Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2006

01-10-2006 | Original Paper

Stability of anterior vertebral body screws after kyphoplasty augmentation

An experimental study to compare anterior vertebral body screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement

Authors: O. Linhardt, C. Lüring, J. Matussek, C. Hamberger, T. Herold, W. Plitz, J. Grifka

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The goal of this cadaver study was to compare the stability of anterior vertebral body screws after implantation in soft or cured kyphoplasty cement. Anterior vertebral body screws were inserted in a total of 30 thoracolumbar vertebrae of ten different human specimens: ten screws were implanted in non-augmented vertebrae (group 1), ten screws were placed in soft cement (group 2), and ten screws were placed in cured cement (group 3). The screws were then tested for biomechanical axial pullout resistance. Mean axial pullout strength was 192 N (range: 10–430 N) in group 1, 364 N (range: 65–875 N) in group 2, and 271 N (range: 35–625 N) in group 3. The paired Student’s t-test demonstrated a significant difference between pullout strength of groups 1 and 2 (p= 0.0475). No significant difference was seen between pullout strength of groups 1 and 3 (p= 0.2646) and between groups 2 and 3 (p= 0.3863). We achieved a 1.9 times higher pullout strength with kyphoplasty augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae compared with the pullout strength of non-augmented vertebrae. Implantation of anterior vertebral body screws in cured cement is a satisfactory method. With this method we found a 1.4 times higher pullout strength than non-augmented vertebrae.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bai Bo, Kummer J, Spivak J (2001) Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute. Spine 26(24):2679–2683CrossRefPubMed Bai Bo, Kummer J, Spivak J (2001) Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute. Spine 26(24):2679–2683CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cohen JE, Lylyk P, Ceratto R, Kaplan L, Umanskyt F, Gomori JM (2004) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: technique and results in 192 procedures. Neurol Res 26(1):41–49CrossRefPubMed Cohen JE, Lylyk P, Ceratto R, Kaplan L, Umanskyt F, Gomori JM (2004) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: technique and results in 192 procedures. Neurol Res 26(1):41–49CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 18:311–323PubMed Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 18:311–323PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL (1994) Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol 15:83–86PubMed Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL (1994) Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol 15:83–86PubMed
5.
go back to reference Garfin S, Hansen A, Reiley M (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515CrossRefPubMed Garfin S, Hansen A, Reiley M (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. Am J Neuroradiol 18:1897–1904PubMed Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. Am J Neuroradiol 18:1897–1904PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kaneda K, Fujiya N, Satoh S (1986) Results with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop 205:195–203PubMed Kaneda K, Fujiya N, Satoh S (1986) Results with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop 205:195–203PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kostuik JP, Carl A, Ferron S (1989) Anterior Zielke instrumentation for spinal deformity in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:898–912PubMed Kostuik JP, Carl A, Ferron S (1989) Anterior Zielke instrumentation for spinal deformity in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:898–912PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kostuik JP, Errico TJ, Gleason TF (1986) Techniques of internal fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 203:219–231PubMed Kostuik JP, Errico TJ, Gleason TF (1986) Techniques of internal fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 203:219–231PubMed
11.
go back to reference Moe JH, Purcell GA, Bradford DS (1983) Zielke instrumentation (VDS) for the correction of spinal curvature: analysis of results in 66 patients. Clin Orthop 180:133–153PubMed Moe JH, Purcell GA, Bradford DS (1983) Zielke instrumentation (VDS) for the correction of spinal curvature: analysis of results in 66 patients. Clin Orthop 180:133–153PubMed
12.
go back to reference Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM (2003) The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 28:1549–1554CrossRefPubMed Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM (2003) The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 28:1549–1554CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C (1994) Repair of failed transpedicular screw fixation: a biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine 19:350–353PubMedCrossRef Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C (1994) Repair of failed transpedicular screw fixation: a biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine 19:350–353PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Renner S, Lim T, Kim W, Katolik L, An H, Andersson G (2004) Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine 29(11):212–216CrossRef Renner S, Lim T, Kim W, Katolik L, An H, Andersson G (2004) Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine 29(11):212–216CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sarzier JS, Evans AJ, Cahill DW (2002) Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines. J Neurosurg Spine 96(3):309–312CrossRef Sarzier JS, Evans AJ, Cahill DW (2002) Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines. J Neurosurg Spine 96(3):309–312CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tomita S, Molloy Sean M, Jasper L, Abe M, Belkoff S (2004) Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements. Spine 29(11):1203–1207CrossRefPubMed Tomita S, Molloy Sean M, Jasper L, Abe M, Belkoff S (2004) Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements. Spine 29(11):1203–1207CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference World Health Organisation Technical report (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis, series 843 World Health Organisation Technical report (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis, series 843
Metadata
Title
Stability of anterior vertebral body screws after kyphoplasty augmentation
An experimental study to compare anterior vertebral body screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement
Authors
O. Linhardt
C. Lüring
J. Matussek
C. Hamberger
T. Herold
W. Plitz
J. Grifka
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2006
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0100-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2006

International Orthopaedics 5/2006 Go to the issue