Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2024

27-10-2023 | Spinal Surgery | Original Article

Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Ayşegül Bilge, Betül Başaran

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Major spinal surgery causes severe postoperative pain. The present randomized, controlled, prospective study tested the short- and long-term effects of thoracolumbar interfascial and erector spinae plane blocks on patient-centered outcomes for major lumbar spinal surgery.

Methods

Sixty adult patients were randomly assigned to receive either bilateral thoracolumbar interfascial plane or erector spinae plane block after anesthesia induction using bupivacaine 0.25%, 20 mL. The primary outcome of this study was the Quality of Recovery-40 score in the postoperative 24th hour. Secondary outcomes were Comprehensive Complication Index scores, postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, first rescue analgesic administration time, and complication incidence.

Results

The recovery scores of both blocks at the postoperative 24th hour were similar, with a median thoracolumbar interfascial plane block of 178 (IQR 173–180) and an erector spinae plane block of 175 (IQR 168.7–182) (p = 0.717). Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block reduced area under the curve pain with movement over 24 h compared with erector spinae plane block (p = 0.024). The pain scores between the groups were similar at all time points (p > 0.05), except the 24th hour with movement in the thoracolumbar interfascial plane block compared with the erector spinae plane block [median 3 (IQR 2–4)] vs. 4 (IQR 3–5), respectively] (p = 0.019). No differences were recorded between the block groups regarding postoperative 24th-h oxycodone consumption, time to first opioid intake, and complication incidence (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Both blocks resulted in similar quality of recovery in the postoperative 24-h period in major spinal surgery and were effective in terms of analgesia.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Finnerty D, Ní Eochagáin A, Ahmed M, Poynton A, Butler JS, Buggy DJ (2021) A randomised trial of bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. no block for thoracolumbar decompressive spinal surgery. Anaesthesia 76(11):1499–1503. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15488 Finnerty D, Ní Eochagáin A, Ahmed M, Poynton A, Butler JS, Buggy DJ (2021) A randomised trial of bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. no block for thoracolumbar decompressive spinal surgery. Anaesthesia 76(11):1499–1503. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​anae.​15488
29.
go back to reference Hu Z, Han J, Jiao B et al (2021) Efficacy of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Pain Physician 24(7):E1085–E1097PubMed Hu Z, Han J, Jiao B et al (2021) Efficacy of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Pain Physician 24(7):E1085–E1097PubMed
Metadata
Title
Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Ayşegül Bilge
Betül Başaran
Publication date
27-10-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07998-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

European Spine Journal 1/2024 Go to the issue