Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Recent Developments

Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff

Author: Bernadette J. Richards

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

A recent development of a different kind than usually covered here is the emergent voice of social media and social activism and the role it plays in the judicial process where there is conflict over the treatment of a child. The legal position is that, at all times, the best interests of the child must be the focus of all debate but attention is increasingly being diverted to the management of large scale social media campaigns and the clamor of voices (including those of the President of the United States, the Pope, and the Italian Ambassador to the United Kingdom). The result being that the realities of the condition of the vulnerable child at the heart of the debate pales in the face of emotional rhetoric. …
Literature
go back to reference Hammond-Browning, N. 2017. When doctors and parents don’t agree: The story of Charlie Gard. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(4): 461–468.CrossRef Hammond-Browning, N. 2017. When doctors and parents don’t agree: The story of Charlie Gard. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(4): 461–468.CrossRef
go back to reference Okninski, M. 2016. Determining a child’s best interests when parents refuse medical treatment—CAHS v Kiszko & Anor [2016] FCWA. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(3): 364–368.CrossRef Okninski, M. 2016. Determining a child’s best interests when parents refuse medical treatment—CAHS v Kiszko & Anor [2016] FCWA. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(3): 364–368.CrossRef
go back to reference Okninski, M., and B. Richards. 2016. Regulating “quack” medicine and decision-making for children re-visited. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(4): 467–471.CrossRef Okninski, M., and B. Richards. 2016. Regulating “quack” medicine and decision-making for children re-visited. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(4): 467–471.CrossRef
go back to reference ———, 2017. Considering professional misconduct and best interests of a child (palliative orders). Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(1): 19–22.CrossRef ———, 2017. Considering professional misconduct and best interests of a child (palliative orders). Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(1): 19–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff
Author
Bernadette J. Richards
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9872-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2018 Go to the issue

Symposium: Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy

One For All, All For One? Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy