Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals

Authors: Edin Smailhodzic, Wyanda Hooijsma, Albert Boonstra, David J. Langley

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since the emergence of social media in 2004, a growing percentage of patients use this technology for health related reasons. To reflect on the alleged beneficial and potentially harmful effects of social media use by patients, the aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the extant literature on the effects of social media use for health related reasons on patients and their relationship with healthcare professionals.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review on empirical research regarding the effects of social media use by patients for health related reasons. The papers we included met the following selection criteria: (1) published in a peer-reviewed journal, (2) written in English, (3) full text available to the researcher, (4) contain primary empirical data, (5) the users of social media are patients, (6) the effects of patients using social media are clearly stated, (7) satisfy established quality criteria.

Results

Initially, a total of 1,743 articles were identified from which 22 were included in the study. From these articles six categories of patients’ use of social media were identified, namely: emotional, information, esteem, network support, social comparison and emotional expression. The types of use were found to lead to seven identified types of effects on patients, namely improved self-management and control, enhanced psychological well-being, and enhanced subjective well-being, diminished subjective well-being, addiction to social media, loss of privacy, and being targeted for promotion. Social media use by patients was found to affect the healthcare professional and patient relationship, by leading to more equal communication between the patient and healthcare professional, increased switching of doctors, harmonious relationships, and suboptimal interaction between the patient and healthcare professional.

Conclusions

Our review provides insights into the emerging utilization of social media in healthcare. In particular, it identifies types of use by patients as well as the effects of such use, which may differ between patients and doctors. Accordingly, our results framework and propositions can serve to guide future research, and they also have practical implications for healthcare providers and policy makers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Rupert DJ, Moultrie RR, Read JG, Amoozegar JB, Bornkessel AS, Donoghue AC, Sullivan HW. Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):320–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
McCaughey D, Baumgardner C, Gaudes A, LaRochelle D, Jiaxin K, Wu KJ, Raichura T. Best practices in social media: Utilizing a value matrix to assess social media’s impact on health care. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2014;32(5):575–89.CrossRef
4.
Williams J. A new roadmap for healthcare business success. J Healthc Financ Manage Assoc. 2011;65(5):62–9.
5.
Li C, Bernoff J. Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2008.
6.
Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff. 2009;28(2):361–8.CrossRef
7.
Carter M. Medicine and the media: How Twitter may have helped Nigeria contain Ebola. Br Med J. 2014;349.
8.
Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: Motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):426–31.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horiz. 2010;53:59–68.CrossRef
10.
11.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3(3):123–30.
12.
Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Herit Found Med Res. 2004;13:1–22.
13.
Broom A. The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity, and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. J Sociol. 2005;41(1):87–104.CrossRef
14.
Wentzer HS, Bygholm A. Narratives of empowerment and compliance: Studies of communication in online patient support groups. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(12):386.CrossRef
15.
Colineau N, Paris C. Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients. New Rev Hypermed Multimed. 2010;16(1):141–60.CrossRef
16.
Gómez-Zúñiga B, Fernandez-Luque L, Pousada M, Hernández-Encuentra E, Armayones M. ePatients on YouTube: Analysis of four experiences from the patients’ perspective. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2):26.CrossRef
17.
Kofinas JD, Varrey A, Sapra KJ, Kanj RV, Chervenak FA, Asfaw T. Adjunctive social media for more effective contraceptive counseling. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):763–70.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS. The health-related functions of social support. J Behav Med. 1981;4(4):381–406.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH. Social support measurement and intervention: a guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford; 2000.CrossRef
20.
Mattson M, Hall JG. Health as communication nexus: A service-learning approach. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt; 2011.
21.
Menon IS, Sharma MK, Chandra PS, Thennarasu K. Social networking sites: An adjunctive treatment modality for psychological problems. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36(3):260–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, Van de Laar M. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2):18.CrossRef
23.
Bartlett YK, Coulson NS. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(1):113–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Chiu YC, Hsieh YL. Communication online with fellow cancer patients: Writing to be remembered, gain strength, and find survivors. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(12):1572–81.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Coulson NS. How do online patient support communities affect the experience of inflammatory bowel disease? An online survey. JRSM Short Reports. 2013;4:1–8.CrossRef
26.
Setoyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Namayama K. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: Differences between lurkers and posters. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):122.CrossRef
27.
Bers MU, Beals LM, Chau C, Satoh K, Blume ED, DeMaso DR, Gonzalez-Heydrich J. Use of a virtual community as a psychosocial support system in pediatric transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2010;14(2):261–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Frost JH, Massagli MP. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another’s data. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):15.CrossRef
29.
30.
Oh HJ, Lee B. The effect of computer-mediated social support in online communities on patient empowerment and doctor–patient communication. Health Commun. 2012;27(1):30–41.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Sahoo FM, Mohapatra L. Psychological well-Being in professional groups. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol. 2009;35(2):211–7.
32.
Chen FF, Jing Y, Hayes A, Lee JM. Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2013;14(3):1033–68.CrossRef
33.
Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069–81.CrossRef
34.
Bauer R, Bauer M, Spiessl H, Kagerbauer T. Cyber-support: An analysis of online self-help forums (online self-help forums in bipolar disorder). Nordic J Psychiatry. 2013;67(3):185–90.CrossRef
35.
Malik S, Coulson NS. ‘They all supported me but I felt like I suddenly didn’t belong anymore’: An exploration of perceived disadvantages to online support seeking. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2010;31(3):140–9.CrossRef
36.
Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J, Brownstein C, Okun S, Vaughan T, Bradley R, Heywood J. Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):19.CrossRef
37.
Lee YC, Wu WL. The effects of situated learning and health knowledge involvement on health communications. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):220–33.CrossRef
38.
Kim S, Yoon JW. The use of an online forum for health information by married Korean women in the United States. Inf Res. 2012;17(2):514.
39.
Pagoto S, Schneider KL, Evans M, Waring ME, Appelhans B, Busch AM, Whited MC, Thind H, Ziedonis M. Tweeting it off: Characteristics of adults who tweet about a weight loss attempt. J Am Med Infor Assoc. 2014;21(6):1032–7.CrossRef
40.
Farber BA, Nitzburg GC. Young adult self-disclosures in psychotherapy and on Facebook. Couns Psychol Q. 2015;29(1):1–14.
41.
Magliano L, Marasco C, Fiorillo A, Malangone C, Guarneri M, Maj M. The impact of professional and social network support on the burden of families of patients with schizophrenia in Italy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106(4):291–8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Blickem C, Kennedy A, Vassilev I, Morris R, Brooks H, Jariwala P, Blakeman T, Rogers A. “Linking people with long‐term health conditions to healthy community activities: development of Patient‐Led Assessment for Network Support (PLANS). Health Expect. 2013;16(3):48–59.CrossRef
43.
Steinfeld C, Ellison NB, Lampe C. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2008;29(6):434–45.CrossRef
44.
Osatuyi B. Is lurking an anxiety-masking strategy on social media sites? The effects of lurking and computer anxiety on explaining information privacy concern on social media platforms. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;49:324–32.CrossRef
45.
Tobin SJ, Vanman EJ, Verreynne M, Saeri AK. Threats to belonging on Facebook: Lurking and ostracism. Soc Influ. 2015;10(1):31–42.CrossRef
46.
Boniel-Nissim M, Barak A. The therapeutic value of adolescents’ blogging about social–emotional difficulties. Psychol Serv. 2013;10(3):333–41.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Feste C, Anderson RM. Empowerment: from philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26(1):139–44.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Angaran DM. Telemedicine and telepharmacy: current status and future implications. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56(14):1405–26.PubMed
49.
Markus ML. Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Commun ACM. 1983;26(6):430–44.CrossRef
50.
Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Holmström I, Röing M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(2):167–72.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Simon HA. Decision and organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing; 1972.
53.
Bletsos K, Alexias G, Tsekeris C. Towards a fourth cosmology of doctor-patient relationship: a reflection on the virtual patient community PatientsLikeMe. Open Access J Glob Sustain Infor Soc. 2013;11(1):136–44.
Metadata
Title
Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals
Authors
Edin Smailhodzic
Wyanda Hooijsma
Albert Boonstra
David J. Langley
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Leveraging quality improvement through use of the Systems Assessment Tool in Indigenous primary health care services: a mixed methods study

Research article

Long-term costs of colorectal cancer treatment in Spain

Research article

Mandating influenza vaccinations for health care workers: analysing opportunities for policy change using Kingdon’s agenda setting framework

Research article

Commonalities and differences in the implementation of models of care for arthritis: key informant interviews from Canada

Study protocol

Intervention to Improve Quality of life for African-AmericaN lupus patients (IQAN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a unique a la carte intervention approach to self-management of lupus in African Americans

Research article

Systematic review of factors influencing length of stay in ICU after adult cardiac surgery