Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Splenectomy

A novel preoperative scoring system to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases

Authors: Peng Liu, You Li, Hong-Fan Ding, Ding-Hui Dong, Xu-Feng Zhang, Xue-Min Liu, Yi Lv, Jun-Xi Xiang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has been proven to be a safe and advantageous procedure. To ensure that resections of appropriate difficulty are selected, an objective preoperative grading of difficulty is required. We aimed to develop a predictive difficulty grading of LS based on intraoperative complications.

Methods

A total of 272 non-traumatic patients who underwent LS were identified from a regional medical center. Patients were randomized into a training cohort (n = 222) and a validation cohort (n = 50). Data on demographics, medical and surgical history, operative and pathological characteristics, and postoperative outcome details were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for intraoperative complications were performed to develop a difficulty scoring system. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the difficulty grading score and intraoperative outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discriminatory power of this scoring system.

Results

Three preoperative factors (spleen weight, esophagogastric varices, and INR) had a significant effect on operative time, bleeding, and conversion to open surgery. We created a difficulty grading score with three levels of difficulty: low (≤ 4 points), medium (5–6 points), and high (≥ 7 points), based on the three preoperative parameters. The correlation was highly significant (P < 0.01) according to Spearman’s correlation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.695 (95% CI 0.630–0.755). The external validation showed significant correlations with the present model, with an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI 0.580–0.842). The comparison between our difficulty score and the previous grading system in the 272-patient cohort presented a significant difference in the AUC (0.701, 95% CI 0.643–0.755 vs. 0.644, 95% CI 0.584–0.701, P = 0.0452).

Conclusion

The present difficulty scoring system, based on preoperative factors, has good performance in predicting the risk of intraoperative complications of LS and could be helpful for enabling appropriate case selection with respect to the current experience of a surgeon.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Delaitre B, Maignien B (1991) Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case. Presse Medicale (Paris, France : 1983) 20:2263 Delaitre B, Maignien B (1991) Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case. Presse Medicale (Paris, France : 1983) 20:2263
2.
go back to reference Fisichella PM, Wong YM, Pappas SG, Abood GJ (2014) Laparoscopic splenectomy: perioperative management, surgical technique, and results. J Gastrointest Surg 18:404–410CrossRef Fisichella PM, Wong YM, Pappas SG, Abood GJ (2014) Laparoscopic splenectomy: perioperative management, surgical technique, and results. J Gastrointest Surg 18:404–410CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Al-raimi K, Zheng SS (2016) Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int : HBPD INT 15:14–20CrossRef Al-raimi K, Zheng SS (2016) Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int : HBPD INT 15:14–20CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Radkowiak D, Zychowicz A, Lasek A, Wysocki M, Major P, Pedziwiatr M, Budzynski P, Kulawik J, Budzynski A (2018) 20 years' experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. Single center outcomes of a cohort study of 500 cases. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 52:285–292CrossRef Radkowiak D, Zychowicz A, Lasek A, Wysocki M, Major P, Pedziwiatr M, Budzynski P, Kulawik J, Budzynski A (2018) 20 years' experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. Single center outcomes of a cohort study of 500 cases. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 52:285–292CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Habermalz B, Sauerland S, Decker G, Delaitre B, Gigot JF, Leandros E, Lechner K, Rhodes M, Silecchia G, Szold A, Targarona E, Torelli P, Neugebauer E (2008) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 22:821–848CrossRef Habermalz B, Sauerland S, Decker G, Delaitre B, Gigot JF, Leandros E, Lechner K, Rhodes M, Silecchia G, Szold A, Targarona E, Torelli P, Neugebauer E (2008) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 22:821–848CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matharoo GS, Afthinos JN, Gibbs KE (2014) Trends in splenectomy: where does laparoscopy stand? JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(4):e2014CrossRef Matharoo GS, Afthinos JN, Gibbs KE (2014) Trends in splenectomy: where does laparoscopy stand? JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(4):e2014CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shin RD, Lis R, Levergood NR, Brooks DC, Shoji BT, Tavakkoli A (2019) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear. Surg Endosc 33:1298–1303CrossRef Shin RD, Lis R, Levergood NR, Brooks DC, Shoji BT, Tavakkoli A (2019) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear. Surg Endosc 33:1298–1303CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Casaccia M, Torelli P, Pasa A, Sormani MP, Rossi E (2010) Putative predictive parameters for the outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy: a multicenter analysis performed on the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Surgery of the Spleen. Ann Surg 251:287–291CrossRef Casaccia M, Torelli P, Pasa A, Sormani MP, Rossi E (2010) Putative predictive parameters for the outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy: a multicenter analysis performed on the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Surgery of the Spleen. Ann Surg 251:287–291CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Otero Luppi C, Targarona Soler EM, Balague Ponz C, Pantoja Millan JP, Turrado Rodriguez V, Pallares Segura JL, Bollo Rodriguez J, Trias Folch M (2017) Clinical, anatomical, and pathological grading score to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases. World J Surg 41:439–448CrossRef Rodriguez-Otero Luppi C, Targarona Soler EM, Balague Ponz C, Pantoja Millan JP, Turrado Rodriguez V, Pallares Segura JL, Bollo Rodriguez J, Trias Folch M (2017) Clinical, anatomical, and pathological grading score to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases. World J Surg 41:439–448CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yu H, Guo S, Wang L, Dong Y, Tian G, Mu S, Zhang H, Li D, Zhao S (2016) Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive operation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 26:524–530CrossRef Yu H, Guo S, Wang L, Dong Y, Tian G, Mu S, Zhang H, Li D, Zhao S (2016) Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive operation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 26:524–530CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kluhs L, Teichgraber UK, Schneider U, Ludwig WD, Dorken B, Benter T (2003) Accuracy of the sonographic determination of the splenic weight in comparison with the weight at autopsy. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 175:532–535CrossRef Kluhs L, Teichgraber UK, Schneider U, Ludwig WD, Dorken B, Benter T (2003) Accuracy of the sonographic determination of the splenic weight in comparison with the weight at autopsy. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 175:532–535CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang Y, Zhan X, Zhu Y, Xie Z, Zhu J, Ye Z (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy in portal hypertension: a single-surgeon 13-year experience. Surg Endosc 24:1164–1169CrossRef Wang Y, Zhan X, Zhu Y, Xie Z, Zhu J, Ye Z (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy in portal hypertension: a single-surgeon 13-year experience. Surg Endosc 24:1164–1169CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Utria AF, Goffredo P, Keck K, Shelton JS, Shilyansky J, Hassan I (2019) Laparoscopic splenectomy: has it become the standard surgical approach in pediatric patients? J Surg Res 240:109–114CrossRef Utria AF, Goffredo P, Keck K, Shelton JS, Shilyansky J, Hassan I (2019) Laparoscopic splenectomy: has it become the standard surgical approach in pediatric patients? J Surg Res 240:109–114CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Misiakos EP, Bagias G, Liakakos T, Machairas A (2017) Laparoscopic splenectomy: current concepts. World J Gastrointest Endosc 9:428–437CrossRef Misiakos EP, Bagias G, Liakakos T, Machairas A (2017) Laparoscopic splenectomy: current concepts. World J Gastrointest Endosc 9:428–437CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Al-Mulhim AS (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly in benign hematological diseases. Surg Endosc 26:3186–3189CrossRef Al-Mulhim AS (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly in benign hematological diseases. Surg Endosc 26:3186–3189CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Kinjo N, Harimoto N, Itoh S, Tsutsumi N, Matsumoto Y, Yoshizumi T, Shirabe K, Maehara Y (2015) Laparoscopic splenectomy with technical standardization and selection criteria for standard or hand-assisted approach in 390 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Am Coll Surg 221:354–366CrossRef Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Kinjo N, Harimoto N, Itoh S, Tsutsumi N, Matsumoto Y, Yoshizumi T, Shirabe K, Maehara Y (2015) Laparoscopic splenectomy with technical standardization and selection criteria for standard or hand-assisted approach in 390 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Am Coll Surg 221:354–366CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhu JH, Wang YD, Ye ZY, Zhao T, Zhu YW, Xie ZJ, Liu JM (2009) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 19:258–262CrossRef Zhu JH, Wang YD, Ye ZY, Zhao T, Zhu YW, Xie ZJ, Liu JM (2009) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 19:258–262CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Marte G, Scuderi V, Rocca A, Surfaro G, Migliaccio C, Ceriello A (2013) Laparoscopic splenectomy: a single center experience Unusual cases and expanded inclusion criteria for laparoscopic approach. Updates Surg 65:115–119CrossRef Marte G, Scuderi V, Rocca A, Surfaro G, Migliaccio C, Ceriello A (2013) Laparoscopic splenectomy: a single center experience Unusual cases and expanded inclusion criteria for laparoscopic approach. Updates Surg 65:115–119CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Sansonna F, Scandroglio I, Maggioni D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Costanzi A, Grillo G, Cimbanassi S, Chiara O (2006) Laparoscopic splenectomy: a retrospective review of 75 cases. Int Surg 91:82–86 Pugliese R, Sansonna F, Scandroglio I, Maggioni D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Costanzi A, Grillo G, Cimbanassi S, Chiara O (2006) Laparoscopic splenectomy: a retrospective review of 75 cases. Int Surg 91:82–86
21.
go back to reference Koshenkov VP, Nemeth ZH, Carter MS (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcome and efficacy for massive and supramassive spleens. Am J Surg 203:517–522CrossRef Koshenkov VP, Nemeth ZH, Carter MS (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcome and efficacy for massive and supramassive spleens. Am J Surg 203:517–522CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zheng X, Liu Q, Yao Y (2013) Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization is a safe, effective, minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding. Surg Innov 20:32–39CrossRef Zheng X, Liu Q, Yao Y (2013) Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization is a safe, effective, minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding. Surg Innov 20:32–39CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Goncalves D, Morais M, Costa-Pinho A, Bessa-Melo R, Graca L, Costa-Maia J (2018) Validation of a difficulty grading score in laparoscopic splenectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn Part A 28:242–247CrossRef Goncalves D, Morais M, Costa-Pinho A, Bessa-Melo R, Graca L, Costa-Maia J (2018) Validation of a difficulty grading score in laparoscopic splenectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn Part A 28:242–247CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Peters MB Jr, Camacho D, Ojeda H, Reichenbach DJ, Knauer EM, Yahanda AM, Cooper SE, Sweeney JF (2004) Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Am J Surg 188:522–525CrossRef Peters MB Jr, Camacho D, Ojeda H, Reichenbach DJ, Knauer EM, Yahanda AM, Cooper SE, Sweeney JF (2004) Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Am J Surg 188:522–525CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fraser SA, Bergman S, Garzon J (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy: learning curve comparison between benign and malignant disease. Surg Innov 19:27–32CrossRef Fraser SA, Bergman S, Garzon J (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy: learning curve comparison between benign and malignant disease. Surg Innov 19:27–32CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel preoperative scoring system to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases
Authors
Peng Liu
You Li
Hong-Fan Ding
Ding-Hui Dong
Xu-Feng Zhang
Xue-Min Liu
Yi Lv
Jun-Xi Xiang
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07327-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2020 Go to the issue