Top

Published in:

01-07-2014 | Original Article

SPIN: A Method of Skeleton-Based Polarity Identification for Neurons

Authors: Yi-Hsuan Lee, Yen-Nan Lin, Chao-Chun Chuang, Chung-Chuan Lo

Published in: Neuroinformatics | Issue 3/2014

Abstract

Directional signal transmission is essential for neural circuit function and thus for connectomic analysis. The directions of signal flow can be obtained by experimentally identifying neuronal polarity (axons or dendrites). However, the experimental techniques are not applicable to existing neuronal databases in which polarity information is not available. To address the issue, we proposed SPIN: a method of Skeleton-based Polarity Identification for Neurons. SPIN was designed to work with large-scale neuronal databases in which tracing-line data are available. In SPIN, a classifier is first trained by neurons with known polarity in two steps: 1) identifying morphological features that most correlate with the polarity and 2) constructing a linear classifier by determining a discriminant axis (a specific combination of the features) and decision boundaries. Each polarity-undefined neuron is then divided into several morphological substructures (domains) and the corresponding polarities are determined using the classifier. Finally, the result is evaluated and warnings for potential errors are returned. We tested this method on fruitfly (Drosophila melanogaster) and blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Calliphora erythrocephala) unipolar neurons using data obtained from the Flycircuit and Neuromorpho databases, respectively. On average, the polarity of 84–92 % of the terminal points in each neuron could be correctly identified. An ideal performance with an accuracy between 93 and 98 % can be achieved if we fed SPIN with relatively “clean” data without artificial branches. Our result demonstrates that SPIN, as a computer-based semi-automatic method, provides quick and accurate polarity identification and is particularly suitable for analyzing large-scale data. We implemented SPIN in Matlab and released the codes under the GPLv3 license.

Available only for authorised users

Alivisatos, A. P., Chun, M., Church, G. M., Greenspan, R. J., Roukes, M. L., & Yuste, R. (2012). The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics. Neuron, 74(6), 970–974. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.006.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Ascoli, G. A., Donohue, D. E., & Halavi, M. (2007). NeuroMorpho.Org: a central resource for neuronal morphologies. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(35), 9247–9251. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2055-07.2007.PubMedCrossRef

Bas, E., & Erdogmus, D. (2011). Principal curves as skeletons of tubular objects: locally characterizing the structures of axons. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 181–191. doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9105-2.PubMedCrossRef

Billeci, L., Magliaro, C., & Ahluwalia, A. (2013). NEuronMOrphological analysis tool: open-source software for quantitative morphometrics. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 2. doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00002.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Borst, A., & Haag, J. (1996). The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells: I. Passive membrane properties. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 3(4), 313–336. doi:10.1007/BF00161091.PubMedCrossRef

Brown, K. M., Barrionuevo, G., Canty, A. J., Paola, V., Hirsch, J. A., Jefferis, G. S. X. E., et al. (2011). The DIADEM data sets: representative light microscopy images of neuronal morphology to advance automation of digital reconstructions. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 143–157. doi:10.1007/s12021-010-9095-5.PubMedCrossRef

Campagne, M. V. L., Oestreicher, A. B., Henegouwen, P. M. P. V. B. E., & Gispen, W. H. (1990). Ultrastructural double localization of B-50/GAP43 and synaptophysin (p38) in the neonatal and adult rat hippocampus. Journal of Neurocytology, 19(6), 948–961. doi:10.1007/BF01186822.CrossRef

Cannon, R., Turner, D., Pyapali, G., & Wheal, H. (1998). An on-line archive of reconstructed hippocampal neurons. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 84(1–2), 49–54. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00091-0.PubMedCrossRef

Chiang, A.-S., Lin, C.-Y., Chang, H.-M., Hsieh, C.-H., Yeh, C.-W., & Hwang, J.-K. (2011). Three-dimensional reconstruction of brain-wide wiring networks in Drosophila at single-cell resolution. Current Biology, 21(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.056.PubMedCrossRef

Chothani, P., Mehta, V., & Stepanyants, A. (2011). Automated tracing of neurites from light microscopy stacks of images. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 263–278. doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9121-2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Chou, Y.-H., Spletter, M. L., Yaksi, E., Leong, J. C. S., Wilson, R. I., & Luo, L. (2010). Diversity and wiring variability of olfactory local interneurons in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 13(4), 439–449. doi:10.1038/nn.2489.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Craig, A. M., & Banker, G. (1994). Neuronal polarity. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 17(1), 267–310. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001411.PubMedCrossRef

Cuntz, H., Forstner, F., Haag, J., & Borst, A. (2008). The morphological identity of insect dendrites. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(12), e1000251. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000251.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Cuntz, H., Forstner, F., Borst, A., & Häusser, M. (2010). One rule to grow them all: a general theory of neuronal branching and its practical application. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(8), e1000877. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000877.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Donohue, D. E., & Ascoli, G. A. (2011). Automated reconstruction of neuronal morphology: an overview. Brain Research Reviews, 67(1–2), 94–102. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.11.003.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Duchene, J., & Leclercq, S. (1988). An optimal transformation for discriminant and principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10(6), 978–983. doi:10.1109/34.9121.CrossRef

Feinberg, E. H., VanHoven, M. K., Bendesky, A., Wang, G., Fetter, R. D., Shen, K., et al. (2008). GFP reconstitution across synaptic partners (GRASP) defines cell contacts and synapses in living nervous systems. Neuron, 57(3), 353–363. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.030.PubMedCrossRef

Fischbach, P. K.-F., & Dittrich, A. P. M. (1989). The optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. I. A Golgi analysis of wild-type structure. Cell and Tissue Research, 258(3), 441–475. doi:10.1007/BF00218858.CrossRef

Gillette, T. A., Brown, K. M., & Ascoli, G. A. (2011). The DIADEM metric: comparing multiple reconstructions of the same neuron. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 233–245. doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9117-y.PubMedCrossRef

Glaser, J. R., & Glaser, E. M. (1990). Neuron imaging with Neurolucida–a PC-based system for image combining microscopy. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics: the Official Journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 14(5), 307–317.CrossRef

Gordon, M. D., & Scott, K. (2009). Motor control in a Drosophila taste circuit. Neuron, 61(3), 373–384. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.033.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Hanesch, U., Fischbach, K.-F., & Heisenberg, M. (1989). Neuronal architecture of the central complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell and Tissue Research, 257(2), 343–366. doi:10.1007/BF00261838.CrossRef

Heinze, S., & Homberg, U. (2008). Neuroarchitecture of the central complex of the desert locust: intrinsic and columnar neurons. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 511(4), 454–478. doi:10.1002/cne.21842.PubMedCrossRef

Ikeno, H., Kanzaki, R., Aonuma, H., Takahata, M., Mizunami, M., Yasuyama, K., et al. (2008). Development of invertebrate brain platform: Management of research resources for invertebrate neuroscience and neuroethology. In M. Ishikawa, K. Doya, H. Miyamoto, & T. Yamakawa (Eds.), Neural information processing (pp. 905–914). Springer: Berlin. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-69162-4_94.CrossRef

Ito, M., Masuda, N., Shinomiya, K., Endo, K., & Ito, K. (2013). Systematic analysis of neural projections reveals clonal composition of the Drosophila brain. Current Biology, 23(8), 644–655. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.015.PubMedCrossRef

Jang, J.-S. R. (2012). Machine Learning Toolbox. http://mirlab.org/jang/matlab/toolbox/machineLearning. Accessed 12 June 2012.

Lee, P.-C., Chuang, C.-C., Chiang, A.-S., & Ching, Y.-T. (2012). High-throughput computer method for 3D neuronal structure reconstruction from the image stack of the Drosophila brain and its applications. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(9), e1002658. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002658.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Lin, C.-Y., Chuang, C.-C., Hua, T.-E., Chen, C.-C., Dickson, B. J., Greenspan, R. J., et al. (2013a). A comprehensive wiring diagram of the protocerebral bridge for visual information processing in the Drosophila brain. Cell Reports, 3(5), 1739–1753. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.022.PubMedCrossRef

Lin, H.-H., Chu, L.-A., Fu, T.-F., Dickson, B. J., & Chiang, A.-S. (2013b). Parallel neural pathways mediate CO2 avoidance responses in Drosophila. Science, 340(6138), 1338–1341. doi:10.1126/science.1236693.PubMedCrossRef

Luczak, A. (2010). Measuring neuronal branching patterns using model-based approach. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 4, 10. doi:10.3389/fncom.2010.00135.

Matus, A., Bernhardt, R., & Hugh-Jones, T. (1981). High molecular weight microtubule-associated proteins are preferentially associated with dendritic microtubules in brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 78(5), 3010–3014.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Müller, M., Homberg, U., & Kühn, A. (1997). Neuroarchitecture of the lower division of the central body in the brain of the locust (Schistocerca gregaria). Cell and Tissue Research, 288(1), 159–176.PubMedCrossRef

Parekh, R., & Ascoli, G. A. (2013). Neuronal morphology goes digital: a research hub for cellular and system neuroscience. Neuron, 77(6), 1017–1038. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.008.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Pastrana, E. (2013). Focus on mapping the brain. Nature Methods, 10(6), 481. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2509.PubMedCrossRef

Peng, H., Ruan, Z., Long, F., Simpson, J. H., & Myers, E. W. (2010). V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets. Nature Biotechnology, 28(4), 348–353. doi:10.1038/nbt.1612.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Robinson, I. M., Ranjan, R., & Schwarz, T. L. (2002). Synaptotagmins I and IV promote transmitter release independently of Ca2+ binding in the C2A domain. Nature, 418(6895), 336–340. doi:10.1038/nature00915.PubMedCrossRef

Rolls, M. M. (2011). Neuronal polarity in Drosophila: sorting out axons and dendrites. Developmental Neurobiology, 71(6), 419–429. doi:10.1002/dneu.20836.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Rolls, M. M., Satoh, D., Clyne, P. J., Henner, A. L., Uemura, T., & Doe, C. Q. (2007). Polarity and intracellular compartmentalization of Drosophila neurons. Neural Development, 2(1), 7. doi:10.1186/1749-8104-2-7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Scorcioni, R., Polavaram, S., & Ascoli, G. A. (2008). L-Measure: a web-accessible tool for the analysis, comparison and search of digital reconstructions of neuronal morphologies. Nature Protocols, 3(5), 866–876. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.51.PubMedCrossRef

Squire, L. R., Berg, D., Bloom, F., Lac, S. du, & Ghosh, A. (2008). Subcellular organization of the nervous system: organelles and their functions. In Fundamental Neuroscience (3rd ed., pp. 59–86). Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press.

Strausfeld, N. J., & Hausen, K. (1977). The resolution of neuronal assemblies after cobalt injection into neuropil. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 199(1136), 463–476. doi:10.1098/rspb.1977.0154.CrossRef

Takemura, S., Bharioke, A., Lu, Z., Nern, A., Vitaladevuni, S., Rivlin, P. K., et al. (2013). A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics. Nature, 500(7461), 175–181. doi:10.1038/nature12450.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Türetken, E., González, G., Blum, C., & Fua, P. (2011). Automated reconstruction of dendritic and axonal trees by global optimization with geometric priors. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 279–302. doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9122-1.PubMedCrossRef

Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2011). Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(2), e1001066. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001066.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Wang, T., & Liao, D. (2011). Neuronal morphology classification based on SVM. In Computer Science and Service System (CSSS), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 3344–3347). doi:10.1109/CSSS.2011.5972187.

Wang, Y., Narayanaswamy, A., Tsai, C.-L., & Roysam, B. (2011b). A broadly applicable 3-D neuron tracing method based on open-curve snake. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 193–217. doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9110-5.PubMedCrossRef

Wang, J., Ma, X., Yang, J. S., Zheng, X., Zugates, C. T., Lee, C.-H. J., et al. (2004). Transmembrane/juxtamembrane domain-dependent dscam distribution and function during mushroom body neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron, 43(5), 663–672. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.033.PubMedCrossRef

White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986). The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences, 314(1165), 1–340. doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056.CrossRef

Whitney, A. W. (1971). A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-20(9), 1100–1103. doi:10.1109/T-C.1971.223410.CrossRef

Wichterle, H., Gifford, D., & Mazzoni, E. (2013). Mapping neuronal diversity one cell at a time. Science, 341(6147), 726–727. doi:10.1126/science.1235884.PubMedCrossRef

Xiao, H., & Peng, H. (2013). APP2: automatic tracing of 3D neuron morphology based on hierarchical pruning of a gray-weighted image distance-tree. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 29(11), 1448–1454. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt170.CrossRef

Yu, H.-H., Awasaki, T., Schroeder, M. D., Long, F., Yang, J. S., He, Y., et al. (2013). Clonal development and organization of the adult Drosophila central brain. Current Biology, 23(8), 633–643. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.057.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Zhao, T., Xie, J., Amat, F., Clack, N., Ahammad, P., Peng, H., et al. (2011). Automated reconstruction of neuronal morphology based on local geometrical and global structural models. Neuroinformatics, 9(2–3), 247–261. doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9120-3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Title: SPIN: A Method of Skeleton-Based Polarity Identification for Neurons
Authors: Yi-Hsuan Lee
Yen-Nan Lin
Chao-Chun Chuang
Chung-Chuan Lo
Publication date: 01-07-2014
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Neuroinformatics / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1539-2791
Electronic ISSN: 1559-0089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-014-9225-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

SPIN: A Method of Skeleton-Based Polarity Identification for Neurons

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Data Persistence Insurance

Efficient Spiking Neural Network Model of Pattern Motion Selectivity in Visual Cortex

Identifying Informative Imaging Biomarkers via Tree Structured Sparse Learning for AD Diagnosis

Intensity Based Methods for Brain MRI Longitudinal Registration. A Study on Multiple Sclerosis Patients

MANIA—A Pattern Classification Toolbox for Neuroimaging Data

Improving the Execution Performance of FreeSurfer