Top

Osteoporosis International

Published in:

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Social inequality and fractures—secular trends in the Danish population: a case-control study

Authors: L. Hansen, A. Judge, M.K. Javaid, C. Cooper, P. Vestergaard, B. Abrahamsen, N.C. Harvey

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 10/2018

Abstract

Summary

We examined links between markers of social inequality and fracture risk in the Danish population, demonstrating that high income and being married are associated with a significantly lower risk.

Introduction

We explored whether the risk of hip, humerus, and wrist fracture was associated with markers of inequality using data from Danish health registries.

Methods

All patients 50 years or older with a primary hip (ICD10 S720, S721, S722, and S729) humerus (ICD10 S422, S423, S424, S425, S426, and S427), or wrist (ICD10: S52) fracture were identified from 1/1/1995 to 31/12/2011. Fracture patients were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and year of fracture, to a non-fracture control. Markers of inequality were as follows: income (fifths); marital status (married, divorced, widowed, or unmarried); area of residence (remote, rural, intermediate, or urban). Conditional logistic regression was used to investigate associations between these exposures, and risk of fracture, adjusting for covariates (smoking, alcohol, and Charlson co-morbidity). Interactions were fitted between exposure and covariates where appropriate.

Results

A total of 189,838 fracture patients (37,500 hip, 45,602 humerus, and 106,736 wrist) and 189,838 controls were included. Mean age was 73.9 years (hip), 67.5 years (humerus), and 65.3 years (wrist). High income (5th quintile) was significantly associated with a lower odds ratio of all three fractures, compared to average income (3rd quintile). Married subjects had a significantly decreased odds ratio across all three fractures. However, no overall secular difference was observed regarding the influence of the markers of inequality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated important, stable associations between social inequality, assessed using income, marital status, and area of residence, and fracture at the population level. These findings can inform approaches to healthcare, and suggest that much thought should be given to novel interventions aimed especially at those living alone, and ideally societal measures to reduce social inequality.

Available only for authorised users

Hansen L, Petersen KD, Eriksen SA et al (2014) Subsequent fracture rates in a nationwide population-based cohort study with a 10-year perspective. Osteoporos Int 26:513–519CrossRef

Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Center JR, Emaus N, Tell GS, Schei B, Tverdal A, Gjesdal CG, Grimnes G, Forsmo S, Eisman JA, Søgaard AJ (2012) Hip fractures in Norway 1999–2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates. a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 27:807–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9711-9 CrossRefPubMed

Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT (2015) The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 7:449–490CrossRef

Ryg J, Rejnmark L, Overgaard S, Brixen K, Vestergaard P (2009) Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study of 169,145 cases during 1977–2001. J Bone Min Res 24:1299–1307CrossRef

Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 301:513–521CrossRef

Si L, Winzenberg TM, de Graaff B, Palmer AJ (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions. Osteoporos Int 25:1987–1997CrossRef

Abrahamsen B, Brask-Lindemann D, Rubin KH et al (2014) A review of lifestyle, smoking and other modifiable risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Bonekey Rep 3:574CrossRef

Graham H (2004) Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings. Milbank Q 82:101–124CrossRef

Baker E, Metzler M, Galea S (2005) Addressing social determinants of health disparities: learning from doing. Am J Public Health 95:553–556CrossRef

10.

Omsland TK, Eisman JA, Naess Ø et al (2015) Educational inequalities in post-hip fracture mortality: a NOREPOS Studys. J bone Miner Res 30:2221–2228, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26085117 CrossRef

11.

Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2006) Socioeconomic aspects of fractures within universal public healthcare: a nationwide case-control study from Denmark. Scand J Public Health 34:371–377CrossRef

12.

Farahmand P, Persson PG, Michaelsson K et al (2000) Socioeconomic status, marital status and hip fracture risk: a population-based case-control study. Osteoporos Int 11:803–808CrossRef

13.

Peel NM, McClure RJ, Hendrikz JK (2007) Psychosocial factors associated with fall-related hip fractures. Age Ageing 36:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl167 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Velfærdsministeriet, Ministeriet for Fødevarer Landbrug og Fiskeri. Landdistriktsredegørelse 2009. København K, 2009

15.

Thvilum M, Brandt F, Almind D, Christensen K, Hegedüs L, Brix TH (2013) Excess mortality in patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism: a nationwide cohort study of singletons and twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:1069–1075, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365121 CrossRef

16.

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef

17.

Wilson RT, Chase GA, Chrischilles EA et al (2006) Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators. Am J Public Health 96:1210–1218CrossRef

18.

Curtis EM, van der Velde R, Moon RJ et al (2016) Epidemiology of fractures in the United Kingdom 1988–2012: variation with age, sex, geography, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Bone 87:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.03.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, et al. (2007) Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford University Press

20.

Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson ANA, Melton LJ et al (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0559-5 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Curtis JR, McClure LA, Delzell E et al (2009) Population-based fracture risk assessment and osteoporosis treatment disparities by race and gender. J Gen Intern Med 24:956–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1031-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Brennan SL, Pasco JA, Urquhart DM et al (2009) The association between socioeconomic status and osteoporotic fracture in population-based adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 20:1487–1497CrossRef

23.

Thygesen LC, Ersbøll AK (2014) When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 1–8

Title: Social inequality and fractures—secular trends in the Danish population: a case-control study
Authors: L. Hansen
A. Judge
M.K. Javaid
C. Cooper
P. Vestergaard
B. Abrahamsen
N.C. Harvey
Publication date: 01-10-2018
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: Osteoporosis International / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4603-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Social inequality and fractures—secular trends in the Danish population: a case-control study

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

FGF23-klotho axis, bone fractures, and arterial stiffness in dialysis: a case-control study

Relationship of American Indian blood quantum with osteoporosis risk: a cross-sectional study of American Indian women in Oklahoma

Progression of frailty and prevalence of osteoporosis in a community cohort of older women—a 10-year longitudinal study

Maximal strength training improves musculoskeletal health in amphetamine users in clinical treatment

The Forteo Patient Registry linkage to multiple state cancer registries: study design and results from the first 8 years

Antihistamine use and the risk of injurious falls or fracture in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis