Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2016

01-06-2016 | Editorial

Start from Scratch: the Prospect of Nuclear Cardiology

Author: Won Woo Lee

Published in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

The future is always hard to forecast but the prospect of nuclear cardiology has never been more unobtainable than these days. Myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) has been one of the major nuclear medicine studies for decades, but the annual number of MPS is stagnant or steadily decreasing in Korea and other countries [1]. The challenge from coronary computed tomography (CCT) and the concern of radiation exposure of MPS [2] were the main reasons for the stalemate of nuclear cardiology. Compared to the rapid technological progress of CCT, enabling greater image resolution in conjunction with lower radiation exposure to the patients, development of new radiopharmaceuticals or scintillation imaging techniques has been at a relatively slow pace. Positron emission tomography (PET) has many advantages over MPS in terms of image resolution and radiation exposure. N-13 ammonia, O-15 H2O, and Rb-82 are the PET perfusion agents, which are widely used all over the world. However, the capacity of cyclotrons for N-13 ammonia and O-15 H2O usually limits the number of PET perfusion studies, and the generator for Rb-82 is not imported to Korea yet. F-18 labeled myocardial perfusion agent is under clinical trial in the U.S. [3] but even after the approval for clinical application, the cost of F-18 agent may not be readily affordable for the time being. When it comes to the development of imaging techniques, semi-conductor detector is worthy of mention [4]. The CdZnTe (CZT) detector-based cardiac gamma cameras from two manufacturers are already on the market, and two national institutes installed each model from the two vendors. The capabilities of the CZT gamma cameras are reported to exceed those of conventional Anger type gamma cameras: >2 times the spatial resolution, >1.5 times the energy resolution, and 5∼10 times the sensitivity, which will make it possible to reduce the patient dose or the imaging acquisition time [4]. However, it remains to be seen whether the diagnostic efficacy for coronary artery disease is improved using those CZT gamma cameras compared to the traditional gamma cameras because the unique L-type gantry structure of CZT gamma camera may lead to spatial inhomogeneity regarding the signal detection efficiency [5]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rozanski A, Gransar H, Hayes SW, Min J, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, et al. Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1054–65.CrossRefPubMed Rozanski A, Gransar H, Hayes SW, Min J, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, et al. Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1054–65.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:709–18.CrossRefPubMed Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:709–18.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Berman DS, Maddahi J, Tamarappoo BK, Czernin J, Taillefer R, Udelson JE, et al. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:469–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berman DS, Maddahi J, Tamarappoo BK, Czernin J, Taillefer R, Udelson JE, et al. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:469–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, Nagler M, Sandler M, Patton J, et al. A novel high-sensitivity rapid-acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:635–43.CrossRefPubMed Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, Nagler M, Sandler M, Patton J, et al. A novel high-sensitivity rapid-acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:635–43.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kennedy JA, Israel O, Frenkel A. 3D iteratively reconstructed spatial resolution map and sensitivity characterization of a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:443–52.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy JA, Israel O, Frenkel A. 3D iteratively reconstructed spatial resolution map and sensitivity characterization of a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:443–52.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Irkle A, Vesey AT, Lewis DY, Skepper JN, Bird JL, Dweck MR, et al. Identifying active vascular microcalcification by (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Irkle A, Vesey AT, Lewis DY, Skepper JN, Bird JL, Dweck MR, et al. Identifying active vascular microcalcification by (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Bailey DL, Willowson KP. An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:83–9.CrossRefPubMed Bailey DL, Willowson KP. An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:83–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Start from Scratch: the Prospect of Nuclear Cardiology
Author
Won Woo Lee
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1869-3474
Electronic ISSN: 1869-3482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-016-0414-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2016 Go to the issue