Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Social support, family resilience and psychological resilience among maintenance hemodialysis patients: a longitudinal study

Authors: Yuxin Wang, Yuan Qiu, Liya Ren, Hao Jiang, Meijia Chen, Chaoqun Dong

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Psychological distress is common in maintenance hemodialysis patients, and high psychological resilience can promote psychological well-being. The current research focuses on psychological resilience protective factors such as family resilience and social support. However, the trajectories of psychological resilience, family resilience, and social support over time and their longitudinal relationships in maintenance hemodialysis patients have not been fully explored yet. Therefore, this study aims to explore the longitudinal relationship between these factors.

Methods

Patients who received regular hemodialysis treatment for more than three months at dialysis centers of three tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang, China, were recruited from September to December 2020. A total of 252 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria completed three follow-up surveys, including social support, family resilience, and psychological resilience assessments. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to explore differences in their respective scores at different time points. The cross-lagged analysis was performed in AMOS using the maximum likelihood method to examine the the reciprocal predictive relationships between these factors.

Results

Social support and psychological resilience remained relatively stable over time, whereas family resilience indicated a little increasing trend. According to the cross-lagged analysis, higher T1 social support predicted higher family resilience at T2 [β = 0.123, 95% CI (0.026–0.244)]. Further, the effects of T2 social support to T3 family resilience [β = 0.194, 95%CI (0.039–0.335)] and psychological resilience [β = 0.205, 95%CI (0.049–0.354)] were significant. Finally, the effects of T2 family resilience to T3 social support [β = 0.122, 95%CI (0.010–0.225)] and psychological resilience [β = 0.244, 95%CI (0.119–0.359)] were also significant.

Conclusions

The study showed that the directionality of the relationship appears to be from social support or family resilience to patients’ psychological resilience but not vice versa. This finding reminds healthcare professionals to emphasize the vital role of social and family resources in providing appropriate support and interventions for maintenance hemodialysis patients to promote psychological resilience and mental health development.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Foote C, Kotwal S, Gallagher M, Cass A, Brown M, Jardine M. Survival outcomes of supportive care versus dialysis therapies for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol (Carlton). 2016;21(3):241–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12586.CrossRef Foote C, Kotwal S, Gallagher M, Cass A, Brown M, Jardine M. Survival outcomes of supportive care versus dialysis therapies for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol (Carlton). 2016;21(3):241–53. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​nep.​12586.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference García-Martínez P, Ballester-Arnal R, Gandhi-Morar K, Castro-Calvo J, Gea-Caballero V, Juárez-Vela R, et al. Perceived stress in relation to quality of life and resilience in patients with advanced chronic kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020536. García-Martínez P, Ballester-Arnal R, Gandhi-Morar K, Castro-Calvo J, Gea-Caballero V, Juárez-Vela R, et al. Perceived stress in relation to quality of life and resilience in patients with advanced chronic kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ijerph18020536.
37.
go back to reference Boomsma A. The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation models. Boomsma A, editor. In: Cuttance P, Ecob R, editors. Structural modeling by example: applications in educational, sociological, and behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. pp. 160–88. Boomsma A. The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation models. Boomsma A, editor. In: Cuttance P, Ecob R, editors. Structural modeling by example: applications in educational, sociological, and behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. pp. 160–88.
44.
go back to reference Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing. Kline P. editor: Routledge; 2013. Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing. Kline P. editor: Routledge; 2013.
45.
go back to reference Norman E. Resiliency enhancement: putting the strength perspective into social work practice. Norman E. editor: Columbia university press; 2000. Norman E. Resiliency enhancement: putting the strength perspective into social work practice. Norman E. editor: Columbia university press; 2000.
56.
go back to reference Axelson LJ, Mccubbin HI, Cauble AE, Patterson JM. Family stress, coping and Social Support. Fam Relat. 1982;32(3):452.CrossRef Axelson LJ, Mccubbin HI, Cauble AE, Patterson JM. Family stress, coping and Social Support. Fam Relat. 1982;32(3):452.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Social support, family resilience and psychological resilience among maintenance hemodialysis patients: a longitudinal study
Authors
Yuxin Wang
Yuan Qiu
Liya Ren
Hao Jiang
Meijia Chen
Chaoqun Dong
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05526-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Psychiatry 1/2024 Go to the issue