Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

“SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)

Authors: Megan B. Sands, Swapnil Sharma, Lindsay Carpenter, Andrew Hartshorn, Jessica T. Lee, Sanja Lujic, Megan E. Congdon, Angus M. Buchanan, Meera Agar, Janette L. Vardy

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

A serious syndrome for cancer in-patients, delirium risk increases with age and medical acuity. Screening tools exist but detection is frequently delayed or missed. We test the ‘Single Question in Delirium’ (SQiD), in comparison to psychiatrist clinical interview.

Methods

Inpatients in two comprehensive cancer centres were prospectively screened. Clinical staff asked informants to respond to the SQiD: “Do you feel that [patient’s name] has been more confused lately?”. The primary endpoint was negative predictive value (NPV) of the SQiD versus psychiatrist diagnosis (Diagnostic and Statistics Manual criteria). Secondary endpoints included: NPV of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient.

Results

Between May 2012 and July 2015, the SQiD plus CAM was applied to 122 patients; 73 had the SQiD and psychiatrist interview. Median age was 65 yrs. (interquartile range 54–74), 46% were female; median length of hospital stay was 12 days (5–18 days). Major cancer types were lung (19%), gastric or other upper GI (15%) and breast (14%). 70% of participants had stage 4 cancer. Diagnostic values were similar between the SQiD (NPV = 74, 95% CI 67–81; kappa = 0.32) and CAM (NPV = 72, 95% CI 67–77, kappa = 0.32), compared with psychiatrist interview. Overall the CAM identified only a small number of delirious cases but all were true positives. The specificity of the SQiD was 87% (74–95) The SQiD had higher sensitivity than CAM (44% [95% CI 41–80] vs 26% [10–48]).

Conclusion

The SQiD, administered by bedside clinical staff, was feasible and its psychometric properties are now better understood. The SQiD can contribute to delirium detection and clinical care for hospitalised cancer patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The European Delirium Association and The American Delirium Society. The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer. BMC Med. 2014;12:141.CrossRef The European Delirium Association and The American Delirium Society. The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer. BMC Med. 2014;12:141.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, et al. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:669–76.CrossRef Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, et al. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:669–76.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Neufeld KJ, Nelliot A, Inouye SK, et al. Delirium diagnosis methodology used in research: a survey-based study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22:1513–21.CrossRef Neufeld KJ, Nelliot A, Inouye SK, et al. Delirium diagnosis methodology used in research: a survey-based study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22:1513–21.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference De J, Wand AP. Delirium screening: a systematic review of delirium screening tools in hospitalized patients. Gerontologist. 2015;55:1079–99.CrossRef De J, Wand AP. Delirium screening: a systematic review of delirium screening tools in hospitalized patients. Gerontologist. 2015;55:1079–99.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Simel DL, et al. Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments. JAMA. 2010;304:779–86.CrossRef Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Simel DL, et al. Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments. JAMA. 2010;304:779–86.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ryan K, Leonard M, Guerin S, et al. Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting. Palliat Med. 2009;23:40–5.CrossRef Ryan K, Leonard M, Guerin S, et al. Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting. Palliat Med. 2009;23:40–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gaudreau JD, Gagnon P, Harel F, et al. Fast, systematic, and continuous delirium assessment in hospitalized patients: the nursing delirium screening scale. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2005;29:368–75.CrossRef Gaudreau JD, Gagnon P, Harel F, et al. Fast, systematic, and continuous delirium assessment in hospitalized patients: the nursing delirium screening scale. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2005;29:368–75.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baird L, Spiller JA. A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or short CAM? BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6:e000153.CrossRef Baird L, Spiller JA. A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or short CAM? BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6:e000153.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Neefjes EC, Van Der Vorst MJ, Boddaert MS, et al. Accuracy of the delirium observational screening scale (DOS) as a screening tool for delirium in patients with advanced cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:1–7.CrossRef Neefjes EC, Van Der Vorst MJ, Boddaert MS, et al. Accuracy of the delirium observational screening scale (DOS) as a screening tool for delirium in patients with advanced cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:1–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, et al. The confusion assessment method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:823–30.CrossRef Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, et al. The confusion assessment method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:823–30.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scanlan J, Borson S. The mini-cog: receiver operating characteristics with expert and naive raters. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16:216–22.CrossRef Scanlan J, Borson S. The mini-cog: receiver operating characteristics with expert and naive raters. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16:216–22.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Adamis D, Meagher D, Murray O, et al. Evaluating attention in delirium: a comparison of bedside tests of attention. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16:1028–35.CrossRef Adamis D, Meagher D, Murray O, et al. Evaluating attention in delirium: a comparison of bedside tests of attention. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16:1028–35.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rohatgi N, Weng Y, Bentley J, et al. Initiative for prevention and early identification of delirium in medical-surgical units: lessons learned in the past five years. Am J Med. 2019;132:1421–30 e8.CrossRef Rohatgi N, Weng Y, Bentley J, et al. Initiative for prevention and early identification of delirium in medical-surgical units: lessons learned in the past five years. Am J Med. 2019;132:1421–30 e8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shenkin SD, Fox C, Godfrey M, et al. Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method. BMC Med. 2019;17:138.CrossRef Shenkin SD, Fox C, Godfrey M, et al. Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method. BMC Med. 2019;17:138.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sands MB, Dantoc BP, Hartshorn A, et al. Single question in delirium (SQiD): testing its efficacy against psychiatrist interview, the confusion assessment method and the memorial delirium assessment scale. Palliat Med. 2010;24:561–5.CrossRef Sands MB, Dantoc BP, Hartshorn A, et al. Single question in delirium (SQiD): testing its efficacy against psychiatrist interview, the confusion assessment method and the memorial delirium assessment scale. Palliat Med. 2010;24:561–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Inouye SK. The short confusion assessment method (short CAM)_Training manual and coding guide. Boston: Hospital Elder Life. Program. 2014. Inouye SK. The short confusion assessment method (short CAM)_Training manual and coding guide. Boston: Hospital Elder Life. Program. 2014.
19.
go back to reference Castillo RJ, Sattler, D., Shabatay, V., Kramer, G., & American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). 2000. Castillo RJ, Sattler, D., Shabatay, V., Kramer, G., & American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). 2000.
20.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®), American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®), American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Meagher D, Trzepacz P. Motoric subtypes of delirium, Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry; 2000. p. 75–85. Meagher D, Trzepacz P. Motoric subtypes of delirium, Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry; 2000. p. 75–85.
22.
go back to reference Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308:1552.CrossRef Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308:1552.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions., The measurement of interrater agreement; 1981. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions., The measurement of interrater agreement; 1981.
24.
go back to reference Ryan DJ, O'Regan NA, Caoimh RÓ, et al. Delirium in an adult acute hospital population: predictors, prevalence and detection. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001772.CrossRef Ryan DJ, O'Regan NA, Caoimh RÓ, et al. Delirium in an adult acute hospital population: predictors, prevalence and detection. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001772.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bush SH, Lawlor PG, Ryan K, et al. Delirium in adult cancer patients: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv143–65.CrossRef Bush SH, Lawlor PG, Ryan K, et al. Delirium in adult cancer patients: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv143–65.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ljubisavljevic V, Kelly B. Risk factors for development of delirium among oncology patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25:345–52.CrossRef Ljubisavljevic V, Kelly B. Risk factors for development of delirium among oncology patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25:345–52.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gaudreau JD, Gagnon P, Harel F, et al. Psychoactive medications and risk of delirium in hospitalized cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6712–8.CrossRef Gaudreau JD, Gagnon P, Harel F, et al. Psychoactive medications and risk of delirium in hospitalized cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6712–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bellelli G, Morandi A, Di Santo SG, et al. "delirium day": a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool. BMC Med. 2016;14:106.CrossRef Bellelli G, Morandi A, Di Santo SG, et al. "delirium day": a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool. BMC Med. 2016;14:106.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bellelli G, Morandi A, Davis DH, et al. Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people. Age Ageing. 2014;43:496–502.CrossRef Bellelli G, Morandi A, Davis DH, et al. Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people. Age Ageing. 2014;43:496–502.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Voyer P, Champoux N, Desrosiers J, et al. Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study. BMC Nurs. 2015;14:19.CrossRef Voyer P, Champoux N, Desrosiers J, et al. Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study. BMC Nurs. 2015;14:19.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
“SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
Authors
Megan B. Sands
Swapnil Sharma
Lindsay Carpenter
Andrew Hartshorn
Jessica T. Lee
Sanja Lujic
Megan E. Congdon
Angus M. Buchanan
Meera Agar
Janette L. Vardy
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cancer 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine