Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Spine surgeon’s kinematics during discectomy, part II: Operating table height and visualization methods, including microscope

Authors: Jeong Yoon Park, Kyung Hyun Kim, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Surgeon spine angle during surgery was studied ergonomically and the kinematics of the surgeon’s spine was related with musculoskeletal fatigue and pain. Spine angles varied depending on operation table height and visualization method, and in a previous paper we showed that the use of a loupe and a table height at the midpoint between the umbilicus and the sternum are optimal for reducing musculoskeletal loading. However, no studies have previously included a microscope as a possible visualization method. The objective of this study is to assess differences in surgeon spine angles depending on operating table height and visualization method, including microscope.

Materials and methods

We enrolled 18 experienced spine surgeons for this study, who each performed a discectomy using a spine surgery simulator. Three different methods were used to visualize the surgical field (naked eye, loupe, microscope) and three different operating table heights (anterior superior iliac spine, umbilicus, the midpoint between the umbilicus and the sternum) were studied. Whole spine angles were compared for three different views during the discectomy simulation: midline, ipsilateral, and contralateral. A 16-camera optoelectronic motion analysis system was used, and 16 markers were placed from the head to the pelvis. Lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, cervical lordosis, and occipital angle were compared between the different operating table heights and visualization methods as well as a natural standing position.

Results

Whole spine angles differed significantly depending on visualization method. All parameters were closer to natural standing values when discectomy was performed with a microscope, and there were no differences between the naked eye and the loupe. Whole spine angles were also found to differ from the natural standing position depending on operating table height, and became closer to natural standing position values as the operating table height increased, independent of the visualization method. When using a microscope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and cervical lordosis showed no differences according to table heights above the umbilicus.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the use of a microscope and a table height above the umbilicus are optimal for reducing surgeon musculoskeletal fatigue.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wunderlich M, Jacob R, Stelzig Y, Rüther T, Leyk D (2010) Analysis of spinal stress during surgery in otolaryngology. HNO 58:791–798PubMedCrossRef Wunderlich M, Jacob R, Stelzig Y, Rüther T, Leyk D (2010) Analysis of spinal stress during surgery in otolaryngology. HNO 58:791–798PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Park JY, Kim KH, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Cho YE (2012) Spine surgeon’s kinematics during discectomy according to operating table height and the methods to visualize the surgical field. Eur Spine J 21:2704–2712PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Park JY, Kim KH, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Cho YE (2012) Spine surgeon’s kinematics during discectomy according to operating table height and the methods to visualize the surgical field. Eur Spine J 21:2704–2712PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Tott ER, Pierie JP (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285PubMedCrossRef van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Tott ER, Pierie JP (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kant IJ, de Jong LC, van Rijssen-Moll M, Borm PJ (1992) A survey of static and dynamic work postures of operating room staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63:423–428PubMedCrossRef Kant IJ, de Jong LC, van Rijssen-Moll M, Borm PJ (1992) A survey of static and dynamic work postures of operating room staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63:423–428PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shirzadi A, Mukherjee D, Drazin DG, Paff M, Perri B, Mamelak AN, Siddique K (2012) Use of the video telescope operating monitor (VITOM) as an alternative to the operating microscope in spine surgery. Spine 37:1517–1523CrossRef Shirzadi A, Mukherjee D, Drazin DG, Paff M, Perri B, Mamelak AN, Siddique K (2012) Use of the video telescope operating monitor (VITOM) as an alternative to the operating microscope in spine surgery. Spine 37:1517–1523CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Postacchini F, Postacchini R (2011) Operative management of lumbar disc herniation: the evolution of knowledge and surgical techniques in the last century. Acta Neurochir Suppl 108:17–21PubMedCrossRef Postacchini F, Postacchini R (2011) Operative management of lumbar disc herniation: the evolution of knowledge and surgical techniques in the last century. Acta Neurochir Suppl 108:17–21PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kranenburg Gossot (2004) Ergonomic problems encountered during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 13:147–155PubMedCrossRef Kranenburg Gossot (2004) Ergonomic problems encountered during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 13:147–155PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Godinez C, Meenaghan N, Catania R, Park A (2009) Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 23:182–188PubMedCrossRef Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Godinez C, Meenaghan N, Catania R, Park A (2009) Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 23:182–188PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mirbod SM, Yoshida H, Miyamoto K, Miyashita K, Inaba R, Iwata H (1995) Subjective complaints in orthopedists and general surgeons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67:179–186PubMed Mirbod SM, Yoshida H, Miyamoto K, Miyashita K, Inaba R, Iwata H (1995) Subjective complaints in orthopedists and general surgeons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67:179–186PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cenic A, Kachur E (2009) Lumbar discectomy: a national survey of neurosurgeons and literature review. Can J Neurol Sci 36:196–200PubMed Cenic A, Kachur E (2009) Lumbar discectomy: a national survey of neurosurgeons and literature review. Can J Neurol Sci 36:196–200PubMed
11.
go back to reference Branson BG, Bray KK, Gadbury Amyot C, Holt LA, Keselyak NT, Mitchell TV, Williams KB (2004) Effect of magnification lenses on student operator posture. J Dent Educ 68:384–389PubMed Branson BG, Bray KK, Gadbury Amyot C, Holt LA, Keselyak NT, Mitchell TV, Williams KB (2004) Effect of magnification lenses on student operator posture. J Dent Educ 68:384–389PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mamoun JS (2009) A rationale for the use of high-powered magnification or microscopes in general dentistry. Gen Dent 57:18–26PubMed Mamoun JS (2009) A rationale for the use of high-powered magnification or microscopes in general dentistry. Gen Dent 57:18–26PubMed
13.
go back to reference Maggio MP, Villegas H, Blatz MB (2011) The effect of magnification loupes on the performance of preclinical dental students. Quintessence Int 42:45–55PubMed Maggio MP, Villegas H, Blatz MB (2011) The effect of magnification loupes on the performance of preclinical dental students. Quintessence Int 42:45–55PubMed
14.
go back to reference Chang BJ (2002) Ergonomic benefits of surgical telescope systems: selection guidelines. J Calif Dent Assoc 30:161–169PubMed Chang BJ (2002) Ergonomic benefits of surgical telescope systems: selection guidelines. J Calif Dent Assoc 30:161–169PubMed
15.
go back to reference Berquer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:416–421PubMedCrossRef Berquer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:416–421PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RH, Meijer DW (2002) Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:47–52PubMedCrossRef van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RH, Meijer DW (2002) Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:47–52PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Spine surgeon’s kinematics during discectomy, part II: Operating table height and visualization methods, including microscope
Authors
Jeong Yoon Park
Kyung Hyun Kim
Sung Uk Kuh
Dong Kyu Chin
Keun Su Kim
Yong Eun Cho
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3125-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

European Spine Journal 5/2014 Go to the issue