Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2007

01-12-2007

Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A Prospective Study From Pathology to Clinical Outcome

Authors: Pierpaolo Sileri, Vito Maria Stolfi, Giampiero Palmieri, Alessandra Mele, Alessandro Falchetti, Sara Di Carlo, Achille Lucio Gaspari

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is widely accepted to treat hemorrhoids, but serious complications have been reported. In this prospective audit, we correlated clinical outcome with pathological findings. From January 2003 to April 2007, 94 patients underwent hemorrhoidopexy. Macroscopic appearance of the specimen (shape, size, and depth) was recorded. Microscopically, the presence of columnar, transitional, and squamous epithelium, the involvement of circular/longitudinal smooth muscle, and features of mucosal prolapse were assessed. Clinical outcome was evaluated by a validated questionnaire. Postoperative pain, secretion, and bleeding durations were 12.7 +/− 10.6, 5.6 +/− 9.6, and 6.3 +/− 8.4 days. Patient’s return to work averaged 16.7 +/− 10.7 days. Fissure, skin tags, and anal strictures were observed in 23.4%. Seven patients experienced pain for a significantly longer period of time. All specimens contained columnar mucosa, but 29.8% contained columnar and transitional epithelium and 12.8% contained columnar, anal transitional, and stratified squamous epithelium. Smooth muscle was observed in 62.7%. Pain was significantly increased if transitional epithelium was present in the specimen. No correlation or differences were observed if smooth muscle was present, although postoperative bleeding was more frequent. Hemorrhoidopexy is safe and effective. The specimen should always be sent for pathology examination. Only columnar epithelium should be present and, although the presence of smooth muscle does not influence the outcome in terms of functional results, its presence may play a role in postoperative bleeding.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roswell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:779–781.CrossRef Roswell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:779–781.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled and open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;88:669–674.CrossRef Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled and open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;88:669–674.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Slawik S, Kenefick N, Greenslade L, Dixon AR. A prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy/rectal mucosectomy in the management of 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2006;9:352–356.CrossRef Slawik S, Kenefick N, Greenslade L, Dixon AR. A prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy/rectal mucosectomy in the management of 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2006;9:352–356.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S, Degregori S, Merigliano S. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile? Colorectal Dis 2005;8:130–134.CrossRef Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S, Degregori S, Merigliano S. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile? Colorectal Dis 2005;8:130–134.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference McCloud JM, Jameson JS, Scott ND. Life-threating sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:748–755.PubMedCrossRef McCloud JM, Jameson JS, Scott ND. Life-threating sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:748–755.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, 1998, pp 777–784. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, 1998, pp 777–784.
7.
go back to reference George BD, Shetty D, Lindsey I, Mortensen NJ, Warren BF. Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note. Colorectal Dis 2001;4:473–476.CrossRef George BD, Shetty D, Lindsey I, Mortensen NJ, Warren BF. Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note. Colorectal Dis 2001;4:473–476.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beattie GC, McAdam TK, McIntosh SA, Loudon MA. Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2005;8:56–61.CrossRef Beattie GC, McAdam TK, McIntosh SA, Loudon MA. Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2005;8:56–61.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Tsachalis T, Betsis D. Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for third-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:47–49.PubMedCrossRef Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Tsachalis T, Betsis D. Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for third-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:47–49.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:164–168.PubMedCrossRef Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:164–168.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McDonald PJ, Bona R, Cohen CRG. Rectovaginal fistula after stapled haemorrhoidopexy (letter). Colorectal Dis 2004;6:64–65.PubMedCrossRef McDonald PJ, Bona R, Cohen CRG. Rectovaginal fistula after stapled haemorrhoidopexy (letter). Colorectal Dis 2004;6:64–65.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Corman ML, Graviè JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, Mascagni D, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party-indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:304–310.PubMedCrossRef Corman ML, Graviè JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, Mascagni D, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party-indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:304–310.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shanmugam V, Watson AJM, Chapman AD, Binnie NR, Loudon A. Pathological audit of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 2004;7:172–175.CrossRef Shanmugam V, Watson AJM, Chapman AD, Binnie NR, Loudon A. Pathological audit of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 2004;7:172–175.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ho Y-H, Seow-Cohen F, Tsang C, Eu K-W. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–1455.PubMedCrossRef Ho Y-H, Seow-Cohen F, Tsang C, Eu K-W. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–1455.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL. Complications of stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005;29:429–433.PubMedCrossRef Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL. Complications of stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005;29:429–433.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al. Complications after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2003;6:83–88.CrossRef Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al. Complications after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2003;6:83–88.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Philips RKS. A randomised, controlled trial of diathermy haemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:491–497.PubMedCrossRef Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Philips RKS. A randomised, controlled trial of diathermy haemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:491–497.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Filingeri V, Gravante G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy followed by fecal urgency and tenesmus: methodological complication or surgeon’s mistake? Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:149–153.PubMedCrossRef Filingeri V, Gravante G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy followed by fecal urgency and tenesmus: methodological complication or surgeon’s mistake? Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:149–153.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M et al. Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1846–1851.PubMedCrossRef Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M et al. Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1846–1851.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Philips RKS. Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled haemorroidectomy. Lancet 2000;26:730–733.CrossRef Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Philips RKS. Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled haemorroidectomy. Lancet 2000;26:730–733.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1049–1053.PubMedCrossRef Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1049–1053.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomised clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1376–1381.PubMedCrossRef Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomised clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1376–1381.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Mantzoros I, Odisseos CD. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan–Morgan excision for treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 2002;168:621–625.PubMedCrossRef Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Mantzoros I, Odisseos CD. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan–Morgan excision for treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 2002;168:621–625.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A Prospective Study From Pathology to Clinical Outcome
Authors
Pierpaolo Sileri
Vito Maria Stolfi
Giampiero Palmieri
Alessandra Mele
Alessandro Falchetti
Sara Di Carlo
Achille Lucio Gaspari
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0328-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2007 Go to the issue