Issue Special Issue 2/2000
Symposium Mammographicum 2000
Content (69 Articles)
The Swedish Two-County Trial 20-years on: updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up
L Tabár, SW Duffy, B Viták, H-H Chen, UB Krusemo
Electrical impedance imaging of the breast (TranScan TS 2000): initial UK experience
SJ Barter, IP Hicks
Pre-operative diagnosis and staging of symptomatic breast disease using 99mtechnitium scintimammography
I Bradford, A Mackie, E McCauley, P Cadigan, A Cook
Preliminary results of a pilot study into the diagnostic value of T scan in detecting breast malignancies
RL Tetlow, AE Hubbard
The evaluation of four small-field digital mammography systems
CP Lawinski, D Smith, DS Evans, A Mackenzie, NSA Wells, D Emerton, CA Lewis
A comparative evaluation of two full-field digital mammography units
D Smith, CP Lawinski, A Mackenzie, DS Evans, NSA Wells, D Emerton, CA Lewis
Preoperative detection of multicentric breast cancer using tetrafosmin mammoscintigraphy
S Varkey, MJ Smith, PJ Cant
A comparison of prone breast biopsy procedures using a digital imaging system with a conventional upright technique
Z Vegnuti, M Whall
Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme
J Cawson, AF Amos, AM Kavanagh
Extending routine invitation to breast screening to the 65-69 year age group: report of the Scottish pilot study
HM Dobson, J McMenemin, J Cairns
How do radiographers compare to radiologists when double reading screening mammograms
J Inglis, J Curtis, C Eve, G Wivell, E Denton, G Hurst
Stages of screen-detected breast cancer
K Koufopoulos, I Garas, Ch Pateras, E Ampatzoglou, P Kakavoulis, A Michas, S Gravas, V Sarrou, D Tsitsimelis, M Tsompanlioti, N Papageorgiou, K Kapridaki, F De Waard
The early impact of the breast cancer screening programme in the city of Florence: methods of evaluation and first results (1990-1996)
E Paci, D Giorgi, M Zappa, C Seghieri, M Rosselli del Turco
The long term follow up of a cohort of women invited to NHS breast screening
A ThrelfalI, C Woodman
Can radiographers reliably read screening mammograms?
G Wivell, I Harvey, J Curtin, E Denton
Sclerosing lymphocytic lobulitis (SLL): a diagnostic challenge
S Dutta, L Campbell, RM Watkins, C Teasdale, DM Lee, PA Jones
Breast ultrasound in a "moderate risk" population
D O'Driscoll, R Warren, J MacKay, P Britton, NE Day
Does preoperative diagnosis reduce the number of operations required for treatment of screen-detected breast cancer?
G Ralleigh, M Michell, S Henderson, S Bose
The technical aspects of adapting add-on digital stereotactic equipment for use with patient lying horizontally
G Rubin, R Evans, A Page
Characterising breast tissue for the development of a tissue-equivalent phantom
MJ Farquharson
Implanted markers prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary report
DM Allan for the Dartford Breast Care Team
Techniques and equipment in mammography - an aid to diagnosis
J Berry-Smith, L Gustard
Between four walls: what level of privacy do women want?
M Brown, B Caswell, M Heath
Galactocele in a postmenopausal woman: a case report
PK Dave, SB Bhaduri, S Gupta, R Nichlani, B Sanyal
Audit rules OK! The benefits of an internal quality audit programme in the breast screening service
S Munslow, MG Wallis
What is the predictive value for malignancy of radiological classification for indeterminate microcalcification seen on mammography?
G Ralleigh, E Sanderson, GA Berjawi, MJ Michell, S Bose, S Henderson
Investigation into possible causes of blurring in mammograms
D Seddon, KA Schofield, CA Waite
Radial scars and stellate lesions as imaging abnormalities: a comparative study
A Stewart
Quality management systems: the benefits of achieving ISO 9002
M Wheaton, S Munslow, MG Wallis
Responsibility versus residence: how will this change in Department of Health policy affect you and your breast screening service?
M Wheaton, MG Wallis