Skip to main content
Top
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ruscio S, Abdelgawad M, Badiali D, Iorio O, Rizzello M, Cavallaro G, Severi C, Silecchia G. Simple versus reinforced cruroplasty in patients submitted to concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective evaluation in a bariatric center of excellence. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(6): 2374–81. Ruscio S, Abdelgawad M, Badiali D, Iorio O, Rizzello M, Cavallaro G, Severi C, Silecchia G. Simple versus reinforced cruroplasty in patients submitted to concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective evaluation in a bariatric center of excellence. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(6): 2374–81.
3.
go back to reference Rosenthal RJ; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; 8 (1):8–19. Rosenthal RJ; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; 8 (1):8–19.
4.
go back to reference Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, Mittal SK, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, Fanelli RD; SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(12):4409–28. Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, Mittal SK, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, Fanelli RD; SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(12):4409–28.
5.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Angrisani L, Belachew M, Chevallier JM, Favretti F, Finer N, Fingerhut A, Garcia Caballero M, Guisado Macias JA, Mittermair R, Morino M, Msika S, Rubino F, Tacchino R, Weiner R, Neugebauer EA; European association for endoscopic surgery. Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(2):200–21. Sauerland S, Angrisani L, Belachew M, Chevallier JM, Favretti F, Finer N, Fingerhut A, Garcia Caballero M, Guisado Macias JA, Mittermair R, Morino M, Msika S, Rubino F, Tacchino R, Weiner R, Neugebauer EA; European association for endoscopic surgery. Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(2):200–21.
6.
go back to reference Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Hiatal surface area as a basis for a new classification of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1384–5. Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Hiatal surface area as a basis for a new classification of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1384–5.
7.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Jennings N, Balupuri S, Small PK. Simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy and hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(1): 159–66. Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Jennings N, Balupuri S, Small PK. Simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy and hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(1): 159–66.
8.
go back to reference Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Granderath F, Syré G, Wayand W, Zehetner J. The esophageal hiatus: what is the normal size? Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 988–991. Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Granderath F, Syré G, Wayand W, Zehetner J. The esophageal hiatus: what is the normal size? Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 988–991.
9.
go back to reference Zhang C, Liu D, Li F, Watson DI, Gao X, Koetje JH, Luo T, Yan C, Du X, Wang Z. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(12):4913–4922. Zhang C, Liu D, Li F, Watson DI, Gao X, Koetje JH, Luo T, Yan C, Du X, Wang Z. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(12):4913–4922.
10.
go back to reference Iossa A, Silecchia G. Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2019; 33 (11):3783–3789. Iossa A, Silecchia G. Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2019; 33 (11):3783–3789.
Metadata
Title
Letter in Reply: Long-term Results After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Posterior Cruroplasty: Five-Year Follow-up
Authors
Cristian Eugeniu Boru
Gianfranco Silecchia
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04573-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2020 Go to the issue