Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 2/2015

01-06-2015 | Clinical Paper

Skeletal Relapse Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement

Authors: Nanda Kishore Sahoo, Balakrishnan Jayan, Ankur Thakral, Vishvaroop Nagpal

Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is an accepted and standard procedure to address mandibular corpus deficiency. The relapse following the mandibular advancement has a negative impact both on clinician and patient.

Purpose

To analyse the hard tissue changes and to investigate relapse following SSRO advancement procedure.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of 21 patients treated by bilateral SSRO advancement at our institute was conducted. Lateral cephalograms obtained at pre-treatment (T1), pre-surgery (T2), 2 months (T3) and 2 years post-surgery (T4) were evaluated by an independent investigator. The data T2–T3 revealed immediate postoperative changes, and T3–T4 revealed skeletal relapse following surgery after 2 years.

Results

Twelve females and nine males with age ranging from 16 to 24 years underwent mandibular advancement. The mean follow-up period was 2 years 7 months ± 4 months. The mean mandibular advancement at pogonion was 5.1 ± 1.25 mm with significant improvement in SNB, ANB, CoGn, maxillo-mandibular differential and SN:GoPg ratio following surgery. Comparison of the outcomes following surgery revealed that the mean relapse at pogonion was 0.2 ± 0.44 mm. B point, mandibular corpus length, anterior and posterior facial height remained stable with no significant relapse following mandibular advancement.

Conclusion

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy within the range of mandibular advancement is a stable procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DalPont G (1961) Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19:42 DalPont G (1961) Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19:42
2.
go back to reference Ellis E, Carlson DS (1990) Neuromuscular adaptation after orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 2:811–830 Ellis E, Carlson DS (1990) Neuromuscular adaptation after orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 2:811–830
3.
go back to reference Schendel SA, Epker BN (1980) Results after mandibular advancement surgery: an analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surg 38:265PubMed Schendel SA, Epker BN (1980) Results after mandibular advancement surgery: an analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surg 38:265PubMed
4.
go back to reference Epker BN, Wessberg GA (1982) Mechanisms of early skeletal relapse following surgical advancement of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:175–182CrossRef Epker BN, Wessberg GA (1982) Mechanisms of early skeletal relapse following surgical advancement of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:175–182CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hoppenreijs TJM, Stoelinga PJW, Grace KL, Robben CMG (1999) Long-term evaluation of patients with progressive condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:411–418CrossRefPubMed Hoppenreijs TJM, Stoelinga PJW, Grace KL, Robben CMG (1999) Long-term evaluation of patients with progressive condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:411–418CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ellis E III, Sinn DP (1994) Connective tissue forces from mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1160–1163CrossRefPubMed Ellis E III, Sinn DP (1994) Connective tissue forces from mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1160–1163CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hunsuck EE (1968) A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 26:250–253PubMed Hunsuck EE (1968) A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 26:250–253PubMed
8.
go back to reference Eggensperger N, Smolka K, Luder J, Iizuka T (2006) Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:36–42CrossRefPubMed Eggensperger N, Smolka K, Luder J, Iizuka T (2006) Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:36–42CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Sickels JE (1991) A comparative study of bicortical screws and suspension wires versus bicortical screws in large mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1293–1296CrossRefPubMed Van Sickels JE (1991) A comparative study of bicortical screws and suspension wires versus bicortical screws in large mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1293–1296CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gassmann CJ, Van Sickels JE, Thrash WJ (1990) Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:450–454CrossRefPubMed Gassmann CJ, Van Sickels JE, Thrash WJ (1990) Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:450–454CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Knaup CA, Wallen TR, Bloomquist DS (1993) Linear and rotational changes in large mandibular advancements using three or four fixation screws. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 8:245–263PubMed Knaup CA, Wallen TR, Bloomquist DS (1993) Linear and rotational changes in large mandibular advancements using three or four fixation screws. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 8:245–263PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T (2001) Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:368–381CrossRefPubMed Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T (2001) Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:368–381CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Simmons KE, Turvey TA, Phillips C, Proffit WR (1992) Surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency: five year follow-up. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 7:67–79PubMed Simmons KE, Turvey TA, Phillips C, Proffit WR (1992) Surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency: five year follow-up. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 7:67–79PubMed
14.
go back to reference Scheerlinck JPO, Stoelinga PJW, Bliijdorp PA (1994) Sagittal split advancement osteotomies stabilized with miniplates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:127–131CrossRefPubMed Scheerlinck JPO, Stoelinga PJW, Bliijdorp PA (1994) Sagittal split advancement osteotomies stabilized with miniplates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:127–131CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hwang SJ, Haers PE, Seifert B, Sailer HF (2004) Non-surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 32:103–111CrossRef Hwang SJ, Haers PE, Seifert B, Sailer HF (2004) Non-surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 32:103–111CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moore KE, Gooris PJJ, Stoelinga PJW (1991) The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery. Report of 5 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:448–460CrossRefPubMed Moore KE, Gooris PJJ, Stoelinga PJW (1991) The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery. Report of 5 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:448–460CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Douma E, Kuftinec MM, Moshiri F (1991) A comparative study of stability after mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:141–155CrossRefPubMed Douma E, Kuftinec MM, Moshiri F (1991) A comparative study of stability after mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:141–155CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stoelinga PJW, Leenen RJ (1981) Class II anomalies: a coordinated approach to the management of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue problems. J Oral Surg 39:827–841PubMed Stoelinga PJW, Leenen RJ (1981) Class II anomalies: a coordinated approach to the management of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue problems. J Oral Surg 39:827–841PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hwang SJ, Haers PE, Zimmermann A, Oechslin C, Seifert B, Sailer HF (2000) Surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:542–552CrossRefPubMed Hwang SJ, Haers PE, Zimmermann A, Oechslin C, Seifert B, Sailer HF (2000) Surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:542–552CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Worms FW, Speidel TM, Bevis RR, Waite DE (1980) Posttreatment stability and esthetics of orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 50:251–273PubMed Worms FW, Speidel TM, Bevis RR, Waite DE (1980) Posttreatment stability and esthetics of orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 50:251–273PubMed
Metadata
Title
Skeletal Relapse Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement
Authors
Nanda Kishore Sahoo
Balakrishnan Jayan
Ankur Thakral
Vishvaroop Nagpal
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Electronic ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0640-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 2/2015 Go to the issue