Top

Child's Nervous System

Published in:

01-04-2021 | Spina Bifida | Original Article

Cognitive and motor function in adults with spina bifida myelomeningocele: a pilot study

Authors: Joan Mary Jasien, Mohamad A. Mikati, Michaela Kolarova, Brian Smith, Stephanie Thera, Pierre Lee

Published in: Child's Nervous System | Issue 4/2021

Abstract

Purpose

Determine the feasibility and utility of using a battery of tests utilized, so far, to assess neurological-cognitive functions in the typical adult population and identify the spectrum of these functions in adult SBM patients.

Methods

Prospective study in which 15 participants (mean age = 28.7 ± 8.7 years, range = 19–45 years) completed the targeted battery of tests (n = 5–15/test) previously standardized to the general population. Results were compared with normative data.

Results

Statistically significant differences with normative means were noted in the following tests: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), and NIH Toolbox Fine Motor (Dexterity and Grip Strength) tests. Cohort means for NIH Toolbox Fluid, Crystallized, and Cognitive Composite Scores and Timed Up and GO (TUG) were not different from normative means.

Conclusion

All tests were successfully completed by cohort. Whereas many aspects of cognition were normal, tests assessing visual-constructural, calculation, motor, and fluency functions did show differences from population means. Numerous tests assessing multiple domains are needed and can be used in future aging studies to appreciate the spectrum of cognitive and motor abilities in adults with SBM.

Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA (2001) Spina bifida outcome: A 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 34(3):114–120. https://doi.org/10.1159/000056005CrossRefPubMed

Mukherjee S, Pasulka J (2017) Care for adults with spina bifida: Current state and future directions. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 23(2):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2302-155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Barf HA, Post MW, Verhoef M, Gooskens RH, Prevo AJ (2010) Is cognitive functioning associated with subjective quality of life in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus? J Rehabil Med 42(1):56–59CrossRef

Dennis M, Salman MS, Jewell D, Hetherington R, Spiegler BJ, MacGregor DL, Drake JM, Humphreys RP, Gentili F (2009) Upper limb motor function in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 25(11):1447–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0948-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kulesz PA, Treble-Barna A, Williams VJ, Juranek J, Cirino PT, Dennis M, Fletcher JM (2015) Attention in spina bifida myelomeningocele: relations with brain volume and integrity. Neuroimage Clin 8:72–78CrossRef

Rose BM, Holmbeck GN (2007) Attention and executive functions in adolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Psychol 32(8):983–994. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm042CrossRefPubMed

Ware AL, Kulesz PA, Juranek J, Cirino PT, Fletcher JM (2017) Cognitive control and associated neural correlates in adults with spina bifida myelomeningocele. Neuropsychology 31(4):411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dennis M, Barnes M (2002) Math and numeracy in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Dev Neuropsychol 21(2):141–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2102_2CrossRefPubMed

Hetherington R, Dennis M, Barnes M, Drake J, Gentili F (2006) Functional outcome in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 22(2):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1231-4CrossRefPubMed

10.

Brinker MR, Rosenfeld SR, Feiwell E, Granger SP, Mitchell DC, Rice JC (1994) Myelomeningocele at the sacral level. Long-term outcomes in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(9):1293–1300. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199409000-00003CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bartonek A, Saraste H, Samuelsson L, Skoog M (1999) Ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele: A 12-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 19(2):202–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-199903000-00013CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jeste DV, Palmer BW, Appelbaum PS, Golshan S, Glorioso D, Dunn LB, Kim K, Meeks T, Kraemer HC (2007) A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64(8):966–974. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hall JR, Vo HT, Johnson LA, Barber RC, O’Bryant SE (2011) The link between cognitive measures and ADLs and IADL functioning in mild Alzheimer’s: What has gender got to do with it? Int J Alzheimers Dis 2011:276734–276736. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/276734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Pérès K, Helmer C, Amieva H, Orgogozo JM, Rouch I, Dartigues JF, Barberger-Gateau P (2008) Natural history of decline in instrumental activities of daily living performance over the 10 years preceding the clinical diagnosis of dementia: A prospective population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01499.xCrossRefPubMed

15.

Slotkin J, Nowinski C, Hays R, Beaumont J, Griffith J, Magasi S, Gershon R (2012) NIH Toolbox scoring and interpretation guide. Northwestern University and National Institutes of Health, Washington DC, pp 6–7

16.

StataCorp (2019) Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC, College Station

17.

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V et al (2005) The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment [published correction appears in J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991]. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4):695–699CrossRef

18.

Marshall GA, Zoller AS, Lorius N, Amariglio RE, Locascio JJ, Johnson KA, Sperling RA, Rentz DM (2015) Functional activities questionnaire items that best discriminate and predict progression from clinically normal to mild cognitive impairment. Curr Alzheimer Res 12(5):493–502CrossRef

19.

Pondal M, del Ser T (2008) Normative data and determinants for the timed “up and go” test in a population-based sample of elderly individuals without gait disturbances. J Geriatr Phys Ther 31(2):57–63CrossRef

20.

Fletcher JM, Ostermaier KK, Cirino PT, Dennis M (2008) Neurobehavioral outcomes in spina bifida: Processes versus outcomes. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 1(4):311–324PubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Barnes MA, Wilkinson M, Khemani E, Boudesquie A, Dennis M, Fletcher JM (2006) Arithmetic processing in children with spina bifida: Calculation accuracy, strategy use, and fact retrieval fluency. J Learn Disabil 39(2):174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390020601CrossRefPubMed

22.

English LH, Barnes MA, Taylor HB, Landry SH (2009) Mathematical development in spina bifida. Dev Disabil Res Rev 15(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Nieder A, Dehaene S (2009) Representation of number in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:185–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550CrossRefPubMed

24.

Holck P, Nettelbladt U, Sandberg AD (2009) Children with cerebral palsy, spina bifida and pragmatic language impairment: Differences and similarities in pragmatic ability. Res Dev Disabil 30(5):942–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.01.008CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tew B, Laurence KM (1979) The clinical and psychological characteristics of children with the “cocktail party” syndrome. Z Kinderchir Grenzgeb 28(4):360–367PubMed

26.

Vachha B, Adams R (2003) Language differences in young children with myelomeningocele and shunted hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 39(4):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1159/000072469CrossRefPubMed

27.

Huber-Okrainec J, Blaser SE, Dennis M (2005) Idiom comprehension deficits in relation to corpus callosum agenesis and hypoplasia in children with spina bifida meningomyelocele. Brain Lang 93(3):349–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.002CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nasreddine Z (2019) FAQ. Retrieved from https://www.mocatest.org/faq/. Accessed 29 June 2020

29.

Edge D, Oyefeso A, Evans C, Evans A (2016) The utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a mental capacity assessment tool for patients with a learning disability. Br J Learn Disabil 44(3):240–246CrossRef

30.

Edge D, Ewing L (2019) The predictive validity of the MoCA-LD for assessing mental capacity in adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 32(5):1280–1287PubMed

31.

Davis BE, Shurtleff DB, Walker WO, Seidel KD, Duguay S (2006) Acquisition of autonomy skills in adolescents with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 48(4):253–258CrossRef

32.

Dennis M, Barnes MA (2010) The cognitive phenotype of spina bifida meningomyelocele. Dev Disabil Res Rev 16(1):31–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.89CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Ware AL, Kulesz PA, Williams VJ, Juranek J, Cirino PT, Fletcher JM (2016) Gray matter integrity within regions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortical-subcortical network predicts executive function and fine motor dexterity in spina bifida. Neuropsychology 30(4):492–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Latcha CM, Freeling MC, Powell NJ (1993) A comparison of the grip strength of children with myelomeningocele to that of children without disability. Am J Occup Ther 47(6):498–503. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.6.498CrossRefPubMed

35.

Talamonti G, D’Aliberti G, Collice M (2007) Myelomeningocele: Long-term neurosurgical treatment and follow-up in 202 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr 107(5):368–386CrossRef

36.

Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD, Irwin BJ (1992) Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 8(2):92–96CrossRef

37.

McDonnell GV, McCann JP (2000) Issues of medical management in adults with spina bifida. Childs Nerv Syst 16(4):222–227CrossRef

38.

National Spina Bifida Patient Registry Findings (2019) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/spinabifida/nsbprregistryfindings.html. Accessed 11 June 2020

39.

Canfield MA, Mai CT, Wang Y, O’Halloran A, Marengo LK, Olney RS, Borger CL, Rutkowski R, Fornoff J, Irwin N, Copeland G, Flood TJ, Meyer RE, Rickard R, Alverson CJ, Sweatlock J, Kirby RS, for the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (2014) The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999-2007. Am J Public Health 104(9):e14–e23. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302098CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Cognitive and motor function in adults with spina bifida myelomeningocele: a pilot study
Authors: Joan Mary Jasien
Mohamad A. Mikati
Michaela Kolarova
Brian Smith
Stephanie Thera
Pierre Lee
Publication date: 01-04-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Spina Bifida
Spina Bifida
Published in: Child's Nervous System / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Electronic ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04964-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Cognitive and motor function in adults with spina bifida myelomeningocele: a pilot study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Seizure improvement following vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) battery change with cardiac-based seizure detection automatic stimulation (AutoStim): early experience in a regional paediatric unit

Infantile idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the setting of recent laminectomy and filum lysis for tethered cord syndrome: a case report and literature review

Association of Kabuki syndrome and tethered cord syndrome: a report of three cases and literature review

Surgical management of pediatric patients with peripheral nerve and plexus lesions caused by stray bullets

Sinus pericranii—unusual anatomic obstacle to posterior decompression on an amniotic band sequence

Long-term outcomes for children with an incidentally discovered Chiari malformation type 1: what is the clinical significance?