Top

Trials

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Update

Statistical analysis plan for an international, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on the use of phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain

Authors: Eva Lendaro, Eric J. Earley, Max Ortiz-Catalan

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a detrimental condition that can greatly diminish the quality of life. Purposeful control over the phantom limb activates the affected neural circuitry and leads to dissolution of the pathological relationship linking sensorimotor and pain processing (which gives rise to PLP). An international, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) on the use of phantom motor execution (PME) as a treatment for PLP is currently undertaken, where PME is compared to an active placebo treatment, namely phantom motor imagery (PMI).

Methods and design

Sixty-seven subjects suffering from PLP in upper or lower limbs are randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to PME or PMI interventions respectively. Subjects allocated to either treatment receive 15 interventions where they are exposed to the same VR-AR environments using the same device. The only difference between interventions is whether phantom movements are performed (PME) or imagined (PMI).

Results

The primary outcome of the study is to examine whether 15 sessions of PME can induce a greater PLP relief, compared to PMI. The secondary objectives are to examine whether 15 sessions of PME provide a greater improvement in different aspects related to PLP compared to PMI, such as pain duration, pain intensity as measured by other metrics, and the patient’s own impression about the effect of treatment. Long-term retention of treatment benefits will be assessed as change in all the variables (both primary and secondary) between baseline and follow-up timepoints (at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment).

Conclusion

This manuscript serves as the formal statistical analysis plan (version 1.0) for the international, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on the use of PME as a treatment for PLP. The statistical analysis plan was completed on 3 August 2021.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT03112928. Registered on April 13, 2017

SAP version: version: 1.0, date: 2021/08/03

Protocol version: This document has been written based on information contained in the study protocol published in Lendaro et al. (BMJ Open 8:e021039, 2018), in July 2018.

SAP revisions: Not applicable

Available only for authorised users

Schwingler PM, et al. Prevalence of postamputation pain and its subtypes: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. 2021;6:1–6.

Stankevicius A, Wallwork SB, Summers SJ, Hordacre B, Stanton TR. Prevalence and incidence of phantom limb pain, phantom limb sensations and telescoping in amputees: a systematic rapid review. Eur J Pain (United Kingdom). 2021;25(1):23–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1657.CrossRef

Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Gall NG. A survey of current phantom limb pain treatment in the United States. Pain. 1980;8(1):85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(80)90092-5.CrossRefPubMed

Richardson C, Kulkarni J. A review of the management of phantom limb pain: challenges and solutions. J Pain Res. 2017;10:1861–70. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S124664.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Alviar MJM, Hale T, Lim-Dungca M. Pharmacologic interventions for treating phantom limb pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006380.pub3.

Moura VL, Faurot KR, Gaylord SA, Mann JD, Sill M, Lynch C, et al. Mind-body interventions for treatment of phantom limb pain in persons with amputation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(8):701–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182466034.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Halbert J, Crotty M, Cameron ID. Evidence for the optimal management of acute and chronic phantom pain: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(2):84–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200203000-00003.CrossRefPubMed

Batsford S, Ryan CG, Martin DJ. Non-pharmacological conservative therapy for phantom limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(3):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1288283.CrossRefPubMed

Limakatso K, Parker R. Treatment recommendations for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: an expert consensus Delphi study. PM\&R. 2021:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12556.

10.

Di Pino G, Piombino V, Carassiti M, Ortiz-Catalan M. Neurophysiological models of phantom limb pain: what can be learnt. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87(4):481–7. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.20.15067-3.CrossRef

11.

Chan AW, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Chinese J Evidence-Based Med. 2013;13(12):1501–7. https://doi.org/10.7507/1672-2531.20130256.CrossRef

12.

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340(mar23 1):c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Dwan K, Altman DG, Clarke M, Gamble C, Higgins JP, Sterne JA, et al. Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2014;11(6):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001666.CrossRef

14.

Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291(20):2457–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.20.2457.CrossRef

15.

Gamble C, Krishan A, Stocken D, Lewis S, Juszczak E, Doré C, et al. Guidelines for the content of statistical analysis plans in clinical trials. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318(23):2337–43. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18556.CrossRef

16.

Ortiz-Catalan M, Sander N, Kristoffersen MB, Håkansson B, Brånemark R. Treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) based on augmented reality and gaming controlled by myoelectric pattern recognition: a case study of a chronic PLP patient. Front. Neurosci. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00024.

17.

Ortiz-Catalan M, Guðmundsdóttir RA, Kristoffersen MB, Zepeda-Echavarria A, Caine-Winterberger K, Kulbacka-Ortiz K, et al. Phantom motor execution facilitated by machine learning and augmented reality as treatment for Phantom Limb Pain. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2885–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31598-7.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lendaro E, Mastinu E, Håkansson B, Ortiz-Catalan M. Real-time classification of non-weight bearing lower-limb movements using EMG to facilitate phantom motor execution: engineering and case study application on phantom limb pain. Front Neurol. 2017;8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00470.CrossRef

19.

Ortiz-Catalan M. The stochastic entanglement and phantom motor execution hypotheses: a theoretical framework for the origin and treatment of phantom limb pain. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00748.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Lendaro E, et al. Phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain: protocol of an international, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e021039. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Taves DR. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974;15(5):443–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt1974155443.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Pocock SJ. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial Author ( s ): Stuart J . Pocock and Richard Simon. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–15 Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529712.CrossRef

23.

Saghaei M. Implementation of an open-source customizable minimization program for allocation of patients to parallel groups in clinical trials. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2011;04:734–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2011.411090.CrossRef

24.

Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(3):277–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RMM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Dmitrienko A, D’Agostino RB. Multiplicity considerations in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2115–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1709701.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rowbotham MC. What is a ‘clinically meaningful’ reduction in pain. Pain. 2001;94(2):131–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00371-2.CrossRefPubMed

29.

MATLAB. 9.10.0 (R2021a): The MathWorks Inc.; 2021.

Title: Statistical analysis plan for an international, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on the use of phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain
Authors: Eva Lendaro
Eric J. Earley
Max Ortiz-Catalan
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05962-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Statistical analysis plan for an international, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on the use of phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain

Abstract

Background

Methods and design

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods and design

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Effects of double vs triple injection on block dynamics for ultrasound-guided intertruncal approach to the supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper limb arteriovenous access surgery: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Pediatric Tuina in children with autism spectrum disorder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Effect of perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy on chronic post-surgical pain among breast cancer patients with high pain catastrophising characteristics: protocol for a double-blinded randomised controlled trial

Effect of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization on balance and trunk function in people with multiple sclerosis: protocol for a randomized control trial

A nationwide randomized controlled trial on additional treatment for isolated local pancreatic cancer recurrence using stereotactic body radiation therapy (ARCADE)

Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples