Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Article

Somatosensory evoked potential from S1 nerve root stimulation

Authors: Xiao-Dong Wu, Yu Zhu, Wen-Jun Chen, Xiang Jin, Nicholas Tsai, Huang-Yuan Huang, Jian-Yuan Jiang, Dong-Qing Zhu, Pei-Ying Li, Robert Weber, Wen Yuan, Hua-Jiang Chen

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to detect cerebral potentials elicited by proximal stimulation of the first sacral (S1) nerve root at the S1 dorsal foramen and to investigate latency and amplitude of the first cerebral potential. Tibial nerve SEP and S1 nerve root SEP were obtained from 20 healthy subjects and 5 patients with unilateral sciatic nerve or tibial nerve injury. Stimulation of the S1 nerve root was performed by a needle electrode via the S1 dorsal foramen. Cerebral potentials were recorded twice to document reproducibility. Latencies and amplitudes of the first cerebral potentials were recorded. Reproducible cerebral evoked potentials were recorded and P20s were identified in 36 of 40 limbs in the healthy subjects. The mean latency of P20 was 19.8 ± 1.6 ms. The mean amplitude of P20–N30 was 1.2 ± 0.9 μV. In the five patients, P40 of tibial nerve SEP was absent, while well-defined cerebral potentials of S1 nerve root SEP were recorded and P20 was identified from the involved side. This method may be useful in detecting S1 nerve root lesion and other disorders affecting the proximal portions of somatosensory pathway. Combined with tibial nerve SEP, it may provide useful information for diagnosis of lesions affecting the peripheral nerve versus the central portion of somatosensory pathway.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bamford CR, Graeme K, Guthkelch AN, Dzioba R (1993) Posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potentials from distal, middle and proximal lower limb stimulation. A comparative study. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 33:79–89PubMed Bamford CR, Graeme K, Guthkelch AN, Dzioba R (1993) Posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potentials from distal, middle and proximal lower limb stimulation. A comparative study. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 33:79–89PubMed
2.
go back to reference Robinson LR, Slimp JC, Anderson PA, Stolov WC (1993) The efficacy of femoral nerve intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Spine 18:1793–1797PubMedCrossRef Robinson LR, Slimp JC, Anderson PA, Stolov WC (1993) The efficacy of femoral nerve intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Spine 18:1793–1797PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kimura J (2001) Assessment of individual nerves. In: Kimura J (ed) Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 167–177 Kimura J (2001) Assessment of individual nerves. In: Kimura J (ed) Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 167–177
4.
go back to reference Jin X, Zhu Y, Lu FZ, Wu XD, Zhu DQ, Weber R, Dunn B, Jiang JY (2010) H-reflex to S1-root stimulation improves utility for diagnosing S1 radiculopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1329–1335PubMedCrossRef Jin X, Zhu Y, Lu FZ, Wu XD, Zhu DQ, Weber R, Dunn B, Jiang JY (2010) H-reflex to S1-root stimulation improves utility for diagnosing S1 radiculopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1329–1335PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Alfonsi E, Merlo IM, Clerici AM, Candeloro E, Marchioni E, Moglia A (2003) Proximal nerve conduction by high-voltage electrical stimulation in S1 radiculopathies and acquired demyelinating neuropathies. Clin Neurophysiol 114:239–247PubMedCrossRef Alfonsi E, Merlo IM, Clerici AM, Candeloro E, Marchioni E, Moglia A (2003) Proximal nerve conduction by high-voltage electrical stimulation in S1 radiculopathies and acquired demyelinating neuropathies. Clin Neurophysiol 114:239–247PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tsai TM, Tsai CL, Lin TS, Lin CC, Jou IM (2005) Value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in detecting acute nerve root injury: an experimental study with special emphasis on stimulus intensity. Spine 30:E540–E546PubMedCrossRef Tsai TM, Tsai CL, Lin TS, Lin CC, Jou IM (2005) Value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in detecting acute nerve root injury: an experimental study with special emphasis on stimulus intensity. Spine 30:E540–E546PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jou IM (2004) The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials. Spine 29:147–155PubMedCrossRef Jou IM (2004) The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials. Spine 29:147–155PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mauguiere F (1999) Somatosensory evoked potentials: normal responses, abnormal waveforms and clinical applications in neurological diseases. In: Niedermeyer E (ed) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related field, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1014–1049 Mauguiere F (1999) Somatosensory evoked potentials: normal responses, abnormal waveforms and clinical applications in neurological diseases. In: Niedermeyer E (ed) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related field, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1014–1049
9.
go back to reference Yamada T, Matsubara M, Shiraishi G, Yeh M, Kawasaki M (1996) Topographic analyses of somatosensory evoked potentials following stimulation of tibial, sural and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:33–43PubMedCrossRef Yamada T, Matsubara M, Shiraishi G, Yeh M, Kawasaki M (1996) Topographic analyses of somatosensory evoked potentials following stimulation of tibial, sural and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:33–43PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kakigi R, Hoshiyama M, Shimojo M et al (2000) The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Prog Neurobiol 61:495–523PubMedCrossRef Kakigi R, Hoshiyama M, Shimojo M et al (2000) The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Prog Neurobiol 61:495–523PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Simões C, Mertens M, Forss N, Jousmäki V, Lütkenhöner B, Hari R (2001) Functional overlap of finger representations in human SI and SII cortices. J Neurophysiol 86:1661–1665PubMed Simões C, Mertens M, Forss N, Jousmäki V, Lütkenhöner B, Hari R (2001) Functional overlap of finger representations in human SI and SII cortices. J Neurophysiol 86:1661–1665PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bollini CA, Urmey WF, Vascello L, Cacheiro F (2003) Relationship between evoked motor response and sensory paresthesia in interscalene brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:384–388PubMed Bollini CA, Urmey WF, Vascello L, Cacheiro F (2003) Relationship between evoked motor response and sensory paresthesia in interscalene brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:384–388PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Claudio RE, Hadzic N, Thys DM, Santos AC (2004) Electrical nerve localization: effects of cutaneous electrode placement and duration of the stimulus on motor response. Anesthesiology 100:1526–1530PubMedCrossRef Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Claudio RE, Hadzic N, Thys DM, Santos AC (2004) Electrical nerve localization: effects of cutaneous electrode placement and duration of the stimulus on motor response. Anesthesiology 100:1526–1530PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Karaca P, Hadzic A, Yufa M, Vloka JD, Brown AR, Visan A, Sanborn K, Santos AC (2003) Painful paresthesiae are infrequent during brachial plexus localization using low-current peripheral nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:380–383PubMed Karaca P, Hadzic A, Yufa M, Vloka JD, Brown AR, Visan A, Sanborn K, Santos AC (2003) Painful paresthesiae are infrequent during brachial plexus localization using low-current peripheral nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:380–383PubMed
15.
go back to reference Urmey WF, Grossi P (2006) Use of sequential electrical nerve stimuli (SENS) for location of the sciatic nerve and lumbar plexus. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:463–469PubMed Urmey WF, Grossi P (2006) Use of sequential electrical nerve stimuli (SENS) for location of the sciatic nerve and lumbar plexus. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:463–469PubMed
16.
go back to reference Stecker MM (2004) Nerve stimulation with an electrode of finite size: differences between constant current and constant voltage stimulation. Comput Biol Med 34:51–94PubMedCrossRef Stecker MM (2004) Nerve stimulation with an electrode of finite size: differences between constant current and constant voltage stimulation. Comput Biol Med 34:51–94PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Valls-Solé J, Hallett M, Brasil-Neto J (1998) Modulation of vastus medialis motoneuronal excitability by sciatic nerve afferents. Muscle Nerve 21:936–939PubMedCrossRef Valls-Solé J, Hallett M, Brasil-Neto J (1998) Modulation of vastus medialis motoneuronal excitability by sciatic nerve afferents. Muscle Nerve 21:936–939PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Somatosensory evoked potential from S1 nerve root stimulation
Authors
Xiao-Dong Wu
Yu Zhu
Wen-Jun Chen
Xiang Jin
Nicholas Tsai
Huang-Yuan Huang
Jian-Yuan Jiang
Dong-Qing Zhu
Pei-Ying Li
Robert Weber
Wen Yuan
Hua-Jiang Chen
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1768-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

European Spine Journal 10/2011 Go to the issue