Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2002

Open Access 01-12-2002 | Research article

Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening

Authors: Stuart G Baker, Barnett S Kramer, Philip C Prorok

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2002

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The evaluation of randomized trials for cancer screening involves special statistical considerations not found in therapeutic trials. Although some of these issues have been discussed previously, we present important recent and new methodologies.

Methods

Our emphasis is on simple approaches.

Results

We make the following recommendations:
(1) Use death from cancer as the primary endpoint, but review death records carefully and report all causes of death
(2) Use a simple "causal" estimate to adjust for nonattendance and contamination occurring immediately after randomization
(3) Use a simple adaptive estimate to adjust for dilution in follow-up after the last screen

Conclusion

The proposed guidelines combine recent methodological work on screening endpoints and noncompliance/contamination with a new adaptive method to adjust for dilution in a study where follow-up continues after the last screen. These guidelines ensure good practice in the design and analysis of randomized trials of cancer screening.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Etzioni RD, Connor RJ, Prorok PC, Self SG: Design and analysis of cancer screening trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1995, 4: 3-17.CrossRefPubMed Etzioni RD, Connor RJ, Prorok PC, Self SG: Design and analysis of cancer screening trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1995, 4: 3-17.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Connor RJ, Prorok PC: Issues in the mortality analysis of randomized controlled trials of cancer screening. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1994, 15: 81-99. 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90014-0.CrossRefPubMed Connor RJ, Prorok PC: Issues in the mortality analysis of randomized controlled trials of cancer screening. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1994, 15: 81-99. 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90014-0.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Black WC, Haggstrom DA, Welch HG: All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002, 94: 167-173. 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167.CrossRefPubMed Black WC, Haggstrom DA, Welch HG: All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002, 94: 167-173. 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, James PD, Mangham CM: Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996, 348: 1472-1477. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7.CrossRefPubMed Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, James PD, Mangham CM: Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996, 348: 1472-1477. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Glasziou PP: Meta-analysis adjusting for compliance: The example of screening for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1992, 1251-1256. Glasziou PP: Meta-analysis adjusting for compliance: The example of screening for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1992, 1251-1256.
6.
go back to reference Baker SG, Lindeman KS: The paired availability design: A proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor. Statistics in Medicine. 1994, 13: 2269-2278.CrossRefPubMed Baker SG, Lindeman KS: The paired availability design: A proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor. Statistics in Medicine. 1994, 13: 2269-2278.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DR: Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996, 92: 444-455.CrossRef Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DR: Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996, 92: 444-455.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baker SG: Analysis of survival data from a randomized trial with all-or-none compliance; estimating the cost-effectiveness of a cancer screening program. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1998, 93: 929-934.CrossRef Baker SG: Analysis of survival data from a randomized trial with all-or-none compliance; estimating the cost-effectiveness of a cancer screening program. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1998, 93: 929-934.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cuzick J, Edward R, Segnan N: Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1997, 16: 1017-1029. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::AID-SIM508>3.0.CO;2-V.CrossRefPubMed Cuzick J, Edward R, Segnan N: Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1997, 16: 1017-1029. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::AID-SIM508>3.0.CO;2-V.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McIntosh MW: Instrumental variables when evaluating screening trials: estimating the benefit of detecting cancer by screening. Stat Med. 1999, 19: 2775-2794. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2775::AID-SIM196>3.0.CO;2-I.CrossRef McIntosh MW: Instrumental variables when evaluating screening trials: estimating the benefit of detecting cancer by screening. Stat Med. 1999, 19: 2775-2794. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2775::AID-SIM196>3.0.CO;2-I.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zelen M: A new design for randomized clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine. 1979, 300: 1242-1145.CrossRefPubMed Zelen M: A new design for randomized clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine. 1979, 300: 1242-1145.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shaprio S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L: Periodic Screening for Breast Cancer, The Health Insurance Plan Project and Its Sequelae, 1963–1986, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press. 1988 Shaprio S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L: Periodic Screening for Breast Cancer, The Health Insurance Plan Project and Its Sequelae, 1963–1986, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press. 1988
13.
go back to reference Etzioni R, Self SG: On the catch-up time method for analyzing cancer screening trials. Biometrics. 1995, 51: 31-43.CrossRefPubMed Etzioni R, Self SG: On the catch-up time method for analyzing cancer screening trials. Biometrics. 1995, 51: 31-43.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Self SG, Etzioni R: A likelihood ratio test for cancer screening trials. Biometrics. 1995, 51: 44-50.CrossRefPubMed Self SG, Etzioni R: A likelihood ratio test for cancer screening trials. Biometrics. 1995, 51: 44-50.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Buyske S, Fagerstrom R, Ying Z: A class of weighted log-rank tests for survival data when the event is rare. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2000, 95: 249-258.CrossRef Buyske S, Fagerstrom R, Ying Z: A class of weighted log-rank tests for survival data when the event is rare. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2000, 95: 249-258.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hu P, Zelen M: Planning clinical trials to evaluate early detection programmes. Biometrka. 1997, 84: 817-829.CrossRef Hu P, Zelen M: Planning clinical trials to evaluate early detection programmes. Biometrka. 1997, 84: 817-829.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M: Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994, 86: 829-835.CrossRefPubMed Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M: Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994, 86: 829-835.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Efron B, Gong G: A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. American Statistician. 1983, 37: 36-48. Efron B, Gong G: A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. American Statistician. 1983, 37: 36-48.
20.
go back to reference Baker SG, Tockman MS: Evaluating serial observations of precancerous lesions for further study as a trigger for early intervention. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 2383-2390. 10.1002/sim.1194.CrossRefPubMed Baker SG, Tockman MS: Evaluating serial observations of precancerous lesions for further study as a trigger for early intervention. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 2383-2390. 10.1002/sim.1194.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng S, Potter JD, Thompson ML, Thornquist M, Winget M, Yasui Y: Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001, 93: 1054-1061. 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054.CrossRefPubMed Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng S, Potter JD, Thompson ML, Thornquist M, Winget M, Yasui Y: Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001, 93: 1054-1061. 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cronin KA, Weed DL, Connor RJ, Prorok PC: Case-control studies of cancer screening: Theory and practice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1998, 90: 498-504. 10.1093/jnci/90.7.498.CrossRefPubMed Cronin KA, Weed DL, Connor RJ, Prorok PC: Case-control studies of cancer screening: Theory and practice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1998, 90: 498-504. 10.1093/jnci/90.7.498.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Baker SG: Evaluating the age to begin periodic breast cancer screening using data from a few regularly scheduled screens. Biometrics. 1998, 54: 1569-1578.CrossRefPubMed Baker SG: Evaluating the age to begin periodic breast cancer screening using data from a few regularly scheduled screens. Biometrics. 1998, 54: 1569-1578.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Baker SG: Evaluating periodic cancer screening without a randomized control group: a simplified design and analysis. In: Quantitative Methods for the Evaluation of Cancer Screening,. Edited by: Duffy SW, Hill C, Esteve J. 2001, London: Edward Arnold Limited,, 34-41. Baker SG: Evaluating periodic cancer screening without a randomized control group: a simplified design and analysis. In: Quantitative Methods for the Evaluation of Cancer Screening,. Edited by: Duffy SW, Hill C, Esteve J. 2001, London: Edward Arnold Limited,, 34-41.
Metadata
Title
Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening
Authors
Stuart G Baker
Barnett S Kramer
Philip C Prorok
Publication date
01-12-2002
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2002
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-2-11

Other articles of this Issue 1/2002

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2002 Go to the issue