Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2023

26-07-2023 | Small Bowel Resection | 2023 SAGES Oral

Predictive factors for operative intervention and ideal length of non-operative trial in adhesive small bowel obstruction

Authors: Tara van Veen, Purushotham Ramanathan, Lolita Ramsey, Jonathan Dort, Dina Tabello

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is responsible for 350,000 U.S. hospitalizations and costs ~ $2.3 billion annually. The current standard of care for SBO is to trial 3 to 5 days of non-operative management. This study evaluated the factors associated with operative management.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted with adhesive SBO. Exclusions were for operative intervention within 24 h or death.

Results

At baseline (N = 360), mean age was 65.9 years, 57.8% female, 72.3% white, mean BMI 26.1, 38.7% with history of SBO and 98.1% had history of abdominal surgery. Symptom onset prior to hospitalization was 1–2 days. 55.6% had successful non-operative management at discharge (median length of stay 3 days) vs. 44.4% operative conversion. In univariate analyses, BMI, SBO history, surgical history, days symptom onset, vitals, abdominal pain, obstipation, acute kidney injury, and lack of small bowel feces sign on CT scan were significantly associated with operative management. In a multivariable logistic regression, after controlling all other variables, a lack of small bowel feces sign (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.25, 95% CI 1.06–4.77, p = 0.04) and history of exploratory laparotomy (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21–0.90, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with operative management. Time from admission to surgery averaged 3.89 days: small bowel resection (55/160) was 4.9 days (median = 4), compared to patients without resection (3.4 days, median = 2; p = 0.00; OR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.07–1.35).

Conclusions

A lack of small bowel feces sign can be a potential indicator for operative management and should be further explored. Since the median resolution of symptoms in the non-operative management group was ~ 2 days and a 20% higher odds for bowel resection each day surgery is delayed, the conservative trial period for adhesive SBO should not exceed 3 days.

Graphical abstract

Literature
1.
go back to reference Behman R et al (2020) Early operative management in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: population-based cost analysis. BJS Open 4(5):914–923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Behman R et al (2020) Early operative management in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: population-based cost analysis. BJS Open 4(5):914–923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Behman R et al (2019) Association of surgical intervention for adhesive small-bowel obstruction with the risk of recurrence. JAMA Surg 154(5):413–420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Behman R et al (2019) Association of surgical intervention for adhesive small-bowel obstruction with the risk of recurrence. JAMA Surg 154(5):413–420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Maung AA, Johnson DC, Piper GL, Barbosa RR, Rowell SE, Bokhari F, Collins JN, Gordon JR, Ra JH, Kerwin AJ, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2012) Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(5 Suppl 4):S362–S369. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827019deCrossRef Maung AA, Johnson DC, Piper GL, Barbosa RR, Rowell SE, Bokhari F, Collins JN, Gordon JR, Ra JH, Kerwin AJ, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2012) Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(5 Suppl 4):S362–S369. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​TA.​0b013e31827019de​CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Azagury D et al (2015) Small bowel obstruction: a practical step-by-step evidence-based approach to evaluation, decision making, and management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(4):661–668CrossRefPubMed Azagury D et al (2015) Small bowel obstruction: a practical step-by-step evidence-based approach to evaluation, decision making, and management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(4):661–668CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bauer J et al (2015) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: early operative versus observational management. Am Surg 81(6):614–620CrossRefPubMed Bauer J et al (2015) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: early operative versus observational management. Am Surg 81(6):614–620CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Komatsu I et al (2010) Development of a simple model for predicting need for surgery in patients who initially undergo conservative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 200(2):215–223CrossRefPubMed Komatsu I et al (2010) Development of a simple model for predicting need for surgery in patients who initially undergo conservative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 200(2):215–223CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Suri RR et al (2014) Computed tomography features associated with operative management for non-strangulating small bowel obstruction. Can J Surg 57(4):254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suri RR et al (2014) Computed tomography features associated with operative management for non-strangulating small bowel obstruction. Can J Surg 57(4):254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hajibandeh S et al (2017) Operative versus non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 45:58–66CrossRefPubMed Hajibandeh S et al (2017) Operative versus non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 45:58–66CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Barmparas G et al (2010) The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 14(10):1619–1628CrossRefPubMed Barmparas G et al (2010) The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 14(10):1619–1628CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Keenan JE et al (2014) Trials of nonoperative management exceeding 3 days are associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(6):1367–1372CrossRefPubMed Keenan JE et al (2014) Trials of nonoperative management exceeding 3 days are associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(6):1367–1372CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zielinski MD et al (2017) Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83(1):47–54CrossRefPubMed Zielinski MD et al (2017) Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83(1):47–54CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictive factors for operative intervention and ideal length of non-operative trial in adhesive small bowel obstruction
Authors
Tara van Veen
Purushotham Ramanathan
Lolita Ramsey
Jonathan Dort
Dina Tabello
Publication date
26-07-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10282-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2023

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2023 Go to the issue