Published in:
01-12-2023 | Skin Graft | Original Article
Surgical approach to penile reconstruction for shaft skin excision from circumcision
Authors:
Thomas G. W. Harris, Preeya Khandge, Wayland J. Wu, Angelo A. Leto Barone, Jordan P. Steinberg, Richard J. Redett III, John P. Gearhart
Published in:
Pediatric Surgery International
|
Issue 1/2023
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Circumcision is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures. Complications are infrequent, including bleeding, though can be significant such as shaft skin excision. The aim of this study was to identify mechanism of injury and reconstructive techniques for skin excision using a full thickness skin graft (FTSG) or with the novel application of tissue expanders (TE).
Methods
Patients who underwent penile reconstruction following shaft skin excision from an overzealous circumcision were retrospectively reviewed. The penis was covered using a FTSG, harvested from the groin/hip, or using TE, with expanders placed in residual shaft skin.
Results
Twelve patients experienced significant skin loss (range 65–95%) including 2 with partial glans loss. Ten were reconstructed using a FTSG and 2 with TE. Injury was most frequently from a Mogen clamp (n = 9), or from a Gomco clamp, Plastibell device, and electrocautery burns. Six FTSG patients experienced complications with lymphedema (n = 3) most common.
Conclusion
Shaft skin excision is a devastating complication with risk greatest from Mogen clamp use. TE is preferred as this avoids donor site morbidity which reassures parents but requires sufficient residual skin that can be expanded. Both techniques effectively provide soft tissue coverage with acceptable appearance and long-term function.