Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Smoking and Nicotine Detoxification | Research

Smoking cessation aids and strategies: a population-based survey of former and current smokers in Norway

Authors: Marianne Lund, Ingeborg Lund

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Abstract

Background

In Norway, tobacco consumption is equally divided between combustible (cigarettes) and non-combustible (snus) tobacco. In the process of quitting, people who smoke can choose between several smoking cessation aids and strategies based on what is available on the market or what are recommended as cessation aids. A quit attempt may be planned or unplanned and consist of a gradual decline in consumption or an abrupt quitting. This study explores smoking cessation aids and strategies used at the latest quit attempt among people who have ever smoked. How prevalent is the use of various cessation aids and strategies, and do they correlate with each other? Are there any differences in successful quits depending on the use of a specific cessation aid or strategy?

Method

We used repeated cross-sectional representative surveys in Norway for 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. The analytic sample consists of people aged 20 years or older who have ever smoked daily, more precisely current daily smokers with at least one quit attempt (n = 476), and former daily smokers who quit in 2012 or later (n = 397). Participants answered questions on cessation aids and strategies used at their last quit attempt. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations between cessation aids and strategies and sociodemographic and smoking-related variables and successful quit attempts.

Results

Fifty-six percent of people who ever smoked daily reported any use of cessation aids, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), snus and e-cigarettes were the most commonly used cessation aids. Snus and web/mobile use was associated with successful quits, while NRT was associated with unsuccessful quit attempts. When exclusive use was separated from the combined use of several aids, only snus was associated with successful quits.

Conclusion

Snus use was found to be a “stand-alone” cessation aid, and only weakly associated with the use of other cessation aids. Further investigation of cessation aid preferences is needed, especially among smokers with little or no contact with health services and/or for whom traditional cessation aids have no appeal.

Statistics Norway. 15 prosent av befolkningen snuser daglig [15% of population uses snus daily]. 2022. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/helse/helseforhold-og-levevaner/statistikk/royk-alkohol-og-andre-rusmidler/artikler/15-prosent-av-befolkningen-snuser-daglig [cited 07.03.2022].

Kvaavik E. Tobakk i Norge [tobacco in Norway]. Norway: Oslo; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2582061

Lund I, Lund KE. How has the availability of Snus influenced cigarette smoking in Norway? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111705.

Lund KE, Scheffels J, McNeill A. The association between use of snus and quit rates for smoking: results from seven Norwegian cross-sectional studies. Addiction. 2011;106(1):162–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03122.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lund K. Tobacco harm reduction in the real world: has the availability of snus in Norway increased smoking cessation? Drugs Alcohol Today. 2013;13(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-02-2013-0006.

Lund I, Christiansen SG. Association between snus use over time and smoking cessation in Norwegian smokers. Addiction. 2020;115(1):170–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14809.CrossRefPubMed

Ramström L, Borland R, Wikmans T. Patterns of smoking and snus use in Sweden: implications for public health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111110.

Filippidis FT, et al. Changes in smoking cessation assistance in the European Union between 2012 and 2017: pharmacotherapy versus counselling versus e-cigarettes. Tob Control. 2019;28(1):95. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054117.CrossRefPubMed

Benmarhnia T, et al. Can E-cigarettes and pharmaceutical aids increase smoking cessation and reduce cigarette consumption? Findings from a nationally representative cohort of American smokers. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(11):2397–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub4.

11.

Chan GCK, et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2021;119:106912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106912.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Grabovac I, et al. Effectiveness of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(4):625–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa181.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Smith KM, et al. E-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement treatment as harm reduction interventions for smokers who find quitting difficult: randomised controlled trial. Addiction. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15628.

14.

Jackson SE, et al. Moderators of real-world effectiveness of smoking cessation aids: a population study. Addiction. 2019;114(9):1627–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14656.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Beard E, et al. Population level predictors of changes in success rates of smoking quit attempts in England: a time series analysis. Addiction. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14837.

16.

McDermott MS, et al. The effectiveness of using e-cigarettes for quitting smoking compared to other cessation methods among adults in the United Kingdom. Addiction. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15474.

17.

Glasser AM, et al. Patterns of E-cigarette use and subsequent cigarette smoking cessation over 2 years (2013/2014–2015/2016) in the population assessment of tobacco and health study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;23(4):669–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa182.CrossRefPubMedCentral

18.

Joossens L, Feliu A, Fernandez E. The tobacco control scale 2019 in Europe. 2020. http://www.tobaccocontrolscale.org/TCS2019.pdf.

19.

Norwegian Directorate of Health. Snus and smoking cessation aid [Hjelp til snus og røykeslutt]. www.helsenorge.no, 2021; Available from: https://www.helsenorge.no/snus-og-roykeslutt/fa-hjelp-til-a-slutte-med-app-chat-og-pa-nett/#slutta-%E2%80%93-en-app-for-%C3%A5-slutte-med-r%C3%B8yk-og-snus. [cited 08.11.2021]

20.

Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2011, updated 2019). Veileder for kommunale frisklivssentraler. Etablering, organisering og tilbud. [Guiding document for municipal health promotion centers].

21.

Tan J, Zhao L, Chen H. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of gradual versus abrupt smoking cessation. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:09. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/100557.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Lindson N, et al. Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013183.pub2.

23.

Broms U, Korhonen T, Kaprio J. Smoking reduction predicts cessation: longitudinal evidence from the Finnish adult twin cohort. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(3):423–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200801888988.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Larabie LC. To what extent do smokers plan quit attempts? Tob Control. 2005;14(6):425. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.013615.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ferguson SG, et al. Unplanned quit attempts—results from a U.S. sample of smokers and ex-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(7):827–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp072.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Garnett C, et al. Understanding the association between spontaneous quit attempts and improved smoking cessation success rates: a population survey in England with 6-month follow-up. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(9):1460–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz115.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Zhu S-H, et al. Smoking cessation with and without assistance: a population-based analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(4):305–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00124-0.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Papadakis S, et al. Quitting behaviours and cessation methods used in eight European countries in 2018: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe surveys. Eur J Pub Health. 2020;30(Supplement_3):iii26–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa082.CrossRef

29.

Watkins SL, et al. Real-world effectiveness of smoking cessation strategies for young and older adults: findings from a nationally representative cohort. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(9):1560–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz223.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Smith AL, Chapman S, Dunlop SM. What do we know about unassisted smoking cessation in Australia? A systematic review, 2005–2012. Tob Control. 2015;24(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051019.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Raupach T, West R, Brown J. The Most “successful” method for failing to quit smoking is unassisted cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(3):748–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts164.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Soulakova JN, Crockett LJ. Unassisted quitting and smoking cessation methods used in the United States: analyses of 2010–2011 tobacco use supplement to the current population survey data. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;20(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw273.CrossRefPubMedCentral

33.

Chaiton M, et al. Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e011045. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Borland R, et al. How much unsuccessful quitting activity is going on among adult smokers? Data from the international tobacco control four country cohort survey. Addiction. 2012;107(3):673–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03685.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Statistics Norway. Reise- og ferieundersøkelsen. Dokumentasjon. [Holdiay and Travel Survey. Documentation]. Oslo; 2021. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/transport-og-reiseliv/artikler-og-publikasjoner/reise-og-ferieundersokelsen. [cited 2021 13.10]

36.

Lund KE, Vedøy TF. A conceptual framework for assessing the public health effects from snus and novel non-combustible nicotine products. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725211021248.

37.

Lund KE, McNeill A, Scheffels J. The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(8):817–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Scheffels J, Lund KE, McNeill A. Contrasting snus and NRT as methods to quit smoking. An observational study. Harm Reduct J. 2012;9(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-9-10.

39.

Lund KE, Vedøy TF, Bauld L. Do never smokers make up an increasing share of snus users as cigarette smoking declines? Changes in smoking status among male snus users in Norway 2003–15. Addiction. 2017;112(2):340–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13638.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rosen LJ, et al. Beyond “safe and effective”: the urgent need for high-impact smoking cessation medications. Prev Med. 2021:106567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106567.

41.

McEwan M, et al. A randomised study to investigate the nicotine pharmacokinetics of Oral nicotine pouches and a combustible cigarette. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9.

42.

Piñeiro B, et al. Gender differences in use and expectancies of e-cigarettes: online survey results. Addict Behav. 2016;52:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Romijnders KA, et al. E-liquid flavor preferences and individual factors related to Vaping: a survey among Dutch never-users, smokers, dual users, and exclusive Vapers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23):4661.CrossRef

44.

Rest EC, Brikmanis KN, Mermelstein RJ. Preferred flavors and tobacco use patterns in adult dual users of cigarettes and ENDS. Addict Behav. 2022;125:107168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107168.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Notley C, et al. The unique contribution of e-cigarettes for tobacco harm reduction in supporting smoking relapse prevention. Harm Reduct J. 2018;15(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0237-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income. Prev Med. 2005;40(6):756–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.022.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Kock L, Brown J, Shahab L. Association of Socioeconomic Position with e-cigarette use among individuals who quit smoking in England, 2014 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4207.

Title: Smoking cessation aids and strategies: a population-based survey of former and current smokers in Norway
Authors: Marianne Lund
Ingeborg Lund
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Smoking and Nicotine Detoxification
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13032-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Smoking cessation aids and strategies: a population-based survey of former and current smokers in Norway

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown and link to women and children’s experiences of violence in the home in South Africa

Tracking the impacts of climate change on human health via indicators: lessons from the Lancet Countdown

Accelerate the process of getting vaccinated: factors associated with consideration of and accessibility to COVID-19 vaccination in metropolises of China

Qualitative exploration of perceived barriers of exclusive breastfeeding among pregnant teenagers in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana

Methods for conducting trends analysis: roadmap for comparing outcomes from three national HIV Population-based household surveys in Kenya (2007, 2012, and 2018)

Speaking COVID-19: supporting COVID-19 communication and engagement efforts with people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities