Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Socio-demographic characteristics associated with perceived social support among parents of children aged 0–7 years: the CIKEO study

Authors: Irene N. Fierloos, Dafna A. Windhorst, Yuan Fang, Harrie Jonkman, Matty R. Crone, Clemens M. H. Hosman, Siok Swan Tan, Hein Raat

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social support has been associated with numerous positive outcomes for families’ health, wellbeing and empowerment. This study examined which socio-demographic characteristics are associated with perceived social support among parents of children aged 0–7 years.

Method

Cross-sectional data of 1007 parents of children aged 0–7 years, gathered in the CIKEO cohort study in the Netherlands, were analysed. Social support was assessed with the Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Linear regression models were used to examine associations between socio-demographic characteristics and perceived social support.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 34.1 years (SD = 5.1); 92.9% were mothers. The multivariable regression model showed that fathers (β: -0.15, 95% CI: − 0.22, − 0.08), parents with a low educational level (β: -0.12, 95% CI: 0.18, − 0.06), parents with a low income (β: -0.10, 95% CI: − 0.19, − 0.01), unemployed parents (β: -0.14, 95% CI: − 0.20, − 0.07), and parents of older children (β: -0.07; 95% CI: − 0.13, 0.00) perceived lower levels of social support. Interaction analyses showed that parents with a migration background and a low educational level were particularly susceptible to perceiving lower levels of support (β: -0.34, 95% CI: − 0.52, − 0.15).

Conclusion

Fathers, parents with a low educational level, parents with a low income, unemployed parents, parents of older children, and parents with both a migration background and a low educational level are at increased risk of perceiving lower levels of social support.

Implications

We recommend to develop, implement and evaluate intervention strategies to strengthen perceived social support among the abovementioned subgroups of parents, in order to improve families’ health, wellbeing and empowerment.

Trial registration

NTR7607 in the Netherlands trial registry.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Turner RJ, Brown RL. Social support and mental health. A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems. 2010;2:200–12.
2.
Uchino BN. Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med. 2006;29(4):377–87.CrossRef
3.
Uchino BN. Social support and physical health: understanding the health consequences of relationships: Yale University Press; 2004.CrossRef
4.
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316.CrossRef
5.
Drogomyretska K, Fox R, Colbert D. Brief report: stress and perceived social support in parents of children with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020;50(11):4176–82.CrossRef
6.
Hetherington E, McDonald S, Williamson T, Patten SB, Tough SC. Social support and maternal mental health at 4 months and 1 year postpartum: analysis from the all our families cohort. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2018;72(10):933–9.CrossRef
7.
Gouin JP, Da Estrela C, Desmarais K, Barker ET. The impact of formal and informal support on health in the context of caregiving stress. Fam Relat. 2016;65(1):191–206.CrossRef
8.
Angley M, Divney A, Magriples U, Kershaw T. Social support, family functioning and parenting competence in adolescent parents. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(1):67–73.CrossRef
9.
Armstrong MI, Birnie-Lefcovitch S, Ungar MT. Pathways between social support, family well being, quality of parenting, and child resilience: what we know. J Child Fam Stud. 2005;14(2):269–81.CrossRef
10.
Bonds DD, Gondoli DM, Sturge-Apple ML, Salem LN. Parenting stress as a mediator of the relation between parenting support and optimal parenting. Parent: Sci and Prac. 2002;2(4):409–35.CrossRef
11.
Byrnes HF, Miller BA. The relationship between neighborhood characteristics and effective parenting behaviors: the role of social support. J Fam Issues. 2012;33(12):1658–87.CrossRef
12.
Dardas LA, Ahmad MM. Coping strategies as mediators and moderators between stress and quality of life among parents of children with autistic disorder. Stress Health. 2015;31(1):5–12.CrossRef
13.
McConnell D, Breitkreuz R, Savage A. From financial hardship to child difficulties: Main and moderating effects of perceived social support. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(5):679–91.CrossRef
14.
Östberg M, Hagekull B. A structural modeling approach to the understanding of parenting stress. J of Clin Child Psychol. 2000;29(4):615–25.CrossRef
15.
Riina EM, Lippert A, Brooks-Gunn J. Residential instability, family support, and parent–child relationships among ethnically diverse urban families. J Marriage Fam. 2016;78(4):855–70.CrossRef
16.
Taylor ZE, Conger RD, Robins RW, Widaman KF. Parenting practices and perceived social support: longitudinal relations with the social competence of Mexican-origin children. J of Lat/o Psychol. 2015;3(4):193.
17.
Green BL, Furrer C, McAllister C. How do relationships support parenting? Effects of attachment style and social support on parenting behavior in an at-risk population. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;40(1–2):96–108.CrossRef
18.
Knijn T, Hopman M. Parenting support in the Dutch ‘participation society’. Soc Policy Soc. 2015;14(4):645–56.CrossRef
19.
Daly M, Bray R. Parenting support in England: the bedding down of a new policy. Soc Policy Soc. 2015;14(4):633.CrossRef
20.
Kesselring MC. Partners in Parenting: a study on shared childrearing responsibilities between parents and nonparental adults: Utrecht University; 2016.
21.
Grassley JS. Adolescent mothers' breastfeeding social support needs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39(6):713–22.CrossRef
22.
Leahy-Warren P, McCarthy G, Corcoran P. First-time mothers: social support, maternal parental self-efficacy and postnatal depression. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(3–4):388–97.CrossRef
23.
Leahy-Warren P. First-time mothers: social support and confidence in infant care. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(5):479–88.CrossRef
24.
Östberg V, Lennartsson C. Getting by with a little help: the importance of various types of social support for health problems. Scan J of Pub Health. 2007;35(2):197–204.CrossRef
25.
Uchino BN. Understanding the links between social support and physical health: a life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4(3):236–55.CrossRef
26.
Harknett KS, Hartnett CS. Who lacks support and why? An examination of mothers' personal safety nets. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73(4):861–75.CrossRef
27.
Turney K, Harknett K. Neighborhood disadvantage, residential stability, and perceptions of instrumental support among new mothers. J Fam Issues. 2010;31(4):499–524.CrossRef
28.
Almeida J, Molnar BE, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV. Ethnicity and nativity status as determinants of perceived social support: testing the concept of familism. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(10):1852–8.CrossRef
29.
Harknett K, Knab J. More kin, less support: multipartnered fertility and perceived support among mothers. J Marriage Fam. 2007;69(1):237–53.CrossRef
30.
Harknett K. The relationship between private safety nets and economic outcomes among single mothers. J Marriage Fam. 2006;68(1):172–91.CrossRef
31.
Turney K, Kao G. Assessing the private safety net: social support among minority immigrant parents. Sociol Q. 2009;50(4):666–92.CrossRef
32.
Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41.CrossRef
33.
Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions: do they work? Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22(3):381–440.CrossRef
34.
Windhorst DA, Fang Y, Fierloos IN, Crone MR, Van Mourik K, Jonkman H, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of (elements of) parenting support in daily practice of preventive youth health care; design of a naturalistic effect evaluation in ‘CIKEO’(consortium integration knowledge promotion effectiveness of parenting interventions). BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–9.CrossRef
35.
Pedersen SS, Spinder H, Erdman RAM, Denollet J. Poor perceived social support in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients and their partners: cross-validation of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(5):461–7.CrossRef
36.
Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1990;55(3–4):610–7.CrossRef
37.
Osman A, Lamis DA, Freedenthal S, Gutierrez PM, McNaughton-Cassill M. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: analyses of internal reliability, measurement invariance, and correlates across gender. J Pers Assess. 2014;96(1):103–12.CrossRef
38.
Aroian K, Templin TN, Ramaswamy V. Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support for Arab immigrant women. Health Care for Women Intern. 2010;31(2):153–69.CrossRef
39.
Wang D, Zhu F, Xi S, Niu L, Tebes JK, Xiao S, et al. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) among family caregivers of people with schizophrenia in China. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1201.CrossRef
40.
41.
UNESCO INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS. International standard classification of education: ISCED 2011. Comparative Social Research, 2012, 30.
42.
Yang-Huang J, van Grieken A, Wang L, Jansen W, Raat H. Clustering of sedentary Behaviours, physical activity, and energy-dense food intake in six-year-old children: associations with family socioeconomic status. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1722.CrossRef
43.
44.
Haslam DM, Tee A, Baker S. The use of social media as a mechanism of social support in parents. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(7):2026–37.CrossRef
45.
Respler-Herman M, Mowder BA, Yasik AE, Shamah R. Parenting beliefs, parental stress, and social support relationships. J Child Fam Stud. 2012;21(2):190–8.CrossRef
46.
Shields MA, Price SW. Exploring the economic and social determinants of psychological well-being and perceived social support in England. J of the Royal Stat Soc: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2005;168(3):513–37.CrossRef
47.
Dalgard OS, Dowrick C, Lehtinen V, Vazquez-Barquero JL, Casey P, Wilkinson G, et al. Negative life events, social support and gender difference in depression. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(6):444–51.CrossRef
48.
Sonnenberg CM, Deeg DJH, Van Tilburg TG, Vink D, Stek ML, Beekman ATF. Gender differences in the relation between depression and social support in later life. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(1):61–70.CrossRef
49.
Henly JR, Danziger SK, Offer S. The contribution of social support to the material well-being of low-income families. J Marriage Fam. 2005;67(1):122–40.CrossRef
50.
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(1):415–44.CrossRef
51.
Dominguez S, Watkins C. Creating networks for survival and mobility: social capital among African-American and Latin-American low-income mothers. Soc Probl. 2003;50(1):111–35.CrossRef
52.
Böhnke P. Are the poor socially integrated? The link between poverty and social support in different welfare regimes. J Eur Soc Policy. 2008;18(2):133–50.CrossRef
53.
Marks NF, McLanahan SS. Gender, family structure, and social support among parents. J Marriage Fam. 1993;55(2):481.CrossRef
54.
Ager A, Strang A. Understanding integration: a conceptual framework. J Refug Stud. 2008;21(2):166–91.CrossRef
55.
Negron R, Martin A, Almog M, Balbierz A, Howell EA. Social support during the postpartum period: mothers’ views on needs, expectations, and mobilization of support. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(4):616–23.CrossRef
56.
Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, de Lacey S. Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(3):498–501.CrossRef
57.
58.
Brand G, Morrison P, Down B. How do health professionals support pregnant and young mothers in the community? A selective review of the research literature. Women and Birth. 2014;27(3):174–8.CrossRef
59.
Webster-Stratton C. From parent training to community building. Fam Soc. 1997;78(2):156–71.CrossRef
60.
Cutrona CE. Social support principles for strengthening families. In: Canavan J, Dolan P, Pinkerton J, editors. Family support: Direction from diversity. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2000, p. 103–122.
61.
Thompson RA. Social support and child protection: lessons learned and learning. Child Abuse Negl. 2015;41:19–29.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Socio-demographic characteristics associated with perceived social support among parents of children aged 0–7 years: the CIKEO study
Authors
Irene N. Fierloos
Dafna A. Windhorst
Yuan Fang
Harrie Jonkman
Matty R. Crone
Clemens M. H. Hosman
Siok Swan Tan
Hein Raat
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14830-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research

The impact of new government childcare accreditation standards on children’s in-care physical activity and sedentary time

Research

Adolescent mobile phone addiction during the COVID-19 pandemic predicts subsequent suicide risk: a two-wave longitudinal study

Research article

Participation in primary health care through community-level health committees in Sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative synthesis

Research

The impact of an unemployment insurance reform on incidence rates of hospitalisation due to alcohol-related disorders: a quasi-experimental study of heterogeneous effects across ethnic background, educational level, employment status, and sex in Sweden

Research

Respiratory health among adolescents living in the Highveld Air Pollution Priority Area in South Africa

Research

Association between maternal fermented food consumption and child sleep duration at the age of 3 years: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study