Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Smoking prevalence and attributable deaths in Thailand: predicting outcomes of different tobacco control interventions

Authors: Suchunya Aungkulanon, Siriwan Pitayarangsarit, Kanitta Bundhamcharoen, Chutima Akaleephan, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong, Ratsida Phoncharoen, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite substantial positive impacts of Thailand’s tobacco control policies on reducing the prevalence of smoking, current trends suggest that further reductions are needed to ensure that WHO’s 2025 voluntary global target of a 30% relative reduction in tobacco use is met. In order to confirm this hypothesis, we aim to estimate the effect of tobacco control policies in Thailand on the prevalence of smoking and attributed deaths and assess the possibilities of achieving WHO’s 2025 global target. This paper addresses this knowledge gap which will contribute to policy control measures on tobacco control. Results of this study can help guide policy makers in implementing further interventions to reduce the prevalence of smoking in Thailand.

Method

A Markov chain model was developed to examine the effect of tobacco control policies, such as accessibility restrictions for youths, increased tobacco taxes and promotion of smoking cessation programs, from 2015 to 2025. Outcomes included smoking prevalence and the number of smoking-attributable deaths. Due to the very low prevalence of female smokers in 2014, this study applied the model to estimate the smoking prevalence and attributable mortality among males only.

Results

Given that the baseline prevalence of smoking in 2010 was 41.7% in males, the target of a 30% relative reduction requires that the prevalence be reduced to 29.2% by 2025. Under a baseline scenario where smoking initiation and cessation rates among males are attained by 2015, smoking prevalence rates will reduce to 37.8% in 2025. The combined tobacco control policies would further reduce the prevalence to 33.7% in 2025 and 89,600 deaths would be averted.

Conclusion

Current tobacco control policies will substantially reduce the smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The combined interventions can reduce the smoking prevalence by 19% relative to the 2010 level. These projected reductions are insufficient to achieve the committed target of a 30% relative reduction in smoking by 2025. Increased efforts to control tobacco use will be essential for reducing the burden of non-communicable diseases in Thailand.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Assembly UG. Political declaration of the high-level meeting of the general assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. New York: United Nations; 2011.
2.
Kontis V, Mathers CD, Rehm J, et al. Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25x25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: a modelling study. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):427–37.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Bonita R, Magnusson R, Bovet P, et al. Country actions to meet UN commitments on non-communicable diseases: a stepwise approach. Lancet. 2013;381(9866):575–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
5.
Alwan A. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
6.
Burden of Disease Thailand. Thailand burden of diseases attributable to risk factors 2014. Nonthaburi: International Health Policy Program; 2017.
7.
Bundhamcharoen K, Aungkulanon S, Makka N, Shibuya K. Economic burden from smoking-related diseases in Thailand. Tob Control. 2016;25(5):532–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Vathesatogkit P, Charoenca N. Tobacco control: lessons learnt in Thailand. Indian J Public Health. 2011;55(3):228–33.PubMedCrossRef
9.
National Statistical Office. The smoking and drinking behavior survey 2017. Bangkok: National Statistical Office; 2017.
10.
Sangthong R, Wichaidit W, Ketchoo C. Current situation and future challenges of tobacco control policy in Thailand. Tob Control. 2012;21(1):49–54.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Lee G, Lee J, Lee S. Risk factors of future smoking among Thai youth: a secondary analysis of the Thai global youth tobacco survey. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP2602–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Lim A, McNeil D. Modeling for demographic and regional prevalence and trends of smoking in Thai males. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2016;47(2):309–17.PubMed
13.
Chotbenjamaporn P, Haruhansapong V, Jumriangrit P, Pitayarangsarit S, Agarwal N, Garg R. Tobacco use among thai students: results from the 2015 global youth tobacco survey. Indian J Public Health. 2017;61(Suppl 1):S40–6.PubMed
14.
2018 Global progress report on implementation of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva: World Health Organization;2018.
15.
Levy DT, Benjakul S, Ross H, Ritthiphakdee B. The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in a middle income nation: results from the Thailand SimSmoke simulation model. Tob Control. 2008;17(1):53–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
18.
Sirirassamee T, Sirirassamee B. Trends in tobacco use among Thai adolescents. J Med Assoc Thail. 2013;96(Suppl 1):S78–84.
19.
DiFranza JR. Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking? Tob Control. 2012;21(4):436–42.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Pierce JP, White VM, Emery SL. What public health strategies are needed to reduce smoking initiation? Tob Control. 2012;21(2):258–64.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):172–80.PubMedCrossRef
22.
US Department of Health Human Services. Reducing tobacco use: a report of the surgeon general.(2000). Atlanta, Georgia, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on smoking and health Google scholar. 2000.
23.
DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Mathios A. Cigarette taxes and the transition from youth to adult smoking: smoking initiation, cessation, and participation. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):904–17.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Chaloupka FJ, Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK. Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies. Tob Control. 2002;11(Suppl 1):I62–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Husain MJ, Kostova D, Mbulo L, Benjakul S, Kengganpanich M, Andes L. Changes in cigarette prices, affordability, and brand-tier consumption after a tobacco tax increase in Thailand: evidence from the global adult tobacco surveys, 2009 and 2011. Prev Med. 2017;105(Suppl):S4–S9.CrossRef
26.
Abrams DB, Graham AL, Levy DT, Mabry PL, Orleans CT. Boosting population quits through evidence-based cessation treatment and policy. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3 Suppl):S351–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Cummins SE, Bailey L, Campbell S, Koon-Kirby C, Zhu SH. Tobacco cessation quitlines in North America: a descriptive study. Tob Control. 2007;16(Suppl 1):i9–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Abrams DB. Comprehensive smoking cessation policy for all smokers: systems integration to save lives and money. In: Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation; 2007. p. A1–A45.
29.
Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker T, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
30.
Borland R, Li L, Driezen P, et al. Cessation assistance reported by smokers in 15 countries participating in the international tobacco control (ITC) policy evaluation surveys. Addiction. 2012;107(1):197–205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R, Lancaster T. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD002850.
32.
Meeyai A, Yunibhand J, Punkrajang P, Pitayarangsarit S. An evaluation of usage patterns, effectiveness and cost of the national smoking cessation quitline in Thailand. Tob Control. 2015;24(5):481–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Edwards NM, Solberg LI. Greater use of preventive services in U.S. health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(9):1656–60.CrossRef
34.
Stead LF, Buitrago D, Preciado N, Sanchez G, Hartmann-Boyce J, Lancaster T. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5.
35.
36.
World Health Organization. WHO global report on trends in tobacco smoking 2000–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
37.
38.
White JS, Ross H. Smokers’ strategic responses to sin taxes: evidence from panel data in Thailand. Health Econ. 2015;24(2):127–41.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Smith KE, Savell E, Gilmore AB. What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies. Tob Control. 2013;22(2):144–53.PubMedCrossRef
40.
WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. Tax policies on tobacco products in Thailand: the way forward. Geneva: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2012.
41.
National Health Security Office. The National Health Security Annual Report [in Thai]. Geneva: National Health Security Office; 2018.
42.
43.
Hill S, Amos A, Clifford D, Platt S. Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence. Tob Control. 2014;23(e2):e89–97.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Smoking prevalence and attributable deaths in Thailand: predicting outcomes of different tobacco control interventions
Authors
Suchunya Aungkulanon
Siriwan Pitayarangsarit
Kanitta Bundhamcharoen
Chutima Akaleephan
Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong
Ratsida Phoncharoen
Viroj Tangcharoensathien
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7332-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Students growing up with a chronically ill family member; a survey on experienced consequences, background characteristics, and risk factors

Research article

Adherence to antiretroviral treatment and associated factors among people living with HIV and AIDS in CHITWAN, Nepal

Research article

Meningococcal disease in Italy: public concern, media coverage and policy change

Research article

Challenges and perceptions of implementing mass testing, treatment and tracking in malaria control: a qualitative study in Pakro sub-district of Ghana

Research article

Coverage and usage of insecticide treated nets (ITNs) within households: associated factors and effect on the prevalance of malaria parasitemia in the Mount Cameroon area

Research article

Geographic disparities and temporal changes in risk of death from myocardial infarction in Florida, 2000–2014