Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Odontology 3/2017

01-07-2017 | Original Article

Soft tissue changes after a mandibular osteotomy for symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion

Authors: Seigo Ohba, Haruka Kohara, Takamitsu Koga, Takako Kawasaki, Kei-ichirou Miura, Noriaki Yoshida, Izumi Asahina

Published in: Odontology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The soft tissue profile is crucial to esthetics after orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the soft tissue changes of the subnasal and submental regions more than 1 year after a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. A total of 22 patients with mandibular prognathism were included in this study. Patients had lateral cephalograms before and more than 1 year after they underwent an isolated SSRO. Soft and hard tissue changes were assessed using the lateral cephalograms. The lower lip, labiomenton, and soft tissue menton moved posteriorly by 85, 89, and 88% compared with the corresponding hard tissue, and the movement of the soft tissue B point and the top of the chin nearly reflected the displacement of the hard tissues, at 96 and 99%, respectively. The labiomenton, stomions, and naso-labial angles were changed after the mandibular set-back and the changes in these angles correlated with either the width of the soft tissue or skeletal displacement. The naso-labial angle could be altered even if an isolated mandibular osteotomy is performed. Changes to the stomions and naso-labial angles were affected by hard tissue movement, while changes to the labiomental angle were affected by the width of the soft tissue after the mandibular osteotomy. It is important to create an accurate preoperative prediction of the esthetic outcomes after a mandibular osteotomy by considering the interrelations between the hard and soft tissues.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontology. 2000;1996(11):18–28. Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontology. 2000;1996(11):18–28.
2.
go back to reference Ghassemi M, Hilgers RD, Jamilian A, Hölzle F, Fritz U, Gerressen M, Ghassemi A. Consideration of effect of the amount of mandibular setback on the submental resion in the planning of orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:334–9.CrossRefPubMed Ghassemi M, Hilgers RD, Jamilian A, Hölzle F, Fritz U, Gerressen M, Ghassemi A. Consideration of effect of the amount of mandibular setback on the submental resion in the planning of orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:334–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Phillips C, Broder HL, Bennett ME. Dentofacial disharmony: motivations for seeking treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:7–15.PubMedPubMedCentral Phillips C, Broder HL, Bennett ME. Dentofacial disharmony: motivations for seeking treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:7–15.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Proffit WR, White RP Jr. Who needs surgicalorthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 1990;5:81. Proffit WR, White RP Jr. Who needs surgicalorthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 1990;5:81.
5.
go back to reference Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Spiedel TM. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:1–25.PubMed Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Spiedel TM. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:1–25.PubMed
6.
go back to reference McCollum AG, Evans WG. Facial soft tissue: the alpha and omega of treatment planning in orthognathic surgey. Semin Ortho. 2009;15:196–216.CrossRef McCollum AG, Evans WG. Facial soft tissue: the alpha and omega of treatment planning in orthognathic surgey. Semin Ortho. 2009;15:196–216.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Becker OE, Avelar RL, do Dolzan NA, Haas OL Jr, Scholari N, de Oliveira RB. Soft and hard tissue changed in skeletal class III patients treated with double-jaw orthognathic surgery- maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:204–12.CrossRefPubMed Becker OE, Avelar RL, do Dolzan NA, Haas OL Jr, Scholari N, de Oliveira RB. Soft and hard tissue changed in skeletal class III patients treated with double-jaw orthognathic surgery- maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:204–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Soncul M, Bamber MA. Evaluation of facial soft tissue changes with optical surface scan after surgical correction of class III deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1331–40.CrossRefPubMed Soncul M, Bamber MA. Evaluation of facial soft tissue changes with optical surface scan after surgical correction of class III deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1331–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Aydemir H, Efendiyeva R, Karasu H, Toygar-Memikoğlu U. Evaluation of long-term soft tissue changes after biomaxillary orthognathic surgery in class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:631–7.CrossRefPubMed Aydemir H, Efendiyeva R, Karasu H, Toygar-Memikoğlu U. Evaluation of long-term soft tissue changes after biomaxillary orthognathic surgery in class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:631–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chew MT. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:959–63.PubMed Chew MT. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:959–63.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Altug-Atac AT, Bolatoglu H, Memikoglu UT. Facial soft tissue profile following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:50–7.CrossRefPubMed Altug-Atac AT, Bolatoglu H, Memikoglu UT. Facial soft tissue profile following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:50–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Robinson SW, Speidel TM, Isaagson RJ, et al. Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:227–35.PubMed Robinson SW, Speidel TM, Isaagson RJ, et al. Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:227–35.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hershey HG, Smith LH. Soft-tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:483–502.CrossRefPubMed Hershey HG, Smith LH. Soft-tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:483–502.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Suckiel JM, Kohn MW. Soft-tissue changes related to the surgical management of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:676–80.CrossRefPubMed Suckiel JM, Kohn MW. Soft-tissue changes related to the surgical management of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:676–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee ST, Minami K, An CH, Park JW, Kwon TG. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:1577–87.CrossRefPubMed Lee ST, Minami K, An CH, Park JW, Kwon TG. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:1577–87.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jung YJ, Kim MJ, Baek SH. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognarhism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:76–771.CrossRef Jung YJ, Kim MJ, Baek SH. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognarhism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:76–771.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Verdenik M, Ihan Hren N. Differences in three-dimensional soft tissue changes after upper, lower or both jaw orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:1345–51.CrossRefPubMed Verdenik M, Ihan Hren N. Differences in three-dimensional soft tissue changes after upper, lower or both jaw orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:1345–51.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hunsuck EE. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1968;26:250–3.PubMed Hunsuck EE. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1968;26:250–3.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Epker BN. Modification in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg. 1977;35:157–9.PubMed Epker BN. Modification in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg. 1977;35:157–9.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Yang HJ, Lee WJ, Yi WJ, Hwang SJ. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:18–24.CrossRefPubMed Yang HJ, Lee WJ, Yi WJ, Hwang SJ. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:18–24.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ohba S, Yoshida M, Kohara H, Kawasaki T, Minamizato T, Koga T, Nakatanin Y, Watanabe E, Nakao N, Yoshida N, Asahina I. Short lingual osteotomy without fixation; a new strategy for mandibular osteotomy known as “physiological positioning”. Br J Oral Maxillolfac Surg. 2014;52:e9–13.CrossRef Ohba S, Yoshida M, Kohara H, Kawasaki T, Minamizato T, Koga T, Nakatanin Y, Watanabe E, Nakao N, Yoshida N, Asahina I. Short lingual osteotomy without fixation; a new strategy for mandibular osteotomy known as “physiological positioning”. Br J Oral Maxillolfac Surg. 2014;52:e9–13.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ohba S, Nakao N, Nakatani Y, Kawasaki T, Minamizato T, Koga T, Kohara H, Yoshida N, Asahina I. The skeletal stability after maxilla-mandibular osteotomy with a “physiological positioning strategy”. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:965–9.CrossRefPubMed Ohba S, Nakao N, Nakatani Y, Kawasaki T, Minamizato T, Koga T, Kohara H, Yoshida N, Asahina I. The skeletal stability after maxilla-mandibular osteotomy with a “physiological positioning strategy”. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:965–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1978;36:269–75.PubMed Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1978;36:269–75.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Legan HL, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:744–51.PubMed Legan HL, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:744–51.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Soft tissue changes after a mandibular osteotomy for symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion
Authors
Seigo Ohba
Haruka Kohara
Takamitsu Koga
Takako Kawasaki
Kei-ichirou Miura
Noriaki Yoshida
Izumi Asahina
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Odontology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Electronic ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0280-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Odontology 3/2017 Go to the issue