Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Care Analysis 4/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Speaking Out and Being Heard Residents’ Committees in Quebec’s Residential Long-Term Care Centre

Authors: Éric Gagnon, Michèle Clément, Lilianne Bordeleau

Published in: Health Care Analysis | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Residents’ councils in Quebec’s residential and long-term care centres have the mandate to promote the improvement of living conditions for residents, to assess their level of satisfaction, and to defend their rights. Based on two studies on the autonomy of councils, we examined how committees can express themselves on topics other than those the management is already aware of, to reveal various previously unknown aspects of the services, and to voice unexpressed concerns. We are especially interested in what makes management receptive, or not, to what the committee members say. The councils’ ability to express them selves is, in fact, inseparable from its capacity to listen to the management teams, and we seek to determine the conditions required to perform this dual capacity.
Footnotes
1
Approximately 11 % of residents are under the age of 65, and also unable to live at home due to a disability or illness MSSS [15].
 
2
They are elected during general assemblies of residents and their families.
 
3
This broad interpretation of autonomy is based on the works of Paul Ricœur [20]. An individual is autonomous when he has the capacity to say (to express and own a point a view), to act (to have some influence on the way things are done) and to recount (to be the narrator of one’s own life story). However, a committee is not an individual or an agent. Ricœur’s definition of autonomy or agency must be adapted, especially when it comes to the third capacity (narrating). The committee is autonomous when his members are able to speak, to have a level of influence on the decision and to change the understanding of the events, the needs, the story or the experiences of the residents. Our work is a continuation of the few studies conducted elsewhere on residents' committees, based mainly on the autonomy and influence of committees, while seeking to broaden the perspective Funk [7], Meyer [14], O'Dwyer and Timonen [18].
 
4
Five CHSLD were located in a large city (n = 5), two in a small town (n = 2) and two in a rural setting (n = 2). The size of the residential and long-term care centre varied from less than 50 to more than 150 beds. In total, we attended 42 meetings. We took notes of the object of the discussions (topics or issues discussed), the content of the discussion (questions, answers, information shared), the flow and speaking order (agenda, case tracking, outside speakers, members interventions, public speaking support), the requests, recommendations or demands made, as well as how they were sent to those responsible, links with management (presence of the coordinator, information and answers given, follow-up to previous requests) and other bodies within and outside the institution.
 
5
All eight residential and long-term care centres are located in an urban area. Interviews were conducted with 24 committee members (3 for every committee) and 7 interviews with administrators who attend the meetings and address the demands. The interviews focused on the functioning of the committee, the nature of the discussions, the motivation of its members to engage in it, the relationship with management and its autonomy. We assisted one meeting of each committee in situ observation.
 
6
The two studies were approved by the research ethics committee of the Centre de santé et de services sociaux de la Vieille-Capitale on October 3rd 2008 and September 19th 2012 (projects # 2008-2009-16 and #2012-2013-13).
 
7
A code is used to identify examples and comments. Roman numerals indicate from which study the observation or comment is taken from; Arabic numerals indicate the committee where the observation or comment was collected.
 
8
The main functions of the regional agencies are the coordination and development of health and social services in a region and to allocate regional resources to long term care facilities and community organizations.
 
9
The issue of loyalty has been addressed elsewhere Gagnon et al. [9].
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abelson, J., Eyles, J., McLeod, C. B., Collins, P., McMullan, C., & Forest, P.-G. (2002). Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy, 66, 95–106.CrossRef Abelson, J., Eyles, J., McLeod, C. B., Collins, P., McMullan, C., & Forest, P.-G. (2002). Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy, 66, 95–106.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beierle, T. C. (1999). Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Policy Studies Review, 16(3/4), 76–103. Beierle, T. C. (1999). Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Policy Studies Review, 16(3/4), 76–103.
3.
go back to reference Blacksher, E., Diebel, A., Forest, P.-G., Goold, D. D., & Abelson, J. (2012). What Is Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 14–17.CrossRefPubMed Blacksher, E., Diebel, A., Forest, P.-G., Goold, D. D., & Abelson, J. (2012). What Is Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 14–17.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Carlier, L. (2013). Les ambivalence de la démocratie urbaine. Politique et Sociétés, 32(1), 89–106.CrossRef Carlier, L. (2013). Les ambivalence de la démocratie urbaine. Politique et Sociétés, 32(1), 89–106.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Forest, P.-G. (2003). Participation et publics dans le système de santé du Québec. In V. Lemieux, P. Bergeron, C. Bégin, & G. Bélanger (Eds.), Le système de santé au Québec (pp. 177–200). Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval. Forest, P.-G. (2003). Participation et publics dans le système de santé du Québec. In V. Lemieux, P. Bergeron, C. Bégin, & G. Bélanger (Eds.), Le système de santé au Québec (pp. 177–200). Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
7.
go back to reference Funk, L. M. (2003). Who Wants to be Involved? Decision-Making Preferences among Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23(1), 47–58.CrossRef Funk, L. M. (2003). Who Wants to be Involved? Decision-Making Preferences among Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23(1), 47–58.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gadamer, H. G., (1989). Truth and Method, 2nd rev. edn. (1st English edn, 1975), trans. by J. Weinsheimer & D.G.Marshall. New York: Crossroad. Gadamer, H. G., (1989). Truth and Method, 2nd rev. edn. (1st English edn, 1975), trans. by J. Weinsheimer & D.G.Marshall. New York: Crossroad.
9.
go back to reference Gagnon, É., Clément, M., Deshaies, M.-H., & Raizenne, É. (2014). Fonctions et limites de la participation publique. Les comités de résidents en centre d’hébergement et leur autonomie. Recherches sociographiques, LV, 1, 31–52.CrossRef Gagnon, É., Clément, M., Deshaies, M.-H., & Raizenne, É. (2014). Fonctions et limites de la participation publique. Les comités de résidents en centre d’hébergement et leur autonomie. Recherches sociographiques, LV, 1, 31–52.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grondin, J. (1993). L’universalité de l’herméneutique. Paris: PUF. Grondin, J. (1993). L’universalité de l’herméneutique. Paris: PUF.
11.
go back to reference Grondin, J. (2002). Gadamer’s Basic Understanding of Understanding. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer (pp. 36–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Grondin, J. (2002). Gadamer’s Basic Understanding of Understanding. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer (pp. 36–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hettema, T. L. (2014). Autonomy and its vulnerability: Ricœur’s view on justice as a contribution to care ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17, 493–498.CrossRef Hettema, T. L. (2014). Autonomy and its vulnerability: Ricœur’s view on justice as a contribution to care ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17, 493–498.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lamoureux, J. (2008). Paroles dérangeantes, scènes inédites, subversion égalitaire. Réflexions sur la subjectivation politique. In L. Blais (Ed.) Vivre à la marge (pp. 213–240). Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval. Lamoureux, J. (2008). Paroles dérangeantes, scènes inédites, subversion égalitaire. Réflexions sur la subjectivation politique. In L. Blais (Ed.) Vivre à la marge (pp. 213–240). Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
14.
go back to reference Meyer, M. H. (1991). Assuring Quality of Care: Nursing Home Resident Councils. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 10(1), 103–116.CrossRefPubMed Meyer, M. H. (1991). Assuring Quality of Care: Nursing Home Resident Councils. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 10(1), 103–116.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS). (2003). Un milieu de vie de qualité pour les personnes hébergées en CHSLD. Orientations ministérielles. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS). (2003). Un milieu de vie de qualité pour les personnes hébergées en CHSLD. Orientations ministérielles. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
16.
go back to reference Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS). (2006). Cadre de référence sur l’exercice des fonctions à assumer par les membres des comités des usagers et des comités de residents. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS). (2006). Cadre de référence sur l’exercice des fonctions à assumer par les membres des comités des usagers et des comités de residents. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
17.
go back to reference Nielson, C. R. (2013). Hearing the Other’s Voice: How Gadamer’s Fusion of Horizons and Open-ended Understanding Respects the Other and Puts Oneself in Question. Otherness: Essays and Studies 4.1 Philosophy and the Other, Sept. 2013. Nielson, C. R. (2013). Hearing the Other’s Voice: How Gadamer’s Fusion of Horizons and Open-ended Understanding Respects the Other and Puts Oneself in Question. Otherness: Essays and Studies 4.1 Philosophy and the Other, Sept. 2013.
18.
go back to reference O’Dwyer, C., & Timonen, V. (2010). Rethinking the Value of Residents’ Councils: Observations and Lessons From an Exploratory Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(6), 762–771.CrossRef O’Dwyer, C., & Timonen, V. (2010). Rethinking the Value of Residents’ Councils: Observations and Lessons From an Exploratory Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(6), 762–771.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ricœur, P. (1986). Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Ricœur, P. (1986). Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
20.
go back to reference Ricœur, P. (2001). Le juste II. Paris: Esprit. Ricœur, P. (2001). Le juste II. Paris: Esprit.
21.
go back to reference Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the Human Sciences. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer (pp. 126–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the Human Sciences. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer (pp. 126–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
Title
Speaking Out and Being Heard Residents’ Committees in Quebec’s Residential Long-Term Care Centre
Authors
Éric Gagnon
Michèle Clément
Lilianne Bordeleau
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Health Care Analysis / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1065-3058
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3394
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-015-0301-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Health Care Analysis 4/2017 Go to the issue