Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022

01-12-2022 | Spinal Stenosis | Study protocol

The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study

Authors: Shuheng Zhai, Wenkui Zhao, Bin Zhu, Xin Huang, Chen Liang, Bao Hai, Lixiang Ding, Hongwei Zhu, Xianhai Wang, Feng Wei, Hongling Chu, Xiaoguang Liu

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most frequent indications for spine surgery. Open decompression and fusion surgery was the most common treatment and used to be regarded as the golden standard treatment for LSS. In recent years, percutaneous endoscopic decompression surgery was also used for LSS. However, the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic decompression in the treatment of LSS have not been supported by high-level evidence. Our aim is to 1) compare the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression surgery and open decompression and fusion for the treatment of LSS. 2) Investigate the prognosis risk factors for LSS. 3) Evaluate the influence of percutaneous endoscopic decompression for the stability of operative level, and degeneration of adjacent level.

Methods

It’s a prospective, multicenter cohort study. The study is performed at 4 centers in Beijing. This study plans to enroll 600 LSS patients (300 patients in the percutaneous endoscopic decompression group, and 300 patients in the open decompression and fusion group). The demographic variables, healthcare variables, symptom related variables, clinical assessment (Visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA)), and radiological assessment (dynamic X-ray, CT, MRI) will be collected at baseline visit. Patients will follow up at 3, 6, 12 months. The primary outcome is the difference of improvement of ODI between baseline and 12-month follow-up between the two groups. The secondary outcome is the score changes of preoperative and postoperative VAS, the recovery rate of JOA, MacNab criteria, patient satisfaction, degeneration grade of adjacent level, ROM of operative level and adjacent level, complication rate.

Discussion

In this study, we propose to conduct a prospective registry study to address the major controversies of LSS decompression under percutaneous spinal endoscopy, and investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic decompression and open decompression in the treatment of LSS.

Trial registration

This study has been registered on clinicaltrials.​gov in January 15, 2020 (NCT04254757). (SPIRIT 2a).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818–25.CrossRef Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818–25.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016;352:h6234.CrossRef Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016;352:h6234.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259–65.CrossRef Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Du Bois M, Szpalski M, Donceel P. A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(12):2693–703.CrossRef Du Bois M, Szpalski M, Donceel P. A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(12):2693–703.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(20):E1335–51.CrossRef Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(20):E1335–51.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794–810.CrossRef Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794–810.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bae HW, Rajaee SS, Kanim LE. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(11):916–26.CrossRef Bae HW, Rajaee SS, Kanim LE. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(11):916–26.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, et al. Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):701–15.CrossRef Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, et al. Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):701–15.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peul WC, Moojen WA. Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis--Safeguard or Superfluous Surgical Implant? N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1478–9.CrossRef Peul WC, Moojen WA. Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis--Safeguard or Superfluous Surgical Implant? N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1478–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mayor S. Fusion adds little value to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis, studies show. BMJ. 2016;353:i2132.CrossRef Mayor S. Fusion adds little value to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis, studies show. BMJ. 2016;353:i2132.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413–23.CrossRef Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413–23.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Jun JH. Percutaneous endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, unilateral approach for the Lumbar Canal or lateral recess stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:e129–e37.CrossRef Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Jun JH. Percutaneous endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, unilateral approach for the Lumbar Canal or lateral recess stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:e129–e37.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee CH, Choi M, Ryu DS, et al. Efficacy and safety of full-endoscopic decompression via Interlaminar approach for central or lateral recess spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine: a Meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(24):1756–64.CrossRef Lee CH, Choi M, Ryu DS, et al. Efficacy and safety of full-endoscopic decompression via Interlaminar approach for central or lateral recess spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine: a Meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(24):1756–64.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sun F, Liang Q, Yan M, et al. Unilateral laminectomy by endoscopy in central Lumbar Canal spinal stenosis: technical note and early outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(14):E871–e77.CrossRef Sun F, Liang Q, Yan M, et al. Unilateral laminectomy by endoscopy in central Lumbar Canal spinal stenosis: technical note and early outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(14):E871–e77.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(4):1–9.CrossRef McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(4):1–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001;2(2):38–46.CrossRef Rodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001;2(2):38–46.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(11):1211–6.CrossRef Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(11):1211–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yao M, Li ZJ, Zhu S, et al. Simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic association Back pain evaluation questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with low Back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(6):E357–e64.CrossRef Yao M, Li ZJ, Zhu S, et al. Simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic association Back pain evaluation questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with low Back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(6):E357–e64.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(21):1919–24.CrossRef Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(21):1919–24.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Splettstößer A, Khan MF, Zimmermann B, et al. Correlation of lumbar lateral recess stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptoms. World J Radiol. 2017;9(5):223–9.CrossRef Splettstößer A, Khan MF, Zimmermann B, et al. Correlation of lumbar lateral recess stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptoms. World J Radiol. 2017;9(5):223–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):1095–8.CrossRef Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):1095–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873–8.CrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Choi KC, Shim HK, Park CJ, et al. Usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar Foraminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:484–92.CrossRef Choi KC, Shim HK, Park CJ, et al. Usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar Foraminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:484–92.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, et al. Endoscopic posterior decompression under local anesthesia for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(6):661–6.CrossRef Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, et al. Endoscopic posterior decompression under local anesthesia for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(6):661–6.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, et al. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology. 2007;245(1):62–77.CrossRef Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, et al. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology. 2007;245(1):62–77.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Solberg TK, Sørlie A, Sjaavik K, et al. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop. 2011;82(1):56–63.CrossRef Solberg TK, Sørlie A, Sjaavik K, et al. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop. 2011;82(1):56–63.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.CrossRef Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study
Authors
Shuheng Zhai
Wenkui Zhao
Bin Zhu
Xin Huang
Chen Liang
Bao Hai
Lixiang Ding
Hongwei Zhu
Xianhai Wang
Feng Wei
Hongling Chu
Xiaoguang Liu
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Spinal Stenosis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05440-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022 Go to the issue