Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 4/2024

Open Access 08-05-2024 | ß-Blockers | CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Prospective benchmarking of an observational analysis in the SWEDEHEART registry against the REDUCE-AMI randomized trial

Authors: Anthony A. Matthews, Issa J. Dahebreh, Conor J. MacDonald, Bertil Lindahl, Robin Hofmann, David Erlinge, Troels Yndigegn, Anita Berglund, Tomas Jernberg, Miguel A. Hernán

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 4/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Prospective benchmarking of an observational analysis against a randomized trial increases confidence in the benchmarking process as it relies exclusively on aligning the protocol of the trial and the observational analysis, while the trials findings are unavailable. The Randomized Evaluation of Decreased Usage of Betablockers After Myocardial Infarction (REDUCE-AMI, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03278509) trial started recruitment in September 2017 and results are expected in 2024. REDUCE-AMI aimed to estimate the effect of long-term use of beta blockers on the risk of death and myocardial following a myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular systolic ejection fraction. We specified the protocol of a target trial as similar as possible to that of REDUCE-AMI, then emulated the target trial using observational data from Swedish healthcare registries. Had everyone followed the treatment strategy as specified in the target trial protocol, the observational analysis estimated a reduction in the 5-year risk of death or myocardial infarction of 0.8 percentage points for beta blockers compared with no beta blockers; effects ranging from an absolute reduction of 4.5 percentage points to an increase of 2.8 percentage points in the risk of death or myocardial infarction were compatible with our data under conventional statistical criteria. Once results of REDUCE-AMI are published, we will compare the results of our observational analysis against those from the trial. If this prospective benchmarking is successful, it supports the credibility of additional analyses using these observational data, which can rapidly deliver answers to questions that could not be answered by the initial trial. If benchmarking proves unsuccessful, we will conduct a “postmortem” analysis to identify the reasons for the discrepancy. Prospective benchmarking shifts the investigator focus away from an endeavour to use observational data to obtain similar results as a completed randomized trial, to a systematic attempt to align the design and analysis of the trial and the observational analysis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dahabreh IJ, Robins JM, Hernán MA. Benchmarking observational methods by comparing randomized trials and their emulations. Epidemiology. 2020;31:614–9.CrossRefPubMed Dahabreh IJ, Robins JM, Hernán MA. Benchmarking observational methods by comparing randomized trials and their emulations. Epidemiology. 2020;31:614–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Matthews AA, Dahabreh IJ, Fröbert O, et al. Benchmarking observational analyses before using them to address questions trials do not answer: an application to coronary thrombus aspiration. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;2:kwac098. Matthews AA, Dahabreh IJ, Fröbert O, et al. Benchmarking observational analyses before using them to address questions trials do not answer: an application to coronary thrombus aspiration. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;2:kwac098.
3.
go back to reference Matthews AA, Szummer K, Dahabreh IJ, et al. Comparing effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies from the same population: an application to percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10: e020357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matthews AA, Szummer K, Dahabreh IJ, et al. Comparing effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies from the same population: an application to percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10: e020357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Lodi S, Phillips A, Lundgren J, et al. Effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies: comparing apples with apples. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188:1569–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lodi S, Phillips A, Lundgren J, et al. Effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies: comparing apples with apples. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188:1569–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Garcia-Albeniz X, Chan JM, Paciorek A, et al. Immediate versus deferred initiation of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients with PSA-only relapse. An observational follow-up study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:817–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Garcia-Albeniz X, Chan JM, Paciorek A, et al. Immediate versus deferred initiation of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients with PSA-only relapse. An observational follow-up study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:817–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer among medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 79 years. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:18–26.CrossRefPubMed García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer among medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 79 years. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:18–26.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gupta S, Wang W, Hayek SS, et al. Association between early treatment with tocilizumab and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:41–51.CrossRefPubMed Gupta S, Wang W, Hayek SS, et al. Association between early treatment with tocilizumab and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:41–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yndigegn T, Lindahl B, Alfredsson J, et al. Design and rationale of randomized evaluation of decreased usage of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (REDUCE-AMI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023;9:192–7.CrossRefPubMed Yndigegn T, Lindahl B, Alfredsson J, et al. Design and rationale of randomized evaluation of decreased usage of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (REDUCE-AMI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023;9:192–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jernberg T, Attebring MF, Hambraeus K, et al. The Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART). Heart. 2010;96:1617–21.CrossRefPubMed Jernberg T, Attebring MF, Hambraeus K, et al. The Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART). Heart. 2010;96:1617–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Hernán MA, Wang W, Leaf DE. Target trial emulation: a framework for causal inference from observational data. JAMA. 2022;328:2446–7.CrossRefPubMed Hernán MA, Wang W, Leaf DE. Target trial emulation: a framework for causal inference from observational data. JAMA. 2022;328:2446–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hansford HJ, Cashin AG, Jones MD, et al. Reporting of observational studies explicitly aiming to emulate randomized trials: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6: e2336023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hansford HJ, Cashin AG, Jones MD, et al. Reporting of observational studies explicitly aiming to emulate randomized trials: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6: e2336023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Thompson WA. On the treatment of grouped observations in life studies. Biometrics. 1977;33:463–70.CrossRefPubMed Thompson WA. On the treatment of grouped observations in life studies. Biometrics. 1977;33:463–70.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hernan MA, Robins JM. Causal inference: what if. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2020. Hernan MA, Robins JM. Causal inference: what if. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2020.
16.
go back to reference Young JG, Stensrud MJ, Tchetgen EJT, et al. A causal framework for classical statistical estimands in failure-time settings with competing events. Stat Med. 2020;39:1199–236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Young JG, Stensrud MJ, Tchetgen EJT, et al. A causal framework for classical statistical estimands in failure-time settings with competing events. Stat Med. 2020;39:1199–236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ludvigsson JF, Almqvist C, Bonamy A-KE, et al. Registers of the Swedish total population and their use in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:125–36.CrossRefPubMed Ludvigsson JF, Almqvist C, Bonamy A-KE, et al. Registers of the Swedish total population and their use in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:125–36.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wettermark B, Hammar N, MichaelFored C, et al. The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register—opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:726–35.CrossRefPubMed Wettermark B, Hammar N, MichaelFored C, et al. The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register—opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:726–35.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cain LE, Robins JM, Lanoy E, et al. When to start treatment? A systematic approach to the comparison of dynamic regimes using observational data. Int J Biostat. 2010;6:Article 18. Cain LE, Robins JM, Lanoy E, et al. When to start treatment? A systematic approach to the comparison of dynamic regimes using observational data. Int J Biostat. 2010;6:Article 18.
22.
go back to reference Emilsson L, García-Albéniz X, Logan RW, et al. Examining bias in studies of statin treatment and survival in patients with cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:63–70.CrossRefPubMed Emilsson L, García-Albéniz X, Logan RW, et al. Examining bias in studies of statin treatment and survival in patients with cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:63–70.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” The Lancet. 2005;365:82–93.CrossRef Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” The Lancet. 2005;365:82–93.CrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Hernán MA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2010;21:13–5.CrossRef Hernán MA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2010;21:13–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prospective benchmarking of an observational analysis in the SWEDEHEART registry against the REDUCE-AMI randomized trial
Authors
Anthony A. Matthews
Issa J. Dahebreh
Conor J. MacDonald
Bertil Lindahl
Robin Hofmann
David Erlinge
Troels Yndigegn
Anita Berglund
Tomas Jernberg
Miguel A. Hernán
Publication date
08-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01119-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2024

European Journal of Epidemiology 4/2024 Go to the issue