravitz L, Mermier CM, Dalleck LC (2016) Graded exercise testing protocols for the determination of VO2max: historical perspectives, progress, and future considerations. J Sports Med. doi:10.​1155/​2016/​3968393
go back to reference Eston RG, Crockett A, Jones AM (2014) Discussion of “The efficacy of the self-paced VO2max test to measure maximal oxygen uptake in treadmill running”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 39:581–582CrossRefPubMed Eston RG, Crockett A, Jones AM (2014) Discussion of “The efficacy of the self-paced VO2max test to measure maximal oxygen uptake in treadmill running”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 39:581–582CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hanson NJ, Scheadler CM, Lee TL, Neuenfeldt NC, Michael TJ, Miller MG (2016) Modality determines VO2max achieved in self-paced exercise tests: validation with the Bruce protocol. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1313–1319CrossRefPubMed Hanson NJ, Scheadler CM, Lee TL, Neuenfeldt NC, Michael TJ, Miller MG (2016) Modality determines VO2max achieved in self-paced exercise tests: validation with the Bruce protocol. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1313–1319CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jenkins LA, Mauger AR, Hopker JG (2016) Age differences in physiological responses to self-paced and incremental VO2max testing. Eur J Appl Physiol 117(1):159–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jenkins LA, Mauger AR, Hopker JG (2016) Age differences in physiological responses to self-paced and incremental VO2max testing. Eur J Appl Physiol 117(1):159–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Mauger AR, Metcalfe AJ, Taylor L, Castle PC (2013) The efficacy of the self-paced VO2max test to measure maximal oxygen uptake in treadmill running. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 38:1211–1216CrossRefPubMed Mauger AR, Metcalfe AJ, Taylor L, Castle PC (2013) The efficacy of the self-paced VO2max test to measure maximal oxygen uptake in treadmill running. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 38:1211–1216CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Statistical model ignores ‘age’, products of peak Q and a–vO2 difference greatly exceed and different ergometers confound validity
Authors
Roger Eston
Adrian Esterman
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3577-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

European Journal of Applied Physiology 5/2017 Go to the issue