Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Computed Tomography

Statistical analysis for obtaining optimum number of CT scanners in patient dose surveys for determining national diagnostic reference levels

Authors: Mehdi Sohrabi, Masoumeh Parsi, Sanaz Hariri Tabrizi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To statistically determine an ‘optimum number of CT scanners’ for obtaining ‘diagnostic reference levels’ (DRLs) in CT examinations as close as possible to ‘ideal DRLs’ when all available CT scanners are considered.

Methods

First, six ‘ideal DRLs’ (CTDIVol and DLP) were determined for head, chest and abdomen/pelvis examinations by using patient-dose survey data of 100 CT scanners of different models in Tehran. Then, a ‘random sampling method’ was applied to different percent fractions of patient dose data of 100 CT scanners. The percent differences (PD) of the DRLs obtained from ‘ideal DRLs’ and their coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated. The ‘optimum number of CT scanners’ determined met those of ‘ideal DRL’ criteria; i.e. precision (CV ≤ 10%) and accuracy (PD ≤ 10%).

Results

‘Optimum number of CT scanners’ for determining DRLs as close as possible to ‘ideal DRLs’, fulfilling the stated criteria, is 43 instead of using 100.

Conclusion

‘Optimum number of CT scanners’ for obtaining DRLs as close as possible to ‘ideal DRLs’ was determined. This optimum number can be effectively applied in patient-dose survey situations with limited resources in a time- and cost-effective manner.

Key Points

• Ideal DRLs were determined by a CT patient-dose survey applied to available scanners.
• ‘Optimum number of CT scanners’ statistically determined for DRLs is 43%.
• Optimum number can be used for DRLs as if ‘ideal DRLs’ were determined by all scanners.
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2008) Report Vol. I. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Sales Publications, New York United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2008) Report Vol. I. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Sales Publications, New York
2.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report No. 160. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP, Bethesda National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report No. 160. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP, Bethesda
3.
go back to reference European Commission (2008) European guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures. Report Radiation Protection 154 (with Annexes) European Commission (2008) European guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures. Report Radiation Protection 154 (with Annexes)
4.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) ICRP Publication 87. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Ann ICRP 30(4) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) ICRP Publication 87. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Ann ICRP 30(4)
5.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) ICRP Publication 60. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21(1–3) International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) ICRP Publication 60. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21(1–3)
6.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1996) ICRP Publication 73. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Ann ICRP 26(2) International Commission on Radiological Protection (1996) ICRP Publication 73. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Ann ICRP 26(2)
7.
go back to reference European Commission (1999) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium European Commission (1999) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium
8.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 102. Managing Patient Dose in Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT). Ann ICRP 37(1) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 102. Managing Patient Dose in Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT). Ann ICRP 37(1)
9.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 105. Radiological protection in medicine. Ann ICRP 37(6) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 105. Radiological protection in medicine. Ann ICRP 37(6)
10.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2017) ICRP Publication 135. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46(1) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2017) ICRP Publication 135. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46(1)
11.
go back to reference Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL (2017) US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284(1):120–133CrossRef Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL (2017) US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284(1):120–133CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R (2017) A quality-control-based correction method’ for displayed dose indices on CT scanner consoles in patient dose surveys. Phys Med 38:88–92CrossRef Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R (2017) A quality-control-based correction method’ for displayed dose indices on CT scanner consoles in patient dose surveys. Phys Med 38:88–92CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R (2018) Determination of examination-specific diagnostic reference level in computed tomography by a new quality-control-based dose survey method. Health Phys 114(3):273–281CrossRef Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R (2018) Determination of examination-specific diagnostic reference level in computed tomography by a new quality-control-based dose survey method. Health Phys 114(3):273–281CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sohrabi M, Parsi M, Mianji F (2017) Determination of national diagnostic reference levels in Computed Tomography examinations of Iran by a new quality control-based dose survey method. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 10:1–10 Sohrabi M, Parsi M, Mianji F (2017) Determination of national diagnostic reference levels in Computed Tomography examinations of Iran by a new quality control-based dose survey method. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 10:1–10
15.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2002) Supporting guidance 2. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Annals ICRP 31(Suppl. 4):33–52 International Commission on Radiological Protection (2002) Supporting guidance 2. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Annals ICRP 31(Suppl. 4):33–52
16.
go back to reference Miller DL, Vano E, Rehani MM (2015) Reducing radiation, revising reference levels. J Am Coll Radiol 12(3):214–216CrossRef Miller DL, Vano E, Rehani MM (2015) Reducing radiation, revising reference levels. J Am Coll Radiol 12(3):214–216CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Taylor S, Van Muylem A, Howarth N, Gevenois PA, Tack D (2017) CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision? Eur Radiol 27(1):365–373CrossRef Taylor S, Van Muylem A, Howarth N, Gevenois PA, Tack D (2017) CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision? Eur Radiol 27(1):365–373CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Statistical analysis for obtaining optimum number of CT scanners in patient dose surveys for determining national diagnostic reference levels
Authors
Mehdi Sohrabi
Masoumeh Parsi
Sanaz Hariri Tabrizi
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5547-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Radiology 1/2019 Go to the issue